The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism

Hilde M. Geurts, Blythe Corbett, Marjorie Solomon Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

213 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-82
Number of pages9
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Autistic Disorder
Research Personnel
Autism Spectrum Disorder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism. / Geurts, Hilde M.; Corbett, Blythe; Friedman, Marjorie Solomon.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 13, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 74-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Geurts, Hilde M. ; Corbett, Blythe ; Friedman, Marjorie Solomon. / The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2009 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 74-82.
@article{527e042a341e4f598551ca1a61f6cdf9,
title = "The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism",
abstract = "We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.",
author = "Geurts, {Hilde M.} and Blythe Corbett and Friedman, {Marjorie Solomon}",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "74--82",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism

AU - Geurts, Hilde M.

AU - Corbett, Blythe

AU - Friedman, Marjorie Solomon

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.

AB - We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59049091690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59049091690&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 19138551

AN - SCOPUS:59049091690

VL - 13

SP - 74

EP - 82

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 2

ER -