The reflect statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement

A. M. O'Connor, J. M. Sargeant, Ian Gardner, J. S. Dickson, M. E. Torrence, C. E. Dewey, I. R. Dohoo, R. B. Evans, J. T. Gray, M. Greiner, G. Keefe, S. L. Lefebvre, P. S. Morley, A. Ramirez, W. Sischo, D. R. Smith, K. Snedeker, J. Sofos, M. P. Ward, R. Wills

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on 18-19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food-safety outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-104
Number of pages10
JournalZoonoses and Public Health
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Food Safety
Livestock
food safety
Randomized Controlled Trials
livestock
Guidelines
livestock production
Checklist
methodology
terminology
Health
researchers
Terminology
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Challenge studies and standards
  • Livestock
  • Randomized trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • veterinary(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

The reflect statement : Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement. / O'Connor, A. M.; Sargeant, J. M.; Gardner, Ian; Dickson, J. S.; Torrence, M. E.; Dewey, C. E.; Dohoo, I. R.; Evans, R. B.; Gray, J. T.; Greiner, M.; Keefe, G.; Lefebvre, S. L.; Morley, P. S.; Ramirez, A.; Sischo, W.; Smith, D. R.; Snedeker, K.; Sofos, J.; Ward, M. P.; Wills, R.

In: Zoonoses and Public Health, Vol. 57, No. 2, 01.03.2010, p. 95-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Connor, AM, Sargeant, JM, Gardner, I, Dickson, JS, Torrence, ME, Dewey, CE, Dohoo, IR, Evans, RB, Gray, JT, Greiner, M, Keefe, G, Lefebvre, SL, Morley, PS, Ramirez, A, Sischo, W, Smith, DR, Snedeker, K, Sofos, J, Ward, MP & Wills, R 2010, 'The reflect statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement', Zoonoses and Public Health, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 95-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01311.x
O'Connor, A. M. ; Sargeant, J. M. ; Gardner, Ian ; Dickson, J. S. ; Torrence, M. E. ; Dewey, C. E. ; Dohoo, I. R. ; Evans, R. B. ; Gray, J. T. ; Greiner, M. ; Keefe, G. ; Lefebvre, S. L. ; Morley, P. S. ; Ramirez, A. ; Sischo, W. ; Smith, D. R. ; Snedeker, K. ; Sofos, J. ; Ward, M. P. ; Wills, R. / The reflect statement : Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement. In: Zoonoses and Public Health. 2010 ; Vol. 57, No. 2. pp. 95-104.
@article{47976908da9341749afb511bc066d017,
title = "The reflect statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement",
abstract = "Summary The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on 18-19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food-safety outcomes.",
keywords = "Challenge studies and standards, Livestock, Randomized trials",
author = "O'Connor, {A. M.} and Sargeant, {J. M.} and Ian Gardner and Dickson, {J. S.} and Torrence, {M. E.} and Dewey, {C. E.} and Dohoo, {I. R.} and Evans, {R. B.} and Gray, {J. T.} and M. Greiner and G. Keefe and Lefebvre, {S. L.} and Morley, {P. S.} and A. Ramirez and W. Sischo and Smith, {D. R.} and K. Snedeker and J. Sofos and Ward, {M. P.} and R. Wills",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01311.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "95--104",
journal = "Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health",
issn = "1863-1959",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The reflect statement

T2 - Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the consort statement

AU - O'Connor, A. M.

AU - Sargeant, J. M.

AU - Gardner, Ian

AU - Dickson, J. S.

AU - Torrence, M. E.

AU - Dewey, C. E.

AU - Dohoo, I. R.

AU - Evans, R. B.

AU - Gray, J. T.

AU - Greiner, M.

AU - Keefe, G.

AU - Lefebvre, S. L.

AU - Morley, P. S.

AU - Ramirez, A.

AU - Sischo, W.

AU - Smith, D. R.

AU - Snedeker, K.

AU - Sofos, J.

AU - Ward, M. P.

AU - Wills, R.

PY - 2010/3/1

Y1 - 2010/3/1

N2 - Summary The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on 18-19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food-safety outcomes.

AB - Summary The conduct of randomized controlled trials in livestock with production, health and food-safety outcomes presents unique challenges that may not be adequately reported in trial reports. The objective of this project was to modify the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to reflect the unique aspects of reporting these livestock trials. A 2-day consensus meeting was held on 18-19 November 2008 in Chicago, IL, USA, to achieve the objective. Prior to the meeting, a Web-based survey was conducted to identify issues for discussion. The 24 attendees were biostatisticians, epidemiologists, food-safety researchers, livestock-production specialists, journal editors, assistant editors and associate editors. Prior to the meeting, the attendees completed a Web-based survey indicating which CONSORT statement items may need to be modified to address unique issues for livestock trials. The consensus meeting resulted in the production of the REFLECT (Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Control Trials) statement for livestock and food safety and 22-item checklist. Fourteen items were modified from the CONSORT checklist and an additional sub-item was proposed to address challenge trials. The REFLECT statement proposes new terminology, more consistent with common usage in livestock production, to describe study subjects. Evidence was not always available to support modification to or inclusion of an item. The use of the REFLECT statement, which addresses issues unique to livestock trials, should improve the quality of reporting and design for trials reporting production, health and food-safety outcomes.

KW - Challenge studies and standards

KW - Livestock

KW - Randomized trials

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76749089662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76749089662&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01311.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01311.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20070653

AN - SCOPUS:76749089662

VL - 57

SP - 95

EP - 104

JO - Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health

JF - Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B: Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health

SN - 1863-1959

IS - 2

ER -