The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone

Christopher P Evans, M. L. Stoller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ureteral perforation with resultant retroperitoneal stone expulsion is a recognized complication of ureteroscopy. In a 5-year retrospective review of 400 cases we identified a 1.3% incidence of iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone dislodgment. Average followup was 21 months. Four cases were managed with observation and 1 required surgical correction of a ureteropelvic junction stricture. We discuss the management of this problem, which begins with thorough radiographic documentation in the perioperative period. Aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation and attempted stone retrieval are not warranted, and a ureteral stent should be placed. Radiographic followup and clinical observation confirm the low morbidity associated with retroperitoneal urinary stones. Patient understanding of the extraureteral stone location is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement by uninformed physicians in the future.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)827-829
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume150
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Observation
Ureteroscopy
Urinary Calculi
Perioperative Period
Diagnostic Errors
Documentation
Stents
Pathologic Constriction
Morbidity
Physicians
Incidence

Keywords

  • retroperitoneal space
  • ureteral calculi
  • urinary calculi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone. / Evans, Christopher P; Stoller, M. L.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 150, No. 3, 1993, p. 827-829.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, CP & Stoller, ML 1993, 'The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone', Journal of Urology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 827-829.
Evans, Christopher P ; Stoller, M. L. / The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone. In: Journal of Urology. 1993 ; Vol. 150, No. 3. pp. 827-829.
@article{e8b276719a914447abb97fdd9afbb8f5,
title = "The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone",
abstract = "Ureteral perforation with resultant retroperitoneal stone expulsion is a recognized complication of ureteroscopy. In a 5-year retrospective review of 400 cases we identified a 1.3{\%} incidence of iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone dislodgment. Average followup was 21 months. Four cases were managed with observation and 1 required surgical correction of a ureteropelvic junction stricture. We discuss the management of this problem, which begins with thorough radiographic documentation in the perioperative period. Aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation and attempted stone retrieval are not warranted, and a ureteral stent should be placed. Radiographic followup and clinical observation confirm the low morbidity associated with retroperitoneal urinary stones. Patient understanding of the extraureteral stone location is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement by uninformed physicians in the future.",
keywords = "retroperitoneal space, ureteral calculi, urinary calculi",
author = "Evans, {Christopher P} and Stoller, {M. L.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "827--829",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The fate of the iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone

AU - Evans, Christopher P

AU - Stoller, M. L.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Ureteral perforation with resultant retroperitoneal stone expulsion is a recognized complication of ureteroscopy. In a 5-year retrospective review of 400 cases we identified a 1.3% incidence of iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone dislodgment. Average followup was 21 months. Four cases were managed with observation and 1 required surgical correction of a ureteropelvic junction stricture. We discuss the management of this problem, which begins with thorough radiographic documentation in the perioperative period. Aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation and attempted stone retrieval are not warranted, and a ureteral stent should be placed. Radiographic followup and clinical observation confirm the low morbidity associated with retroperitoneal urinary stones. Patient understanding of the extraureteral stone location is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement by uninformed physicians in the future.

AB - Ureteral perforation with resultant retroperitoneal stone expulsion is a recognized complication of ureteroscopy. In a 5-year retrospective review of 400 cases we identified a 1.3% incidence of iatrogenic retroperitoneal stone dislodgment. Average followup was 21 months. Four cases were managed with observation and 1 required surgical correction of a ureteropelvic junction stricture. We discuss the management of this problem, which begins with thorough radiographic documentation in the perioperative period. Aggressive ureteroscopic manipulation and attempted stone retrieval are not warranted, and a ureteral stent should be placed. Radiographic followup and clinical observation confirm the low morbidity associated with retroperitoneal urinary stones. Patient understanding of the extraureteral stone location is essential to avoid misdiagnosis and mismanagement by uninformed physicians in the future.

KW - retroperitoneal space

KW - ureteral calculi

KW - urinary calculi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027249583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027249583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8345593

AN - SCOPUS:0027249583

VL - 150

SP - 827

EP - 829

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 3

ER -