The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients

Gregory Jurkovich, C. Mock, E. MacKenzie, A. Burgess, B. Cushing, B. DeLateur, M. McAndrew, J. Morris, M. Swiontkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the ultimate goal of trauma care is to restore injured patients to their former functional status, reliable evaluation of functional status is needed to assess fully the effectiveness of trauma care. We hypothesized that the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a widely used measure of general health status, would be a useful tool to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of trauma patients and that the SIP would identify unexpected problems in the recovery process and groups of patients at high risk for long-term disability. A prospective cohort of 329 patients with lower extremity fractures admitted to three level I trauma centers were interviewed using SIP at 6 and 12 months postinjury. Patients with major neurologic injuries were excluded. Overall SIP scores and each of the component subscores may range from 0 (no disability) to 100. In this series, the mean overall SIP was 9.5 at 6 months and 6.8 at 12 months, compared with a preinjury baseline of 2.5. At 12 months, 52% of patients had no disability (SIP 0 to 3), 23% mild disability (4 to 9), 16% moderate disability (10 to 19), and 9% severe disability (≥20). Disability was widely distributed across the spectrum of activities of daily living, including physical functioning (mean score of 5.5), psychosocial health (mean score of 5.5), sleeping (mean score of 10.0), and work (mean score of 21.0). The SIP scores did not correlate with Injury Severity Score. Higher SIP scores were associated with multiple fractures, higher extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and head injuries (p < 0.05), even though the head injuries in this series were minor (mean head AIS score of 2.1). In conclusion, SIP is a useful tool to evaluate overall functional outcome of trauma patients. Disability in psychosocial functioning was prominent even in this group of patients whose primary injury was a lower extremity fracture. Patients with even minor-associated head injuries were identified as a group at especially high risk for prolonged generalized disability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-631
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
Wounds and Injuries
Craniocerebral Trauma
Abbreviated Injury Scale
Lower Extremity
Nervous System Trauma
Injury Severity Score
Group Processes
Trauma Centers
Activities of Daily Living
Health Status
Extremities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients. / Jurkovich, Gregory; Mock, C.; MacKenzie, E.; Burgess, A.; Cushing, B.; DeLateur, B.; McAndrew, M.; Morris, J.; Swiontkowski, M.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 39, No. 4, 27.11.1995, p. 625-631.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jurkovich, G, Mock, C, MacKenzie, E, Burgess, A, Cushing, B, DeLateur, B, McAndrew, M, Morris, J & Swiontkowski, M 1995, 'The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 625-631. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199510000-00001
Jurkovich, Gregory ; Mock, C. ; MacKenzie, E. ; Burgess, A. ; Cushing, B. ; DeLateur, B. ; McAndrew, M. ; Morris, J. ; Swiontkowski, M. / The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1995 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 625-631.
@article{eac61e9a1bd940faac896510ef4eb48b,
title = "The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients",
abstract = "Because the ultimate goal of trauma care is to restore injured patients to their former functional status, reliable evaluation of functional status is needed to assess fully the effectiveness of trauma care. We hypothesized that the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a widely used measure of general health status, would be a useful tool to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of trauma patients and that the SIP would identify unexpected problems in the recovery process and groups of patients at high risk for long-term disability. A prospective cohort of 329 patients with lower extremity fractures admitted to three level I trauma centers were interviewed using SIP at 6 and 12 months postinjury. Patients with major neurologic injuries were excluded. Overall SIP scores and each of the component subscores may range from 0 (no disability) to 100. In this series, the mean overall SIP was 9.5 at 6 months and 6.8 at 12 months, compared with a preinjury baseline of 2.5. At 12 months, 52{\%} of patients had no disability (SIP 0 to 3), 23{\%} mild disability (4 to 9), 16{\%} moderate disability (10 to 19), and 9{\%} severe disability (≥20). Disability was widely distributed across the spectrum of activities of daily living, including physical functioning (mean score of 5.5), psychosocial health (mean score of 5.5), sleeping (mean score of 10.0), and work (mean score of 21.0). The SIP scores did not correlate with Injury Severity Score. Higher SIP scores were associated with multiple fractures, higher extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and head injuries (p < 0.05), even though the head injuries in this series were minor (mean head AIS score of 2.1). In conclusion, SIP is a useful tool to evaluate overall functional outcome of trauma patients. Disability in psychosocial functioning was prominent even in this group of patients whose primary injury was a lower extremity fracture. Patients with even minor-associated head injuries were identified as a group at especially high risk for prolonged generalized disability.",
author = "Gregory Jurkovich and C. Mock and E. MacKenzie and A. Burgess and B. Cushing and B. DeLateur and M. McAndrew and J. Morris and M. Swiontkowski",
year = "1995",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1097/00005373-199510000-00001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "625--631",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The sickness impact profile as a tool to evaluate functional outcome in trauma patients

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Mock, C.

