The physician's role in the distribution of limited resources

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The physician must routinely decide whether to use limited resources for an individual patient and may be tempted to justify denial of care in an attempt to conserve resources for other current and future patients. This justification puts the physician's fiduciary duty to the individual patient in jeopardy. However, if the physician abdicates the role of decision-maker, it may be undertaken by someone whose interests conflict with those of the patient, such as a third party payer. The case presentation in this article illustrates some of the features of this dilemma, and the case discussion argues that the physician's fiduciary duty to an individual patient supercedes any duty to ensure equitable distribution of resources. However, outside of this primary fiduciary duty, physicians have a separate duty to prospectively study treatment outcomes and use this information to ensure that resources are distributed appropriately.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)83-87
Number of pages5
JournalTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Volume6
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Physician's Role
Physicians
Health Insurance Reimbursement
Conflict of Interest

Keywords

  • Allocation of health care resources
  • Bioethics
  • Ethics
  • Justice
  • Spinal cord injury rehabilitation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The physician's role in the distribution of limited resources. / James, Michelle.

In: Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2001, p. 83-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f89131322da04f2e8d0cd837644ae857,
title = "The physician's role in the distribution of limited resources",
abstract = "The physician must routinely decide whether to use limited resources for an individual patient and may be tempted to justify denial of care in an attempt to conserve resources for other current and future patients. This justification puts the physician's fiduciary duty to the individual patient in jeopardy. However, if the physician abdicates the role of decision-maker, it may be undertaken by someone whose interests conflict with those of the patient, such as a third party payer. The case presentation in this article illustrates some of the features of this dilemma, and the case discussion argues that the physician's fiduciary duty to an individual patient supercedes any duty to ensure equitable distribution of resources. However, outside of this primary fiduciary duty, physicians have a separate duty to prospectively study treatment outcomes and use this information to ensure that resources are distributed appropriately.",
keywords = "Allocation of health care resources, Bioethics, Ethics, Justice, Spinal cord injury rehabilitation",
author = "Michelle James",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "83--87",
journal = "Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation",
issn = "1082-0744",
publisher = "Thomas Land Publishers Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The physician's role in the distribution of limited resources

AU - James, Michelle

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - The physician must routinely decide whether to use limited resources for an individual patient and may be tempted to justify denial of care in an attempt to conserve resources for other current and future patients. This justification puts the physician's fiduciary duty to the individual patient in jeopardy. However, if the physician abdicates the role of decision-maker, it may be undertaken by someone whose interests conflict with those of the patient, such as a third party payer. The case presentation in this article illustrates some of the features of this dilemma, and the case discussion argues that the physician's fiduciary duty to an individual patient supercedes any duty to ensure equitable distribution of resources. However, outside of this primary fiduciary duty, physicians have a separate duty to prospectively study treatment outcomes and use this information to ensure that resources are distributed appropriately.

AB - The physician must routinely decide whether to use limited resources for an individual patient and may be tempted to justify denial of care in an attempt to conserve resources for other current and future patients. This justification puts the physician's fiduciary duty to the individual patient in jeopardy. However, if the physician abdicates the role of decision-maker, it may be undertaken by someone whose interests conflict with those of the patient, such as a third party payer. The case presentation in this article illustrates some of the features of this dilemma, and the case discussion argues that the physician's fiduciary duty to an individual patient supercedes any duty to ensure equitable distribution of resources. However, outside of this primary fiduciary duty, physicians have a separate duty to prospectively study treatment outcomes and use this information to ensure that resources are distributed appropriately.

KW - Allocation of health care resources

KW - Bioethics

KW - Ethics

KW - Justice

KW - Spinal cord injury rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035074312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035074312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035074312

VL - 6

SP - 83

EP - 87

JO - Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

JF - Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

SN - 1082-0744

IS - 4

ER -