The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance

Aileen M. Gariepy, Erica J. Simon, Divya A. Patel, Mitchell D Creinin, Eleanor Schwarz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket expense on intrauterine device (IUD) utilization among women with private insurance. Study Design: We reviewed the records of all women with private insurance who requested an IUD for contraception from an urban academic gynecology practice from May 2007 through April 2008. For each patient, we determined the out-of-pocket expense that would be incurred and whether she ultimately had an IUD placed. The total charge for placement of a copper or levonorgestrel IUD (including the device) was $815. Results: Ninety-five women requested an IUD during the study period. The distribution of out-of-pocket expense was bimodal: less than $50 for 35 (37%) women and greater than $500 for 52 (55%) women. Intrauterine device insertion occurred in 24 (25%) women, 19 of whom had an out-of-pocket expense less than $50. In univariate and multivariable analysis, women with insurance coverage that resulted in less than $50 out-of-pocket expense for the IUD were more likely to have an IUD placed than women required to pay $50 or more (adjusted odds ratio=11.4, 95% confidence interval=3.6-36.6). Conclusions: Women requesting an IUD for contraception are significantly more likely to have an IUD placed when out-of-pocket expense is less than $50.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalContraception
Volume84
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Intrauterine Devices
Health Expenditures
Insurance
Contraception
Levonorgestrel
Insurance Coverage
Gynecology
Copper
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Contraception
  • Insurance
  • IUD
  • Out-of-pocket expense

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance. / Gariepy, Aileen M.; Simon, Erica J.; Patel, Divya A.; Creinin, Mitchell D; Schwarz, Eleanor.

In: Contraception, Vol. 84, No. 6, 12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8d021b256a94efc8c9fdff9b414ad4c,
title = "The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance",
abstract = "Background: The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket expense on intrauterine device (IUD) utilization among women with private insurance. Study Design: We reviewed the records of all women with private insurance who requested an IUD for contraception from an urban academic gynecology practice from May 2007 through April 2008. For each patient, we determined the out-of-pocket expense that would be incurred and whether she ultimately had an IUD placed. The total charge for placement of a copper or levonorgestrel IUD (including the device) was $815. Results: Ninety-five women requested an IUD during the study period. The distribution of out-of-pocket expense was bimodal: less than $50 for 35 (37{\%}) women and greater than $500 for 52 (55{\%}) women. Intrauterine device insertion occurred in 24 (25{\%}) women, 19 of whom had an out-of-pocket expense less than $50. In univariate and multivariable analysis, women with insurance coverage that resulted in less than $50 out-of-pocket expense for the IUD were more likely to have an IUD placed than women required to pay $50 or more (adjusted odds ratio=11.4, 95{\%} confidence interval=3.6-36.6). Conclusions: Women requesting an IUD for contraception are significantly more likely to have an IUD placed when out-of-pocket expense is less than $50.",
keywords = "Contraception, Insurance, IUD, Out-of-pocket expense",
author = "Gariepy, {Aileen M.} and Simon, {Erica J.} and Patel, {Divya A.} and Creinin, {Mitchell D} and Eleanor Schwarz",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance

AU - Gariepy, Aileen M.

AU - Simon, Erica J.

AU - Patel, Divya A.

AU - Creinin, Mitchell D

AU - Schwarz, Eleanor

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Background: The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket expense on intrauterine device (IUD) utilization among women with private insurance. Study Design: We reviewed the records of all women with private insurance who requested an IUD for contraception from an urban academic gynecology practice from May 2007 through April 2008. For each patient, we determined the out-of-pocket expense that would be incurred and whether she ultimately had an IUD placed. The total charge for placement of a copper or levonorgestrel IUD (including the device) was $815. Results: Ninety-five women requested an IUD during the study period. The distribution of out-of-pocket expense was bimodal: less than $50 for 35 (37%) women and greater than $500 for 52 (55%) women. Intrauterine device insertion occurred in 24 (25%) women, 19 of whom had an out-of-pocket expense less than $50. In univariate and multivariable analysis, women with insurance coverage that resulted in less than $50 out-of-pocket expense for the IUD were more likely to have an IUD placed than women required to pay $50 or more (adjusted odds ratio=11.4, 95% confidence interval=3.6-36.6). Conclusions: Women requesting an IUD for contraception are significantly more likely to have an IUD placed when out-of-pocket expense is less than $50.

AB - Background: The study was conducted to evaluate the impact of out-of-pocket expense on intrauterine device (IUD) utilization among women with private insurance. Study Design: We reviewed the records of all women with private insurance who requested an IUD for contraception from an urban academic gynecology practice from May 2007 through April 2008. For each patient, we determined the out-of-pocket expense that would be incurred and whether she ultimately had an IUD placed. The total charge for placement of a copper or levonorgestrel IUD (including the device) was $815. Results: Ninety-five women requested an IUD during the study period. The distribution of out-of-pocket expense was bimodal: less than $50 for 35 (37%) women and greater than $500 for 52 (55%) women. Intrauterine device insertion occurred in 24 (25%) women, 19 of whom had an out-of-pocket expense less than $50. In univariate and multivariable analysis, women with insurance coverage that resulted in less than $50 out-of-pocket expense for the IUD were more likely to have an IUD placed than women required to pay $50 or more (adjusted odds ratio=11.4, 95% confidence interval=3.6-36.6). Conclusions: Women requesting an IUD for contraception are significantly more likely to have an IUD placed when out-of-pocket expense is less than $50.

KW - Contraception

KW - Insurance

KW - IUD

KW - Out-of-pocket expense

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81155150091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81155150091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 22078204

AN - SCOPUS:81155150091

VL - 84

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 6

ER -