The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis

Hung S Ho, K. A. Mathiesen, B. M. Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There has been a debate about the cost-effectiveness of Iaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as well as a concern regarding its possible overutilization and changes in the indication for surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all cholecystectomies performed at UCDMC from 1988 to 1994 was done. The annual rate of cholecystectomy increased by 50% in 1990 when LC was introduced but has since stabilized at a rate 11 % higher than the rate before LC. The disease status and severity did not change. Results: The incidence of nonelective surgery remained stable at 31.2% to 37.5%. Elective cholecystectomy had lower mortality (0.16% vs 1.8%, P = 0.029), morbidity (2.6% vs 11.2%, P = 0.0001), and conversion rate (2.6% vs 16%, P = 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (2.1 days vs 5.4 days), compared with nonelective procedure. Conclusions: The indication for surgery in cholelithiasis has not changed since the introduction of LC. In patients with symptomatic gallstones, early elective surgery is recommended and may be more cost-effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)746-750
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy
Volume10
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jul 1996

Fingerprint

Cholelithiasis
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy
Gallstones
Therapeutics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Length of Stay
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Incidence

Keywords

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Elective vs nonelective surgery
  • Indication for surgery
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. / Ho, Hung S; Mathiesen, K. A.; Wolfe, B. M.

In: Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 10, No. 7, 07.1996, p. 746-750.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ho, Hung S ; Mathiesen, K. A. ; Wolfe, B. M. / The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. In: Surgical Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 10, No. 7. pp. 746-750.
@article{814ebb98d5874f6988072669c2ebac2d,
title = "The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis",
abstract = "Background: There has been a debate about the cost-effectiveness of Iaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as well as a concern regarding its possible overutilization and changes in the indication for surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all cholecystectomies performed at UCDMC from 1988 to 1994 was done. The annual rate of cholecystectomy increased by 50{\%} in 1990 when LC was introduced but has since stabilized at a rate 11 {\%} higher than the rate before LC. The disease status and severity did not change. Results: The incidence of nonelective surgery remained stable at 31.2{\%} to 37.5{\%}. Elective cholecystectomy had lower mortality (0.16{\%} vs 1.8{\%}, P = 0.029), morbidity (2.6{\%} vs 11.2{\%}, P = 0.0001), and conversion rate (2.6{\%} vs 16{\%}, P = 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (2.1 days vs 5.4 days), compared with nonelective procedure. Conclusions: The indication for surgery in cholelithiasis has not changed since the introduction of LC. In patients with symptomatic gallstones, early elective surgery is recommended and may be more cost-effective.",
keywords = "Cholelithiasis, Elective vs nonelective surgery, Indication for surgery, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy",
author = "Ho, {Hung S} and Mathiesen, {K. A.} and Wolfe, {B. M.}",
year = "1996",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "746--750",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis

AU - Ho, Hung S

AU - Mathiesen, K. A.

AU - Wolfe, B. M.

PY - 1996/7

Y1 - 1996/7

N2 - Background: There has been a debate about the cost-effectiveness of Iaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as well as a concern regarding its possible overutilization and changes in the indication for surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all cholecystectomies performed at UCDMC from 1988 to 1994 was done. The annual rate of cholecystectomy increased by 50% in 1990 when LC was introduced but has since stabilized at a rate 11 % higher than the rate before LC. The disease status and severity did not change. Results: The incidence of nonelective surgery remained stable at 31.2% to 37.5%. Elective cholecystectomy had lower mortality (0.16% vs 1.8%, P = 0.029), morbidity (2.6% vs 11.2%, P = 0.0001), and conversion rate (2.6% vs 16%, P = 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (2.1 days vs 5.4 days), compared with nonelective procedure. Conclusions: The indication for surgery in cholelithiasis has not changed since the introduction of LC. In patients with symptomatic gallstones, early elective surgery is recommended and may be more cost-effective.

AB - Background: There has been a debate about the cost-effectiveness of Iaparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), as well as a concern regarding its possible overutilization and changes in the indication for surgery. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all cholecystectomies performed at UCDMC from 1988 to 1994 was done. The annual rate of cholecystectomy increased by 50% in 1990 when LC was introduced but has since stabilized at a rate 11 % higher than the rate before LC. The disease status and severity did not change. Results: The incidence of nonelective surgery remained stable at 31.2% to 37.5%. Elective cholecystectomy had lower mortality (0.16% vs 1.8%, P = 0.029), morbidity (2.6% vs 11.2%, P = 0.0001), and conversion rate (2.6% vs 16%, P = 0.0001) and a shorter length of stay (2.1 days vs 5.4 days), compared with nonelective procedure. Conclusions: The indication for surgery in cholelithiasis has not changed since the introduction of LC. In patients with symptomatic gallstones, early elective surgery is recommended and may be more cost-effective.

KW - Cholelithiasis

KW - Elective vs nonelective surgery

KW - Indication for surgery

KW - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030191648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030191648&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8662432

AN - SCOPUS:0030191648

VL - 10

SP - 746

EP - 750

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 7

ER -