The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines: Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings

David Lubarsky, Peter S.A. Glass, Brian Ginsberg, Guy De L. Dear, Mark E. Dentz, Tong J. Gan, Iain C. Sanderson, Monty G. Mythen, Sherry Dufore, C. Christopher Pressley, William C. Gilbert, William D. White, M. Lynne Alexander, Robert L. Coleman, Mark Rogers, J. G. Reves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although approximately 2,000 medical practice guidelines have been proposed, few have been successfully implemented and sustained. We hypothesized that we could develop and institute practice guidelines to promote more appropriate use of costly anesthetics, to generate and sustain widespread compliance from a large physician group, and to decrease costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective before and after comparison study was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the first of two sets of patients 1 month before discussion of practice guidelines. Practice guidelines were developed by the physicians and their associated care team for the intraoperative use of anesthetic drugs. A drug distribution process was developed to aid compliance. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the second set of patients 1 month after institution of practice guidelines. Hospital drug costs and adherence to guidelines were noted throughout the study period and for each of the following 9 months by querying the database of an automated anesthesia record keeper. Results: A total of 1,744 patients were studied. Drug costs decreased from 56 dollars per case to 32 dollars per case as a result of adherence to practice guidelines. Perioperative patient flow was minimally affected. Time (mean ± SD) from end of surgery to arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 11 ± 7 min before the authors instituted practice guidelines to 14 ± 8 min after practice guidelines (P < 0.0001). Admission of inpatients to the PACU receiving monitored anesthesia care increased from 6.5 to 12.9% (P < 0.02). Perioperative patient flow and clinical outcomes were not otherwise adversely affected. Compliance and cost savings have been sustained. Conclusions: This study is an example of a successful physician- directed program to promote more appropriate utilization of health care resources. Cost savings were obtained without any substantial changes in clinical outcomes. Institution of similar practice guidelines should result in pharmaceutical savings in the range of 50% at tertiary care centers around the country, with a slightly smaller degree of savings expected at institutions with more ambulatory surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1145-1160
Number of pages16
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume86
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cost Savings
Practice Guidelines
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Anesthesia
Compliance
Drug Costs
Physicians
Tertiary Care Centers
Anesthetics
Intraoperative Care
Guideline Adherence
Hospital Costs
Health Resources
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Inpatients
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Anesthesia, costs
  • Anesthesia, recovery periods
  • Anesthesiology, physicians' practice patterns
  • Economics, drugs
  • Equipment, computers: information systems
  • Outcomes
  • Practice guidelines

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines : Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings. / Lubarsky, David; Glass, Peter S.A.; Ginsberg, Brian; Dear, Guy De L.; Dentz, Mark E.; Gan, Tong J.; Sanderson, Iain C.; Mythen, Monty G.; Dufore, Sherry; Pressley, C. Christopher; Gilbert, William C.; White, William D.; Alexander, M. Lynne; Coleman, Robert L.; Rogers, Mark; Reves, J. G.

In: Anesthesiology, Vol. 86, No. 5, 01.01.1997, p. 1145-1160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lubarsky, D, Glass, PSA, Ginsberg, B, Dear, GDL, Dentz, ME, Gan, TJ, Sanderson, IC, Mythen, MG, Dufore, S, Pressley, CC, Gilbert, WC, White, WD, Alexander, ML, Coleman, RL, Rogers, M & Reves, JG 1997, 'The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines: Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings', Anesthesiology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1145-1160. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199705000-00019
Lubarsky, David ; Glass, Peter S.A. ; Ginsberg, Brian ; Dear, Guy De L. ; Dentz, Mark E. ; Gan, Tong J. ; Sanderson, Iain C. ; Mythen, Monty G. ; Dufore, Sherry ; Pressley, C. Christopher ; Gilbert, William C. ; White, William D. ; Alexander, M. Lynne ; Coleman, Robert L. ; Rogers, Mark ; Reves, J. G. / The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines : Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings. In: Anesthesiology. 1997 ; Vol. 86, No. 5. pp. 1145-1160.
@article{412ce462e45e44028d68d410ca2289c3,
title = "The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines: Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings",
abstract = "Background: Although approximately 2,000 medical practice guidelines have been proposed, few have been successfully implemented and sustained. We hypothesized that we could develop and institute practice guidelines to promote more appropriate use of costly anesthetics, to generate and sustain widespread compliance from a large physician group, and to decrease costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective before and after comparison study was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the first of two sets of patients 1 month before discussion of practice guidelines. Practice guidelines were developed by the physicians and their associated care team for the intraoperative use of anesthetic drugs. A drug distribution process was developed to aid compliance. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the second set of patients 1 month after institution of practice guidelines. Hospital drug costs and adherence to guidelines were noted throughout the study period and for each of the following 9 months by querying the database of an automated anesthesia record keeper. Results: A total of 1,744 patients were studied. Drug costs decreased from 56 dollars per case to 32 dollars per case as a result of adherence to practice guidelines. Perioperative patient flow was minimally affected. Time (mean ± SD) from end of surgery to arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 11 ± 7 min before the authors instituted practice guidelines to 14 ± 8 min after practice guidelines (P < 0.0001). Admission of inpatients to the PACU receiving monitored anesthesia care increased from 6.5 to 12.9{\%} (P < 0.02). Perioperative patient flow and clinical outcomes were not otherwise adversely affected. Compliance and cost savings have been sustained. Conclusions: This study is an example of a successful physician- directed program to promote more appropriate utilization of health care resources. Cost savings were obtained without any substantial changes in clinical outcomes. Institution of similar practice guidelines should result in pharmaceutical savings in the range of 50{\%} at tertiary care centers around the country, with a slightly smaller degree of savings expected at institutions with more ambulatory surgery.",
keywords = "Anesthesia, costs, Anesthesia, recovery periods, Anesthesiology, physicians' practice patterns, Economics, drugs, Equipment, computers: information systems, Outcomes, Practice guidelines",
author = "David Lubarsky and Glass, {Peter S.A.} and Brian Ginsberg and Dear, {Guy De L.} and Dentz, {Mark E.} and Gan, {Tong J.} and Sanderson, {Iain C.} and Mythen, {Monty G.} and Sherry Dufore and Pressley, {C. Christopher} and Gilbert, {William C.} and White, {William D.} and Alexander, {M. Lynne} and Coleman, {Robert L.} and Mark Rogers and Reves, {J. G.}",
year = "1997",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000542-199705000-00019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "1145--1160",
journal = "Anesthesiology",
issn = "0003-3022",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines

