The value of postoperative fever evaluation

Julie Freischlag, Ronald W. Busuttil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluation of fever in the early postoperative period often includes a battery of diagnostic tests to determine the source of or to exclude a serious infection. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of the information obtained from these tests, the data for 464 patients who had undergone abdominal operation were reviewed. Of the 464 patients, 71 (15%) fulfilled the criterion of fever with rectal temperature of 38.5 °C or greater in the first 6 postoperative days. For 27% (19/71) of the patients with a postoperative fever, culture-proven infection was responsible for the fever. For 74% (14/19) of the patients with infection, the correct diagnosis was made based on clinical findings and confirmed by a single appropriate test. The remaining five patients with infection were diagnosed via a battery of tests because of the absence of clinical findings indicating the source of their infection. Rote ordering of unnecessary tests resulted in an excess expenditure of $19,738, or $278 per febrile patient. We conclude that routine evaluations of fever do not alter the outcome of the majority of patients and are not cost effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)358-363
Number of pages6
JournalSurgery
Volume94
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1983

Fingerprint

Fever
Infection
Health Expenditures
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Postoperative Period
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Temperature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Freischlag, J., & Busuttil, R. W. (1983). The value of postoperative fever evaluation. Surgery, 94(2), 358-363.

The value of postoperative fever evaluation. / Freischlag, Julie; Busuttil, Ronald W.

In: Surgery, Vol. 94, No. 2, 1983, p. 358-363.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Freischlag, J & Busuttil, RW 1983, 'The value of postoperative fever evaluation', Surgery, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 358-363.
Freischlag J, Busuttil RW. The value of postoperative fever evaluation. Surgery. 1983;94(2):358-363.
Freischlag, Julie ; Busuttil, Ronald W. / The value of postoperative fever evaluation. In: Surgery. 1983 ; Vol. 94, No. 2. pp. 358-363.
@article{c227ef908f654197a9d55dd470db20c0,
title = "The value of postoperative fever evaluation",
abstract = "Evaluation of fever in the early postoperative period often includes a battery of diagnostic tests to determine the source of or to exclude a serious infection. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of the information obtained from these tests, the data for 464 patients who had undergone abdominal operation were reviewed. Of the 464 patients, 71 (15{\%}) fulfilled the criterion of fever with rectal temperature of 38.5 °C or greater in the first 6 postoperative days. For 27{\%} (19/71) of the patients with a postoperative fever, culture-proven infection was responsible for the fever. For 74{\%} (14/19) of the patients with infection, the correct diagnosis was made based on clinical findings and confirmed by a single appropriate test. The remaining five patients with infection were diagnosed via a battery of tests because of the absence of clinical findings indicating the source of their infection. Rote ordering of unnecessary tests resulted in an excess expenditure of $19,738, or $278 per febrile patient. We conclude that routine evaluations of fever do not alter the outcome of the majority of patients and are not cost effective.",
author = "Julie Freischlag and Busuttil, {Ronald W.}",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "358--363",
journal = "Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0039-6060",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of postoperative fever evaluation

AU - Freischlag, Julie

AU - Busuttil, Ronald W.

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Evaluation of fever in the early postoperative period often includes a battery of diagnostic tests to determine the source of or to exclude a serious infection. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of the information obtained from these tests, the data for 464 patients who had undergone abdominal operation were reviewed. Of the 464 patients, 71 (15%) fulfilled the criterion of fever with rectal temperature of 38.5 °C or greater in the first 6 postoperative days. For 27% (19/71) of the patients with a postoperative fever, culture-proven infection was responsible for the fever. For 74% (14/19) of the patients with infection, the correct diagnosis was made based on clinical findings and confirmed by a single appropriate test. The remaining five patients with infection were diagnosed via a battery of tests because of the absence of clinical findings indicating the source of their infection. Rote ordering of unnecessary tests resulted in an excess expenditure of $19,738, or $278 per febrile patient. We conclude that routine evaluations of fever do not alter the outcome of the majority of patients and are not cost effective.

AB - Evaluation of fever in the early postoperative period often includes a battery of diagnostic tests to determine the source of or to exclude a serious infection. In order to evaluate the clinical usefulness and cost effectiveness of the information obtained from these tests, the data for 464 patients who had undergone abdominal operation were reviewed. Of the 464 patients, 71 (15%) fulfilled the criterion of fever with rectal temperature of 38.5 °C or greater in the first 6 postoperative days. For 27% (19/71) of the patients with a postoperative fever, culture-proven infection was responsible for the fever. For 74% (14/19) of the patients with infection, the correct diagnosis was made based on clinical findings and confirmed by a single appropriate test. The remaining five patients with infection were diagnosed via a battery of tests because of the absence of clinical findings indicating the source of their infection. Rote ordering of unnecessary tests resulted in an excess expenditure of $19,738, or $278 per febrile patient. We conclude that routine evaluations of fever do not alter the outcome of the majority of patients and are not cost effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020591210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020591210&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6410527

AN - SCOPUS:0020591210

VL - 94

SP - 358

EP - 363

JO - Surgery (United States)

JF - Surgery (United States)

SN - 0039-6060

IS - 2

ER -