The value of disk replacement?

Jonathan Kramer, Yashar Javidan, Jeremy Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The high costs associated with spine surgery underlie the increasing importance to evaluate new treatments such as disc replacement. In order to prove their value as a surgical modality in spine surgery, both clinical efficacy and cost-analysis data must be examined closely. Efficacy data shows promising short-term results for both cervical and lumbar disc replacement. However, cost data remains scarce for both treatments. In this review of the literature, there were seven studies evaluating cost, three of which calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and only one that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The short-term data suggests that both cervical and lumbar disc replacement are less costly than fusion for single-level disease. Further long-term cost data is necessary to better elucidate the true value of disc replacement and whether it should be accepted as a standard alternative to fusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-51
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Spine Surgery
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Spine
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Cost-Benefit Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The value of disk replacement? / Kramer, Jonathan; Javidan, Yashar; Smith, Jeremy.

In: Seminars in Spine Surgery, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.03.2014, p. 45-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kramer, Jonathan ; Javidan, Yashar ; Smith, Jeremy. / The value of disk replacement?. In: Seminars in Spine Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 45-51.
@article{b8f065738e9041ada8216e7194647dbe,
title = "The value of disk replacement?",
abstract = "The high costs associated with spine surgery underlie the increasing importance to evaluate new treatments such as disc replacement. In order to prove their value as a surgical modality in spine surgery, both clinical efficacy and cost-analysis data must be examined closely. Efficacy data shows promising short-term results for both cervical and lumbar disc replacement. However, cost data remains scarce for both treatments. In this review of the literature, there were seven studies evaluating cost, three of which calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and only one that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The short-term data suggests that both cervical and lumbar disc replacement are less costly than fusion for single-level disease. Further long-term cost data is necessary to better elucidate the true value of disc replacement and whether it should be accepted as a standard alternative to fusion.",
author = "Jonathan Kramer and Yashar Javidan and Jeremy Smith",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.semss.2013.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "45--51",
journal = "Seminars in Spine Surgery",
issn = "1040-7383",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of disk replacement?

AU - Kramer, Jonathan

AU - Javidan, Yashar

AU - Smith, Jeremy

PY - 2014/3/1

Y1 - 2014/3/1

N2 - The high costs associated with spine surgery underlie the increasing importance to evaluate new treatments such as disc replacement. In order to prove their value as a surgical modality in spine surgery, both clinical efficacy and cost-analysis data must be examined closely. Efficacy data shows promising short-term results for both cervical and lumbar disc replacement. However, cost data remains scarce for both treatments. In this review of the literature, there were seven studies evaluating cost, three of which calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and only one that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The short-term data suggests that both cervical and lumbar disc replacement are less costly than fusion for single-level disease. Further long-term cost data is necessary to better elucidate the true value of disc replacement and whether it should be accepted as a standard alternative to fusion.

AB - The high costs associated with spine surgery underlie the increasing importance to evaluate new treatments such as disc replacement. In order to prove their value as a surgical modality in spine surgery, both clinical efficacy and cost-analysis data must be examined closely. Efficacy data shows promising short-term results for both cervical and lumbar disc replacement. However, cost data remains scarce for both treatments. In this review of the literature, there were seven studies evaluating cost, three of which calculated quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and only one that calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). The short-term data suggests that both cervical and lumbar disc replacement are less costly than fusion for single-level disease. Further long-term cost data is necessary to better elucidate the true value of disc replacement and whether it should be accepted as a standard alternative to fusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894306285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894306285&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semss.2013.07.010

DO - 10.1053/j.semss.2013.07.010

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84894306285

VL - 26

SP - 45

EP - 51

JO - Seminars in Spine Surgery

JF - Seminars in Spine Surgery

SN - 1040-7383

IS - 1

ER -