The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice

Michele C Lim, Roma P. Patel, Victor S. Lee, Patricia D. Weeks, Martha K. Barber, Mitchell R. Watnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. To examine financial and clinical work productivity outcomes associated with the use of the electronic health record (EHR). Methods. 191,360 billable clinical encounters were analyzed for 12 clinical providers over a 9-year study period during which an EHR was implemented. Main outcome measures were clinical revenues collected per provider and secondary outcomes were charge capture, patient visit coding levels, transcription costs, patient visit volume per provider, digital drawing, and digital imaging volume. Results. The difference in inflation adjusted net clinical revenue per provider per year did not change significantly in the period after EHR implementation (mean = $404,198; SD = $17,912) than before (mean = $411,420; SD = $39,366) (P=0.746). Charge capture, the proportion of higher- and lower-level visit codes for new and established patients, and patient visits per provider remained stable. A total savings of $188,951 in transcription costs occurred over a 4-year time period post-EHR implementation. The rate of drawing the ophthalmic exam in the EHR was low (mean = 2.28%; SD = 0.05%) for all providers. Conclusions. This study did not show a clear financial gain after EHR implementation in an academic ophthalmology practice. Ophthalmologists do not rely on drawings to document the ophthalmic exam; instead, the ophthalmic exam becomes text-driven in a paperless world.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number329819
JournalJournal of Ophthalmology
Volume2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 24 2015

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Ophthalmology
Costs and Cost Analysis
Economic Inflation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice. / Lim, Michele C; Patel, Roma P.; Lee, Victor S.; Weeks, Patricia D.; Barber, Martha K.; Watnik, Mitchell R.

In: Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 2015, 329819, 24.02.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lim, Michele C ; Patel, Roma P. ; Lee, Victor S. ; Weeks, Patricia D. ; Barber, Martha K. ; Watnik, Mitchell R. / The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice. In: Journal of Ophthalmology. 2015 ; Vol. 2015.
@article{19dbc1aa5b82436cbb687079e169dcb0,
title = "The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice",
abstract = "Purpose. To examine financial and clinical work productivity outcomes associated with the use of the electronic health record (EHR). Methods. 191,360 billable clinical encounters were analyzed for 12 clinical providers over a 9-year study period during which an EHR was implemented. Main outcome measures were clinical revenues collected per provider and secondary outcomes were charge capture, patient visit coding levels, transcription costs, patient visit volume per provider, digital drawing, and digital imaging volume. Results. The difference in inflation adjusted net clinical revenue per provider per year did not change significantly in the period after EHR implementation (mean = $404,198; SD = $17,912) than before (mean = $411,420; SD = $39,366) (P=0.746). Charge capture, the proportion of higher- and lower-level visit codes for new and established patients, and patient visits per provider remained stable. A total savings of $188,951 in transcription costs occurred over a 4-year time period post-EHR implementation. The rate of drawing the ophthalmic exam in the EHR was low (mean = 2.28{\%}; SD = 0.05{\%}) for all providers. Conclusions. This study did not show a clear financial gain after EHR implementation in an academic ophthalmology practice. Ophthalmologists do not rely on drawings to document the ophthalmic exam; instead, the ophthalmic exam becomes text-driven in a paperless world.",
author = "Lim, {Michele C} and Patel, {Roma P.} and Lee, {Victor S.} and Weeks, {Patricia D.} and Barber, {Martha K.} and Watnik, {Mitchell R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1155/2015/329819",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2015",
journal = "Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "2090-004X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The long-term financial and clinical impact of an electronic health record on an academic ophthalmology practice

AU - Lim, Michele C

AU - Patel, Roma P.

AU - Lee, Victor S.

AU - Weeks, Patricia D.

AU - Barber, Martha K.

AU - Watnik, Mitchell R.

PY - 2015/2/24

Y1 - 2015/2/24

N2 - Purpose. To examine financial and clinical work productivity outcomes associated with the use of the electronic health record (EHR). Methods. 191,360 billable clinical encounters were analyzed for 12 clinical providers over a 9-year study period during which an EHR was implemented. Main outcome measures were clinical revenues collected per provider and secondary outcomes were charge capture, patient visit coding levels, transcription costs, patient visit volume per provider, digital drawing, and digital imaging volume. Results. The difference in inflation adjusted net clinical revenue per provider per year did not change significantly in the period after EHR implementation (mean = $404,198; SD = $17,912) than before (mean = $411,420; SD = $39,366) (P=0.746). Charge capture, the proportion of higher- and lower-level visit codes for new and established patients, and patient visits per provider remained stable. A total savings of $188,951 in transcription costs occurred over a 4-year time period post-EHR implementation. The rate of drawing the ophthalmic exam in the EHR was low (mean = 2.28%; SD = 0.05%) for all providers. Conclusions. This study did not show a clear financial gain after EHR implementation in an academic ophthalmology practice. Ophthalmologists do not rely on drawings to document the ophthalmic exam; instead, the ophthalmic exam becomes text-driven in a paperless world.

AB - Purpose. To examine financial and clinical work productivity outcomes associated with the use of the electronic health record (EHR). Methods. 191,360 billable clinical encounters were analyzed for 12 clinical providers over a 9-year study period during which an EHR was implemented. Main outcome measures were clinical revenues collected per provider and secondary outcomes were charge capture, patient visit coding levels, transcription costs, patient visit volume per provider, digital drawing, and digital imaging volume. Results. The difference in inflation adjusted net clinical revenue per provider per year did not change significantly in the period after EHR implementation (mean = $404,198; SD = $17,912) than before (mean = $411,420; SD = $39,366) (P=0.746). Charge capture, the proportion of higher- and lower-level visit codes for new and established patients, and patient visits per provider remained stable. A total savings of $188,951 in transcription costs occurred over a 4-year time period post-EHR implementation. The rate of drawing the ophthalmic exam in the EHR was low (mean = 2.28%; SD = 0.05%) for all providers. Conclusions. This study did not show a clear financial gain after EHR implementation in an academic ophthalmology practice. Ophthalmologists do not rely on drawings to document the ophthalmic exam; instead, the ophthalmic exam becomes text-driven in a paperless world.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924589125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924589125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1155/2015/329819

DO - 10.1155/2015/329819

M3 - Article

VL - 2015

JO - Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 2090-004X

M1 - 329819

ER -