The impact of spikes in handgun acquisitions on firearm-related harms

Hannah S Laqueur, Rose M.C. Kagawa, Christopher D. McCort, Rocco Pallin, Garen J Wintemute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Research has documented sharp and short-lived increases in firearm acquisitions immediately following high-profile mass shootings and specific elections, increasing exposure to firearms at the community level. We exploit cross-city variation in the estimated number of excess handgun acquisitions in California following the 2012 presidential election and the Sandy Hook school shooting 5 weeks later to assess whether the additional handguns were associated with increases in the rate of firearm-related harms at the city level. Methods: We use a two-stage modeling approach. First, we estimate excess handguns as the difference between actual handgun acquisitions, as recorded in California's Dealer Record of Sales, and expected acquisitions, as predicted by a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving-average (SARIMA) time series model. We use Poisson regression models to estimate the effect of city-level excess handgun purchasing on city-level changes in rates of firearm mortality and injury. Results: We estimate there were 36,142 excess handguns acquired in California in the 11 weeks following the election (95% prediction interval: 22,780 to 49,505); the Sandy Hook shooting occurred in week 6. We find city-level purchasing spikes were associated with higher rates of firearm injury in the 52 weeks post-election: a relative rate of 1.044 firearm injuries for each excess handgun per 1,000 people (95% CI: 1.000 to 1.089). This amounts to approximately 290 (95% CI: 0 to 616) additional firearm injuries (roughly a 4% increase) in California over the year. We do not detect statistically significant associations for shorter time windows or for firearm mortality. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for an association between excess handgun acquisitions following high-profile events and firearm injury at the community level. This suggests that even marginal increases in handgun prevalence may be impactful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number35
JournalInjury Epidemiology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 26 2019

Fingerprint

Firearms
Wounds and Injuries
Mortality

Keywords

  • Elections
  • Firearm injury
  • Handguns
  • Mass shootings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The impact of spikes in handgun acquisitions on firearm-related harms. / Laqueur, Hannah S; Kagawa, Rose M.C.; McCort, Christopher D.; Pallin, Rocco; Wintemute, Garen J.

In: Injury Epidemiology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 35, 26.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Laqueur, Hannah S ; Kagawa, Rose M.C. ; McCort, Christopher D. ; Pallin, Rocco ; Wintemute, Garen J. / The impact of spikes in handgun acquisitions on firearm-related harms. In: Injury Epidemiology. 2019 ; Vol. 6, No. 1.
@article{efed48c65d6547d2ba6f7a8a08557103,
title = "The impact of spikes in handgun acquisitions on firearm-related harms",
abstract = "Background: Research has documented sharp and short-lived increases in firearm acquisitions immediately following high-profile mass shootings and specific elections, increasing exposure to firearms at the community level. We exploit cross-city variation in the estimated number of excess handgun acquisitions in California following the 2012 presidential election and the Sandy Hook school shooting 5 weeks later to assess whether the additional handguns were associated with increases in the rate of firearm-related harms at the city level. Methods: We use a two-stage modeling approach. First, we estimate excess handguns as the difference between actual handgun acquisitions, as recorded in California's Dealer Record of Sales, and expected acquisitions, as predicted by a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving-average (SARIMA) time series model. We use Poisson regression models to estimate the effect of city-level excess handgun purchasing on city-level changes in rates of firearm mortality and injury. Results: We estimate there were 36,142 excess handguns acquired in California in the 11 weeks following the election (95{\%} prediction interval: 22,780 to 49,505); the Sandy Hook shooting occurred in week 6. We find city-level purchasing spikes were associated with higher rates of firearm injury in the 52 weeks post-election: a relative rate of 1.044 firearm injuries for each excess handgun per 1,000 people (95{\%} CI: 1.000 to 1.089). This amounts to approximately 290 (95{\%} CI: 0 to 616) additional firearm injuries (roughly a 4{\%} increase) in California over the year. We do not detect statistically significant associations for shorter time windows or for firearm mortality. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for an association between excess handgun acquisitions following high-profile events and firearm injury at the community level. This suggests that even marginal increases in handgun prevalence may be impactful.",
keywords = "Elections, Firearm injury, Handguns, Mass shootings",
author = "Laqueur, {Hannah S} and Kagawa, {Rose M.C.} and McCort, {Christopher D.} and Rocco Pallin and Wintemute, {Garen J}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1186/s40621-019-0212-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Injury Epidemiology",
issn = "2197-1714",
publisher = "SpringerOpen",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of spikes in handgun acquisitions on firearm-related harms

AU - Laqueur, Hannah S

AU - Kagawa, Rose M.C.

