The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images: Results of a phantom study

Jaewon Yang, Tokihiro Yamamoto, Byungchul Cho, Youngho Seo, Paul J. Keall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Irregular breathing causes motion blurring artifacts in 4D PET images. Audiovisual (AV) biofeedback has been demonstrated to improve breathing regularity. To investigate the hypothesis that, compared with free breathing, motion blurring artifacts are reduced with AV biofeedback, the authors performed the first experimental phantom-based quantification of the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality. Methods: The authors acquired 4D PET dynamic phantom images with AV biofeedback and free breathing by moving a phantom programmed with AV biofeedback trained and free breathing respiratory traces of ten healthy subjects. The authors also acquired stationary phantom images for reference. The phantom was cylindrical with six hollow sphere targets (10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm in diameter). The authors quantified motion blurring using the target diameter, Dice coefficient and recovery coefficient (RC) metrics to estimate the effect of motion. Results: The average increase in target diameter for AV biofeedback was 0.6 1.6 mm (4.7 13 %), which was significantly (p 0.001) smaller than for free breathing 1.3 2.2 mm (9.1 19 %). The average Dice coefficient for AV biofeedback was 0.90 0.07, which was significantly (p 0.001) larger than for free breathing (0.88 0.10). The RCs for AV biofeedback were consistently higher than those for free breathing and comparable to those for stationary targets. However, for RCs the impact of target sizes was more dominant than that of motion. In addition, the authors observed large variations in the results with respect to target sizes, subject traces and respiratory bins due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion irregularity. Conclusions: The results indicate that AV biofeedback can significantly reduce motion blurring artifacts and may facilitate improved identification and localization of lung tumors in 4D PET images. The results justify proceeding with clinical studies to quantify the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality and tumor detectability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1046-1057
Number of pages12
JournalMedical Physics
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Respiration
Artifacts
Neoplasms
Healthy Volunteers
Lung

Keywords

  • 4D PET
  • audiovisual biofeedback
  • lung cancer
  • motion blurring artifacts
  • phantom

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images : Results of a phantom study. / Yang, Jaewon; Yamamoto, Tokihiro; Cho, Byungchul; Seo, Youngho; Keall, Paul J.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 1046-1057.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yang, Jaewon ; Yamamoto, Tokihiro ; Cho, Byungchul ; Seo, Youngho ; Keall, Paul J. / The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images : Results of a phantom study. In: Medical Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 2. pp. 1046-1057.
@article{0f558cb6891648c4873ddb922453a25b,
title = "The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images: Results of a phantom study",
abstract = "Purpose: Irregular breathing causes motion blurring artifacts in 4D PET images. Audiovisual (AV) biofeedback has been demonstrated to improve breathing regularity. To investigate the hypothesis that, compared with free breathing, motion blurring artifacts are reduced with AV biofeedback, the authors performed the first experimental phantom-based quantification of the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality. Methods: The authors acquired 4D PET dynamic phantom images with AV biofeedback and free breathing by moving a phantom programmed with AV biofeedback trained and free breathing respiratory traces of ten healthy subjects. The authors also acquired stationary phantom images for reference. The phantom was cylindrical with six hollow sphere targets (10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm in diameter). The authors quantified motion blurring using the target diameter, Dice coefficient and recovery coefficient (RC) metrics to estimate the effect of motion. Results: The average increase in target diameter for AV biofeedback was 0.6 1.6 mm (4.7 13 {\%}), which was significantly (p 0.001) smaller than for free breathing 1.3 2.2 mm (9.1 19 {\%}). The average Dice coefficient for AV biofeedback was 0.90 0.07, which was significantly (p 0.001) larger than for free breathing (0.88 0.10). The RCs for AV biofeedback were consistently higher than those for free breathing and comparable to those for stationary targets. However, for RCs the impact of target sizes was more dominant than that of motion. In addition, the authors observed large variations in the results with respect to target sizes, subject traces and respiratory bins due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion irregularity. Conclusions: The results indicate that AV biofeedback can significantly reduce motion blurring artifacts and may facilitate improved identification and localization of lung tumors in 4D PET images. The results justify proceeding with clinical studies to quantify the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality and tumor detectability.",
keywords = "4D PET, audiovisual biofeedback, lung cancer, motion blurring artifacts, phantom",
author = "Jaewon Yang and Tokihiro Yamamoto and Byungchul Cho and Youngho Seo and Keall, {Paul J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1118/1.3679012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1046--1057",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of audio-visual biofeedback on 4D PET images