T2 - Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings

AU - Lubarsky, David

AU - Glass, Peter S.A.

AU - Ginsberg, Brian

AU - Dear, Guy De L.

AU - Dentz, Mark E.

AU - Gan, Tong J.

AU - Sanderson, Iain C.

AU - Mythen, Monty G.

AU - Dufore, Sherry

AU - Pressley, C. Christopher

AU - Gilbert, William C.

AU - White, William D.

AU - Alexander, M. Lynne

AU - Coleman, Robert L.

AU - Rogers, Mark

AU - Reves, J. G.

PY - 1997/1/1

Y1 - 1997/1/1

N2 - Background: Although approximately 2,000 medical practice guidelines have been proposed, few have been successfully implemented and sustained. We hypothesized that we could develop and institute practice guidelines to promote more appropriate use of costly anesthetics, to generate and sustain widespread compliance from a large physician group, and to decrease costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective before and after comparison study was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the first of two sets of patients 1 month before discussion of practice guidelines. Practice guidelines were developed by the physicians and their associated care team for the intraoperative use of anesthetic drugs. A drug distribution process was developed to aid compliance. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the second set of patients 1 month after institution of practice guidelines. Hospital drug costs and adherence to guidelines were noted throughout the study period and for each of the following 9 months by querying the database of an automated anesthesia record keeper. Results: A total of 1,744 patients were studied. Drug costs decreased from 56 dollars per case to 32 dollars per case as a result of adherence to practice guidelines. Perioperative patient flow was minimally affected. Time (mean ± SD) from end of surgery to arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 11 ± 7 min before the authors instituted practice guidelines to 14 ± 8 min after practice guidelines (P < 0.0001). Admission of inpatients to the PACU receiving monitored anesthesia care increased from 6.5 to 12.9% (P < 0.02). Perioperative patient flow and clinical outcomes were not otherwise adversely affected. Compliance and cost savings have been sustained. Conclusions: This study is an example of a successful physician- directed program to promote more appropriate utilization of health care resources. Cost savings were obtained without any substantial changes in clinical outcomes. Institution of similar practice guidelines should result in pharmaceutical savings in the range of 50% at tertiary care centers around the country, with a slightly smaller degree of savings expected at institutions with more ambulatory surgery.

AB - Background: Although approximately 2,000 medical practice guidelines have been proposed, few have been successfully implemented and sustained. We hypothesized that we could develop and institute practice guidelines to promote more appropriate use of costly anesthetics, to generate and sustain widespread compliance from a large physician group, and to decrease costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes. Methods: A prospective before and after comparison study was performed at a tertiary care medical center. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the first of two sets of patients 1 month before discussion of practice guidelines. Practice guidelines were developed by the physicians and their associated care team for the intraoperative use of anesthetic drugs. A drug distribution process was developed to aid compliance. Clinical outcomes data and times indicative of perioperative patient flow were collected on the second set of patients 1 month after institution of practice guidelines. Hospital drug costs and adherence to guidelines were noted throughout the study period and for each of the following 9 months by querying the database of an automated anesthesia record keeper. Results: A total of 1,744 patients were studied. Drug costs decreased from 56 dollars per case to 32 dollars per case as a result of adherence to practice guidelines. Perioperative patient flow was minimally affected. Time (mean ± SD) from end of surgery to arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) increased from 11 ± 7 min before the authors instituted practice guidelines to 14 ± 8 min after practice guidelines (P < 0.0001). Admission of inpatients to the PACU receiving monitored anesthesia care increased from 6.5 to 12.9% (P < 0.02). Perioperative patient flow and clinical outcomes were not otherwise adversely affected. Compliance and cost savings have been sustained. Conclusions: This study is an example of a successful physician- directed program to promote more appropriate utilization of health care resources. Cost savings were obtained without any substantial changes in clinical outcomes. Institution of similar practice guidelines should result in pharmaceutical savings in the range of 50% at tertiary care centers around the country, with a slightly smaller degree of savings expected at institutions with more ambulatory surgery.

KW - Anesthesia, costs

KW - Anesthesia, recovery periods

KW - Anesthesiology, physicians' practice patterns

KW - Economics, drugs

KW - Equipment, computers: information systems

KW - Outcomes

KW - Practice guidelines

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030912438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030912438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000542-199705000-00019

DO - 10.1097/00000542-199705000-00019

M3 - Article

C2 - 9158365

AN - SCOPUS:0030912438

VL - 86

SP - 1145

EP - 1160

JO - Anesthesiology

JF - Anesthesiology

SN - 0003-3022

IS - 5

ER -