The next generation of doctoring

Michael S Wilkes, Jerome R. Hoffman, Stuart J. Slavin, Richard P. Usatine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors reflect on the creation of the Doctoring program at the UCLA School of Medicine two decades ago. Although Doctoring - at UCLA and other institutions where it has been implemented - has successfully taught large numbers of students psychosocial content and communications skills that are often overlooked in traditional medical school curricula and has had an impact on the larger culture of medical education, the authors believe that its full promise remains unfulfilled. Of the many practical difficulties they encountered in creating and implementing this comprehensive program, the greatest barriers, by far, were cultural. The authors argue that the impact of programs like Doctoring - programs that attempt not only to change the content of what students learn but also to encourage students to think critically and to question fundamental aspects of the way medicine is taught, learned, and practiced - cannot grow unless and until the larger culture of medicine also changes. They offer recommendations for overcoming barriers to improve the next generation of Doctoring and similar programs; these include changing the philosophy behind the selection of medical students, providing far greater resources and support for course faculty, and altering incentives for medical school faculty. They conclude that until major cultural and structural barriers are overcome and the values that Doctoring and like programs attempt to engender become the primary values of the larger culture they seek to change, these programs will continue in fundamental ways to function outside the dominant culture of medicine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)438-441
Number of pages4
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Medicine
Students
Medical Schools
medicine
Medical Faculties
Medical Education
Medical Students
Curriculum
Motivation
school
Communication
student
communication skills
medical student
incentive
curriculum
resources
Values
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Wilkes, M. S., Hoffman, J. R., Slavin, S. J., & Usatine, R. P. (2013). The next generation of doctoring. Academic Medicine, 88(4), 438-441. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318285b019

The next generation of doctoring. / Wilkes, Michael S; Hoffman, Jerome R.; Slavin, Stuart J.; Usatine, Richard P.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 88, No. 4, 04.2013, p. 438-441.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilkes, MS, Hoffman, JR, Slavin, SJ & Usatine, RP 2013, 'The next generation of doctoring', Academic Medicine, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 438-441. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318285b019
Wilkes, Michael S ; Hoffman, Jerome R. ; Slavin, Stuart J. ; Usatine, Richard P. / The next generation of doctoring. In: Academic Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 438-441.
@article{3d15f74ff9a547d69e34d73e781376ac,
title = "The next generation of doctoring",
abstract = "The authors reflect on the creation of the Doctoring program at the UCLA School of Medicine two decades ago. Although Doctoring - at UCLA and other institutions where it has been implemented - has successfully taught large numbers of students psychosocial content and communications skills that are often overlooked in traditional medical school curricula and has had an impact on the larger culture of medical education, the authors believe that its full promise remains unfulfilled. Of the many practical difficulties they encountered in creating and implementing this comprehensive program, the greatest barriers, by far, were cultural. The authors argue that the impact of programs like Doctoring - programs that attempt not only to change the content of what students learn but also to encourage students to think critically and to question fundamental aspects of the way medicine is taught, learned, and practiced - cannot grow unless and until the larger culture of medicine also changes. They offer recommendations for overcoming barriers to improve the next generation of Doctoring and similar programs; these include changing the philosophy behind the selection of medical students, providing far greater resources and support for course faculty, and altering incentives for medical school faculty. They conclude that until major cultural and structural barriers are overcome and the values that Doctoring and like programs attempt to engender become the primary values of the larger culture they seek to change, these programs will continue in fundamental ways to function outside the dominant culture of medicine.",
author = "Wilkes, {Michael S} and Hoffman, {Jerome R.} and Slavin, {Stuart J.} and Usatine, {Richard P.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e318285b019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "438--441",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The next generation of doctoring

AU - Wilkes, Michael S

AU - Hoffman, Jerome R.

AU - Slavin, Stuart J.

AU - Usatine, Richard P.

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - The authors reflect on the creation of the Doctoring program at the UCLA School of Medicine two decades ago. Although Doctoring - at UCLA and other institutions where it has been implemented - has successfully taught large numbers of students psychosocial content and communications skills that are often overlooked in traditional medical school curricula and has had an impact on the larger culture of medical education, the authors believe that its full promise remains unfulfilled. Of the many practical difficulties they encountered in creating and implementing this comprehensive program, the greatest barriers, by far, were cultural. The authors argue that the impact of programs like Doctoring - programs that attempt not only to change the content of what students learn but also to encourage students to think critically and to question fundamental aspects of the way medicine is taught, learned, and practiced - cannot grow unless and until the larger culture of medicine also changes. They offer recommendations for overcoming barriers to improve the next generation of Doctoring and similar programs; these include changing the philosophy behind the selection of medical students, providing far greater resources and support for course faculty, and altering incentives for medical school faculty. They conclude that until major cultural and structural barriers are overcome and the values that Doctoring and like programs attempt to engender become the primary values of the larger culture they seek to change, these programs will continue in fundamental ways to function outside the dominant culture of medicine.

AB - The authors reflect on the creation of the Doctoring program at the UCLA School of Medicine two decades ago. Although Doctoring - at UCLA and other institutions where it has been implemented - has successfully taught large numbers of students psychosocial content and communications skills that are often overlooked in traditional medical school curricula and has had an impact on the larger culture of medical education, the authors believe that its full promise remains unfulfilled. Of the many practical difficulties they encountered in creating and implementing this comprehensive program, the greatest barriers, by far, were cultural. The authors argue that the impact of programs like Doctoring - programs that attempt not only to change the content of what students learn but also to encourage students to think critically and to question fundamental aspects of the way medicine is taught, learned, and practiced - cannot grow unless and until the larger culture of medicine also changes. They offer recommendations for overcoming barriers to improve the next generation of Doctoring and similar programs; these include changing the philosophy behind the selection of medical students, providing far greater resources and support for course faculty, and altering incentives for medical school faculty. They conclude that until major cultural and structural barriers are overcome and the values that Doctoring and like programs attempt to engender become the primary values of the larger culture they seek to change, these programs will continue in fundamental ways to function outside the dominant culture of medicine.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875848883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875848883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318285b019

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318285b019

M3 - Article

C2 - 23531757

AN - SCOPUS:84875848883

VL - 88

SP - 438

EP - 441

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 4

ER -