AU - MacKenzie, E.

AU - Burgess, A.

AU - Cushing, B.

AU - DeLateur, B.

AU - McAndrew, M.

AU - Morris, J.

AU - Swiontkowski, M.

PY - 1995/11/27

Y1 - 1995/11/27

N2 - Because the ultimate goal of trauma care is to restore injured patients to their former functional status, reliable evaluation of functional status is needed to assess fully the effectiveness of trauma care. We hypothesized that the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a widely used measure of general health status, would be a useful tool to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of trauma patients and that the SIP would identify unexpected problems in the recovery process and groups of patients at high risk for long-term disability. A prospective cohort of 329 patients with lower extremity fractures admitted to three level I trauma centers were interviewed using SIP at 6 and 12 months postinjury. Patients with major neurologic injuries were excluded. Overall SIP scores and each of the component subscores may range from 0 (no disability) to 100. In this series, the mean overall SIP was 9.5 at 6 months and 6.8 at 12 months, compared with a preinjury baseline of 2.5. At 12 months, 52% of patients had no disability (SIP 0 to 3), 23% mild disability (4 to 9), 16% moderate disability (10 to 19), and 9% severe disability (≥20). Disability was widely distributed across the spectrum of activities of daily living, including physical functioning (mean score of 5.5), psychosocial health (mean score of 5.5), sleeping (mean score of 10.0), and work (mean score of 21.0). The SIP scores did not correlate with Injury Severity Score. Higher SIP scores were associated with multiple fractures, higher extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and head injuries (p < 0.05), even though the head injuries in this series were minor (mean head AIS score of 2.1). In conclusion, SIP is a useful tool to evaluate overall functional outcome of trauma patients. Disability in psychosocial functioning was prominent even in this group of patients whose primary injury was a lower extremity fracture. Patients with even minor-associated head injuries were identified as a group at especially high risk for prolonged generalized disability.

AB - Because the ultimate goal of trauma care is to restore injured patients to their former functional status, reliable evaluation of functional status is needed to assess fully the effectiveness of trauma care. We hypothesized that the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), a widely used measure of general health status, would be a useful tool to evaluate the long-term functional outcome of trauma patients and that the SIP would identify unexpected problems in the recovery process and groups of patients at high risk for long-term disability. A prospective cohort of 329 patients with lower extremity fractures admitted to three level I trauma centers were interviewed using SIP at 6 and 12 months postinjury. Patients with major neurologic injuries were excluded. Overall SIP scores and each of the component subscores may range from 0 (no disability) to 100. In this series, the mean overall SIP was 9.5 at 6 months and 6.8 at 12 months, compared with a preinjury baseline of 2.5. At 12 months, 52% of patients had no disability (SIP 0 to 3), 23% mild disability (4 to 9), 16% moderate disability (10 to 19), and 9% severe disability (≥20). Disability was widely distributed across the spectrum of activities of daily living, including physical functioning (mean score of 5.5), psychosocial health (mean score of 5.5), sleeping (mean score of 10.0), and work (mean score of 21.0). The SIP scores did not correlate with Injury Severity Score. Higher SIP scores were associated with multiple fractures, higher extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), and head injuries (p < 0.05), even though the head injuries in this series were minor (mean head AIS score of 2.1). In conclusion, SIP is a useful tool to evaluate overall functional outcome of trauma patients. Disability in psychosocial functioning was prominent even in this group of patients whose primary injury was a lower extremity fracture. Patients with even minor-associated head injuries were identified as a group at especially high risk for prolonged generalized disability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028846784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028846784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00005373-199510000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00005373-199510000-00001

M3 - Article

C2 - 7473944

AN - SCOPUS:0028846784

VL - 39

SP - 625

EP - 631

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -