The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction: The ENRICHD experience

Patrice G. Saab, Heejung Bang, Redford B. Williams, Lynda H. Powell, Neil Schneiderman, Carl Thoresen, Matthew Burg, Francis Keefe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Although the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) treatment was designed to include individual therapy and cognitive behavioral group training for patients with depression and/or low perceived social support, only 31% of treated participants received group training. Secondary analyses classified intervention participants into two subgroups, (1) individual therapy only or (2) group training (i.e., coping skills training) plus individual therapy, to determine whether medical outcomes differed in participants who received the combination of group training and individual therapy compared to participants who received individual therapy only or usual care. Methods: Secondary analyses of 1243 usual care, 781 individual therapy only, and 356 group plus individual therapy myocardial infarction (MI) patients were performed. Depression was diagnosed using modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria; low perceived social support was determined by the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument. Psychosocial treatment followed MI, and for participants with severe or unremitting depression, was supplemented with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate intervention effects on time to first occurrence of the composite end point of death plus nonfatal MI. To control for confounding of group participation with survival (because individual sessions preceded group), we used risk set sampling to match minimal survival time of those receiving or not receiving group training. Results: Analyses correcting for differential survival among comparison groups showed that group plus individual therapy was associated with a 33% reduction (hazard ratio=0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.92, P=.01) in medical outcome compared to usual care. No significant effect on event-free survival was associated with individual therapy alone. The group training benefit was reduced to 23% (hazard ratio=0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.07, P=.11) in the multivariate-adjusted model. Conclusions: Findings suggest that adding group training to individual therapy may be associated with reduction in the composite end point. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to definitively resolve this issue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-56
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Disease-Free Survival
Coronary Disease
Myocardial Infarction
Therapeutics
Social Support
Depression
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Survival
Confidence Intervals
Psychological Adaptation
Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors
Cognitive Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Depression
  • ENRICHD
  • Group self-management training
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Social support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction : The ENRICHD experience. / Saab, Patrice G.; Bang, Heejung; Williams, Redford B.; Powell, Lynda H.; Schneiderman, Neil; Thoresen, Carl; Burg, Matthew; Keefe, Francis.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 67, No. 1, 07.2009, p. 45-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saab, Patrice G. ; Bang, Heejung ; Williams, Redford B. ; Powell, Lynda H. ; Schneiderman, Neil ; Thoresen, Carl ; Burg, Matthew ; Keefe, Francis. / The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction : The ENRICHD experience. In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2009 ; Vol. 67, No. 1. pp. 45-56.
@article{d3fb1cf74ffb49c69b47c2f5fecc0ed7,
title = "The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction: The ENRICHD experience",
abstract = "Objective: Although the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) treatment was designed to include individual therapy and cognitive behavioral group training for patients with depression and/or low perceived social support, only 31{\%} of treated participants received group training. Secondary analyses classified intervention participants into two subgroups, (1) individual therapy only or (2) group training (i.e., coping skills training) plus individual therapy, to determine whether medical outcomes differed in participants who received the combination of group training and individual therapy compared to participants who received individual therapy only or usual care. Methods: Secondary analyses of 1243 usual care, 781 individual therapy only, and 356 group plus individual therapy myocardial infarction (MI) patients were performed. Depression was diagnosed using modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria; low perceived social support was determined by the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument. Psychosocial treatment followed MI, and for participants with severe or unremitting depression, was supplemented with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate intervention effects on time to first occurrence of the composite end point of death plus nonfatal MI. To control for confounding of group participation with survival (because individual sessions preceded group), we used risk set sampling to match minimal survival time of those receiving or not receiving group training. Results: Analyses correcting for differential survival among comparison groups showed that group plus individual therapy was associated with a 33{\%} reduction (hazard ratio=0.67; 95{\%} confidence interval, 0.49-0.92, P=.01) in medical outcome compared to usual care. No significant effect on event-free survival was associated with individual therapy alone. The group training benefit was reduced to 23{\%} (hazard ratio=0.77; 95{\%} confidence interval: 0.56-1.07, P=.11) in the multivariate-adjusted model. Conclusions: Findings suggest that adding group training to individual therapy may be associated with reduction in the composite end point. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to definitively resolve this issue.",
keywords = "Cognitive behavioral therapy, Depression, ENRICHD, Group self-management training, Myocardial infarction, Social support",
author = "Saab, {Patrice G.} and Heejung Bang and Williams, {Redford B.} and Powell, {Lynda H.} and Neil Schneiderman and Carl Thoresen and Matthew Burg and Francis Keefe",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "45--56",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Research",
issn = "0022-3999",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of cognitive behavioral group training on event-free survival in patients with myocardial infarction

