The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory

A randomized controlled trial

Erin Freed, Debra Long, Tonantzin Rodriguez, Peter Franks, Richard L Kravitz, Anthony F Jerant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory, a key aspect of comprehension. Methods: Randomized controlled trial (N = 60), comparing the effects of experimental and control colorectal cancer (CRC) screening texts on recognition memory, measured using a statement recognition test, accounting for response bias (score range -0.91 to 5.34). The experimental text had a lower Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level (7.4 versus 9.6), was more focused on addressing screening barriers, and employed more comparative tables than the control text. Results: Recognition memory was higher in the experimental group (2.54 versus 1.09, t = -3.63, P = 0.001), including after adjustment for age, education, and health literacy (β = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.68, P = 0.001), and in analyses limited to persons with college degrees (β = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.86, P = 0.004) or no self-reported health literacy problems (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.71, P = 0.02). Conclusion: An experimental CRC screening text improved recognition memory, including among patients with high education and self-assessed health literacy. Practice implications: CRC screening texts comparable to our experimental text may be warranted for all screening-eligible patients, if such texts improve screening uptake.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-265
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume92
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Early Detection of Cancer
Health
Colorectal Neoplasms
Education
Reading
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Colorectal neoplasms
  • Early detection of cancer
  • Educational status
  • Health literacy
  • Mass screening
  • Mental recall
  • Patient education as topic
  • Patient education handout
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory : A randomized controlled trial. / Freed, Erin; Long, Debra; Rodriguez, Tonantzin; Franks, Peter; Kravitz, Richard L; Jerant, Anthony F.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 92, No. 2, 08.2013, p. 260-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e4007bfb1fe44c848b14da81f123b58f,
title = "The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory: A randomized controlled trial",
abstract = "Objective: To compare the effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory, a key aspect of comprehension. Methods: Randomized controlled trial (N = 60), comparing the effects of experimental and control colorectal cancer (CRC) screening texts on recognition memory, measured using a statement recognition test, accounting for response bias (score range -0.91 to 5.34). The experimental text had a lower Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level (7.4 versus 9.6), was more focused on addressing screening barriers, and employed more comparative tables than the control text. Results: Recognition memory was higher in the experimental group (2.54 versus 1.09, t = -3.63, P = 0.001), including after adjustment for age, education, and health literacy (β = 0.42, 95{\%} CI: 0.17, 0.68, P = 0.001), and in analyses limited to persons with college degrees (β = 0.52, 95{\%} CI: 0.18, 0.86, P = 0.004) or no self-reported health literacy problems (β = 0.39, 95{\%} CI: 0.07, 0.71, P = 0.02). Conclusion: An experimental CRC screening text improved recognition memory, including among patients with high education and self-assessed health literacy. Practice implications: CRC screening texts comparable to our experimental text may be warranted for all screening-eligible patients, if such texts improve screening uptake.",
keywords = "Colorectal neoplasms, Early detection of cancer, Educational status, Health literacy, Mass screening, Mental recall, Patient education as topic, Patient education handout, Randomized controlled trial, Reading",
author = "Erin Freed and Debra Long and Tonantzin Rodriguez and Peter Franks and Kravitz, {Richard L} and Jerant, {Anthony F}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "260--265",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory

T2 - A randomized controlled trial

AU - Freed, Erin

AU - Long, Debra

AU - Rodriguez, Tonantzin

AU - Franks, Peter

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Jerant, Anthony F

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Objective: To compare the effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory, a key aspect of comprehension. Methods: Randomized controlled trial (N = 60), comparing the effects of experimental and control colorectal cancer (CRC) screening texts on recognition memory, measured using a statement recognition test, accounting for response bias (score range -0.91 to 5.34). The experimental text had a lower Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level (7.4 versus 9.6), was more focused on addressing screening barriers, and employed more comparative tables than the control text. Results: Recognition memory was higher in the experimental group (2.54 versus 1.09, t = -3.63, P = 0.001), including after adjustment for age, education, and health literacy (β = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.68, P = 0.001), and in analyses limited to persons with college degrees (β = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.86, P = 0.004) or no self-reported health literacy problems (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.71, P = 0.02). Conclusion: An experimental CRC screening text improved recognition memory, including among patients with high education and self-assessed health literacy. Practice implications: CRC screening texts comparable to our experimental text may be warranted for all screening-eligible patients, if such texts improve screening uptake.

AB - Objective: To compare the effects of two health information texts on patient recognition memory, a key aspect of comprehension. Methods: Randomized controlled trial (N = 60), comparing the effects of experimental and control colorectal cancer (CRC) screening texts on recognition memory, measured using a statement recognition test, accounting for response bias (score range -0.91 to 5.34). The experimental text had a lower Flesch-Kincaid reading grade level (7.4 versus 9.6), was more focused on addressing screening barriers, and employed more comparative tables than the control text. Results: Recognition memory was higher in the experimental group (2.54 versus 1.09, t = -3.63, P = 0.001), including after adjustment for age, education, and health literacy (β = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.68, P = 0.001), and in analyses limited to persons with college degrees (β = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.86, P = 0.004) or no self-reported health literacy problems (β = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.07, 0.71, P = 0.02). Conclusion: An experimental CRC screening text improved recognition memory, including among patients with high education and self-assessed health literacy. Practice implications: CRC screening texts comparable to our experimental text may be warranted for all screening-eligible patients, if such texts improve screening uptake.

KW - Colorectal neoplasms

KW - Early detection of cancer

KW - Educational status

KW - Health literacy

KW - Mass screening

KW - Mental recall

KW - Patient education as topic

KW - Patient education handout

KW - Randomized controlled trial

KW - Reading

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880326064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880326064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.008

M3 - Article

VL - 92

SP - 260

EP - 265

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 2

ER -