T2 - Results of a phantom study

AU - Yang, Jaewon

AU - Yamamoto, Tokihiro

AU - Cho, Byungchul

AU - Seo, Youngho

AU - Keall, Paul J.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Purpose: Irregular breathing causes motion blurring artifacts in 4D PET images. Audiovisual (AV) biofeedback has been demonstrated to improve breathing regularity. To investigate the hypothesis that, compared with free breathing, motion blurring artifacts are reduced with AV biofeedback, the authors performed the first experimental phantom-based quantification of the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality. Methods: The authors acquired 4D PET dynamic phantom images with AV biofeedback and free breathing by moving a phantom programmed with AV biofeedback trained and free breathing respiratory traces of ten healthy subjects. The authors also acquired stationary phantom images for reference. The phantom was cylindrical with six hollow sphere targets (10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm in diameter). The authors quantified motion blurring using the target diameter, Dice coefficient and recovery coefficient (RC) metrics to estimate the effect of motion. Results: The average increase in target diameter for AV biofeedback was 0.6 1.6 mm (4.7 13 %), which was significantly (p 0.001) smaller than for free breathing 1.3 2.2 mm (9.1 19 %). The average Dice coefficient for AV biofeedback was 0.90 0.07, which was significantly (p 0.001) larger than for free breathing (0.88 0.10). The RCs for AV biofeedback were consistently higher than those for free breathing and comparable to those for stationary targets. However, for RCs the impact of target sizes was more dominant than that of motion. In addition, the authors observed large variations in the results with respect to target sizes, subject traces and respiratory bins due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion irregularity. Conclusions: The results indicate that AV biofeedback can significantly reduce motion blurring artifacts and may facilitate improved identification and localization of lung tumors in 4D PET images. The results justify proceeding with clinical studies to quantify the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality and tumor detectability.

AB - Purpose: Irregular breathing causes motion blurring artifacts in 4D PET images. Audiovisual (AV) biofeedback has been demonstrated to improve breathing regularity. To investigate the hypothesis that, compared with free breathing, motion blurring artifacts are reduced with AV biofeedback, the authors performed the first experimental phantom-based quantification of the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality. Methods: The authors acquired 4D PET dynamic phantom images with AV biofeedback and free breathing by moving a phantom programmed with AV biofeedback trained and free breathing respiratory traces of ten healthy subjects. The authors also acquired stationary phantom images for reference. The phantom was cylindrical with six hollow sphere targets (10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm in diameter). The authors quantified motion blurring using the target diameter, Dice coefficient and recovery coefficient (RC) metrics to estimate the effect of motion. Results: The average increase in target diameter for AV biofeedback was 0.6 1.6 mm (4.7 13 %), which was significantly (p 0.001) smaller than for free breathing 1.3 2.2 mm (9.1 19 %). The average Dice coefficient for AV biofeedback was 0.90 0.07, which was significantly (p 0.001) larger than for free breathing (0.88 0.10). The RCs for AV biofeedback were consistently higher than those for free breathing and comparable to those for stationary targets. However, for RCs the impact of target sizes was more dominant than that of motion. In addition, the authors observed large variations in the results with respect to target sizes, subject traces and respiratory bins due to partial volume effects and respiratory motion irregularity. Conclusions: The results indicate that AV biofeedback can significantly reduce motion blurring artifacts and may facilitate improved identification and localization of lung tumors in 4D PET images. The results justify proceeding with clinical studies to quantify the impact of AV biofeedback on 4D PET image quality and tumor detectability.

KW - 4D PET

KW - audiovisual biofeedback

KW - lung cancer

KW - motion blurring artifacts

KW - phantom

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863020711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863020711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3679012

DO - 10.1118/1.3679012

M3 - Article

C2 - 22320815

AN - SCOPUS:84863020711

VL - 39

SP - 1046

EP - 1057

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 2

ER -