The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety

A. M. O'Connor, J. M. Sargeant, Ian Gardner, J. S. Dickson, M. E. Torrence, C. E. Dewey, I. R. Dohoo, R. B. Evans, J. T. Gray, M. Greiner, G. Keefe, S. L. Lefebvre, P. S. Morley, A. Ramirez, W. Sischo, D. R. Smith, K. Snedeker, J. N. Sofos, M. P. Ward, R. Wills

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, I11, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-139
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Food Protection
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food Safety
Livestock
food safety
Randomized Controlled Trials
livestock
Guidelines
livestock production
Checklist
methodology
terminology
Health
researchers
Terminology
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Microbiology

Cite this

The REFLECT statement : methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. / O'Connor, A. M.; Sargeant, J. M.; Gardner, Ian; Dickson, J. S.; Torrence, M. E.; Dewey, C. E.; Dohoo, I. R.; Evans, R. B.; Gray, J. T.; Greiner, M.; Keefe, G.; Lefebvre, S. L.; Morley, P. S.; Ramirez, A.; Sischo, W.; Smith, D. R.; Snedeker, K.; Sofos, J. N.; Ward, M. P.; Wills, R.

In: Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 132-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

O'Connor, AM, Sargeant, JM, Gardner, I, Dickson, JS, Torrence, ME, Dewey, CE, Dohoo, IR, Evans, RB, Gray, JT, Greiner, M, Keefe, G, Lefebvre, SL, Morley, PS, Ramirez, A, Sischo, W, Smith, DR, Snedeker, K, Sofos, JN, Ward, MP & Wills, R 2010, 'The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety', Journal of Food Protection, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 132-139. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.1.132
O'Connor, A. M. ; Sargeant, J. M. ; Gardner, Ian ; Dickson, J. S. ; Torrence, M. E. ; Dewey, C. E. ; Dohoo, I. R. ; Evans, R. B. ; Gray, J. T. ; Greiner, M. ; Keefe, G. ; Lefebvre, S. L. ; Morley, P. S. ; Ramirez, A. ; Sischo, W. ; Smith, D. R. ; Snedeker, K. ; Sofos, J. N. ; Ward, M. P. ; Wills, R. / The REFLECT statement : methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety. In: Journal of Food Protection. 2010 ; Vol. 73, No. 1. pp. 132-139.
@article{0c73a6dccf2a4357aaa2a0560f29e1aa,
title = "The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety",
abstract = "The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, I11, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.",
author = "O'Connor, {A. M.} and Sargeant, {J. M.} and Ian Gardner and Dickson, {J. S.} and Torrence, {M. E.} and Dewey, {C. E.} and Dohoo, {I. R.} and Evans, {R. B.} and Gray, {J. T.} and M. Greiner and G. Keefe and Lefebvre, {S. L.} and Morley, {P. S.} and A. Ramirez and W. Sischo and Smith, {D. R.} and K. Snedeker and Sofos, {J. N.} and Ward, {M. P.} and R. Wills",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4315/0362-028X-73.1.132",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "132--139",
journal = "Journal of Food Protection",
issn = "0362-028X",
publisher = "International Association for Food Protection",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The REFLECT statement

T2 - methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety

AU - O'Connor, A. M.

AU - Sargeant, J. M.

AU - Gardner, Ian

AU - Dickson, J. S.

AU - Torrence, M. E.

AU - Dewey, C. E.

AU - Dohoo, I. R.

AU - Evans, R. B.

AU - Gray, J. T.

AU - Greiner, M.

AU - Keefe, G.

AU - Lefebvre, S. L.

AU - Morley, P. S.

AU - Ramirez, A.

AU - Sischo, W.

AU - Smith, D. R.

AU - Snedeker, K.

AU - Sofos, J. N.

AU - Ward, M. P.

AU - Wills, R.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, I11, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

AB - The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health, and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A two-day consensus meeting was held on November 18-19, 2008 in Chicago, I11, United States of America, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors, and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety (LFS) and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist, and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health, and food-safety outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=75349085406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=75349085406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4315/0362-028X-73.1.132

DO - 10.4315/0362-028X-73.1.132

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20051216

AN - SCOPUS:75349085406

VL - 73

SP - 132

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Food Protection

JF - Journal of Food Protection

SN - 0362-028X

IS - 1

ER -