AU - McCort, Christopher D.

AU - Pallin, Rocco

AU - Wintemute, Garen J

PY - 2019/8/26

Y1 - 2019/8/26

N2 - Background: Research has documented sharp and short-lived increases in firearm acquisitions immediately following high-profile mass shootings and specific elections, increasing exposure to firearms at the community level. We exploit cross-city variation in the estimated number of excess handgun acquisitions in California following the 2012 presidential election and the Sandy Hook school shooting 5 weeks later to assess whether the additional handguns were associated with increases in the rate of firearm-related harms at the city level. Methods: We use a two-stage modeling approach. First, we estimate excess handguns as the difference between actual handgun acquisitions, as recorded in California's Dealer Record of Sales, and expected acquisitions, as predicted by a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving-average (SARIMA) time series model. We use Poisson regression models to estimate the effect of city-level excess handgun purchasing on city-level changes in rates of firearm mortality and injury. Results: We estimate there were 36,142 excess handguns acquired in California in the 11 weeks following the election (95% prediction interval: 22,780 to 49,505); the Sandy Hook shooting occurred in week 6. We find city-level purchasing spikes were associated with higher rates of firearm injury in the 52 weeks post-election: a relative rate of 1.044 firearm injuries for each excess handgun per 1,000 people (95% CI: 1.000 to 1.089). This amounts to approximately 290 (95% CI: 0 to 616) additional firearm injuries (roughly a 4% increase) in California over the year. We do not detect statistically significant associations for shorter time windows or for firearm mortality. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for an association between excess handgun acquisitions following high-profile events and firearm injury at the community level. This suggests that even marginal increases in handgun prevalence may be impactful.

AB - Background: Research has documented sharp and short-lived increases in firearm acquisitions immediately following high-profile mass shootings and specific elections, increasing exposure to firearms at the community level. We exploit cross-city variation in the estimated number of excess handgun acquisitions in California following the 2012 presidential election and the Sandy Hook school shooting 5 weeks later to assess whether the additional handguns were associated with increases in the rate of firearm-related harms at the city level. Methods: We use a two-stage modeling approach. First, we estimate excess handguns as the difference between actual handgun acquisitions, as recorded in California's Dealer Record of Sales, and expected acquisitions, as predicted by a seasonal autoregressive integrated moving-average (SARIMA) time series model. We use Poisson regression models to estimate the effect of city-level excess handgun purchasing on city-level changes in rates of firearm mortality and injury. Results: We estimate there were 36,142 excess handguns acquired in California in the 11 weeks following the election (95% prediction interval: 22,780 to 49,505); the Sandy Hook shooting occurred in week 6. We find city-level purchasing spikes were associated with higher rates of firearm injury in the 52 weeks post-election: a relative rate of 1.044 firearm injuries for each excess handgun per 1,000 people (95% CI: 1.000 to 1.089). This amounts to approximately 290 (95% CI: 0 to 616) additional firearm injuries (roughly a 4% increase) in California over the year. We do not detect statistically significant associations for shorter time windows or for firearm mortality. Conclusion: This study provides evidence for an association between excess handgun acquisitions following high-profile events and firearm injury at the community level. This suggests that even marginal increases in handgun prevalence may be impactful.

KW - Elections

KW - Firearm injury

KW - Handguns

KW - Mass shootings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071644685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071644685&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s40621-019-0212-0

DO - 10.1186/s40621-019-0212-0

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85071644685

VL - 6

JO - Injury Epidemiology

JF - Injury Epidemiology

SN - 2197-1714

IS - 1

M1 - 35

ER -