T2 - The ENRICHD experience

AU - Saab, Patrice G.

AU - Bang, Heejung

AU - Williams, Redford B.

AU - Powell, Lynda H.

AU - Schneiderman, Neil

AU - Thoresen, Carl

AU - Burg, Matthew

AU - Keefe, Francis

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - Objective: Although the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) treatment was designed to include individual therapy and cognitive behavioral group training for patients with depression and/or low perceived social support, only 31% of treated participants received group training. Secondary analyses classified intervention participants into two subgroups, (1) individual therapy only or (2) group training (i.e., coping skills training) plus individual therapy, to determine whether medical outcomes differed in participants who received the combination of group training and individual therapy compared to participants who received individual therapy only or usual care. Methods: Secondary analyses of 1243 usual care, 781 individual therapy only, and 356 group plus individual therapy myocardial infarction (MI) patients were performed. Depression was diagnosed using modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria; low perceived social support was determined by the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument. Psychosocial treatment followed MI, and for participants with severe or unremitting depression, was supplemented with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate intervention effects on time to first occurrence of the composite end point of death plus nonfatal MI. To control for confounding of group participation with survival (because individual sessions preceded group), we used risk set sampling to match minimal survival time of those receiving or not receiving group training. Results: Analyses correcting for differential survival among comparison groups showed that group plus individual therapy was associated with a 33% reduction (hazard ratio=0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.92, P=.01) in medical outcome compared to usual care. No significant effect on event-free survival was associated with individual therapy alone. The group training benefit was reduced to 23% (hazard ratio=0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.07, P=.11) in the multivariate-adjusted model. Conclusions: Findings suggest that adding group training to individual therapy may be associated with reduction in the composite end point. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to definitively resolve this issue.

AB - Objective: Although the Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD) treatment was designed to include individual therapy and cognitive behavioral group training for patients with depression and/or low perceived social support, only 31% of treated participants received group training. Secondary analyses classified intervention participants into two subgroups, (1) individual therapy only or (2) group training (i.e., coping skills training) plus individual therapy, to determine whether medical outcomes differed in participants who received the combination of group training and individual therapy compared to participants who received individual therapy only or usual care. Methods: Secondary analyses of 1243 usual care, 781 individual therapy only, and 356 group plus individual therapy myocardial infarction (MI) patients were performed. Depression was diagnosed using modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria; low perceived social support was determined by the ENRICHD Social Support Instrument. Psychosocial treatment followed MI, and for participants with severe or unremitting depression, was supplemented with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate intervention effects on time to first occurrence of the composite end point of death plus nonfatal MI. To control for confounding of group participation with survival (because individual sessions preceded group), we used risk set sampling to match minimal survival time of those receiving or not receiving group training. Results: Analyses correcting for differential survival among comparison groups showed that group plus individual therapy was associated with a 33% reduction (hazard ratio=0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.92, P=.01) in medical outcome compared to usual care. No significant effect on event-free survival was associated with individual therapy alone. The group training benefit was reduced to 23% (hazard ratio=0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-1.07, P=.11) in the multivariate-adjusted model. Conclusions: Findings suggest that adding group training to individual therapy may be associated with reduction in the composite end point. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to definitively resolve this issue.

KW - Cognitive behavioral therapy

KW - Depression

KW - ENRICHD

KW - Group self-management training

KW - Myocardial infarction

KW - Social support

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=66949170332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=66949170332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.01.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 19539818

AN - SCOPUS:66949170332

VL - 67

SP - 45

EP - 56

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Research

SN - 0022-3999

IS - 1

ER -