The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients

Miriam A Nuno, Chirag G. Patil, Patrick Lyden, Doniel Drazin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Prompt management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is critical. Literature is inconclusive regarding outcomes for patients directly admitted to specialized centers versus transferred from lower-volume hospitals. Providers are often unclear about the safety of transferring critical patients. This study evaluated the "transfer effect" in a large sample of aneurysmal SAH patients undergoing treatment. Methods: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002-2007 data, we analyzed outcomes of SAH patients treated with coil or clip procedures. Analyses studied the effect of direct-admit versus transfer admission on mortality, discharge disposition, complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Results: Of 47,114 patients, 31,711 (67.3 %) were direct-admits and 15,403 (32.7 %) were transfers. More transfer patients were coiled than direct-admits (45.3 vs. 33.7 %, p < 0.0001) and fewer underwent ventriculostomy (26.6 vs. 31.5 %, p = 0.003). Older age (OR 1.2, p < 0.0001), higher disease severity (OR 1.4, p < 0.0001), lower volume (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001), and ventriculostomy (OR 2.1, p < 0.0001) increased mortality and predicted non-routine discharge, complications, LOS, and charges. Transfer patients had similar mortality (OR 0.9, p = 0.13) and complications (OR 0.9, p = 0.22) as direct-admits, but incurred higher non-routine discharge (OR 1.3, p = 0.002). Analysis of grade V patients demonstrated similar outcomes between direct-admits and transfers; however, charges for treating transfer patients were notably higher (401,386 vs. 242,774, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients treated in the lowest volume hospitals were 1.6 times more likely to die than those treated at the highest quintile hospitals. Among the critically ill grade V patients, transfer to higher-volume specialized centers did not increase the likelihood of a poor prognosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-323
Number of pages12
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Patient Transfer
Ventriculostomy
Mortality
Length of Stay
Low-Volume Hospitals
Surgical Instruments
Critical Illness
Inpatients
Safety

Keywords

  • Clip
  • Coil
  • Complications
  • Hospital volume
  • Mortality
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Total charges
  • Transfer-effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. / Nuno, Miriam A; Patil, Chirag G.; Lyden, Patrick; Drazin, Doniel.

In: Neurocritical Care, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.12.2012, p. 312-323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nuno, Miriam A ; Patil, Chirag G. ; Lyden, Patrick ; Drazin, Doniel. / The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. In: Neurocritical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 312-323.
@article{10341d3cc01446398715dd81e8e0092c,
title = "The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients",
abstract = "Introduction: Prompt management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is critical. Literature is inconclusive regarding outcomes for patients directly admitted to specialized centers versus transferred from lower-volume hospitals. Providers are often unclear about the safety of transferring critical patients. This study evaluated the {"}transfer effect{"} in a large sample of aneurysmal SAH patients undergoing treatment. Methods: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002-2007 data, we analyzed outcomes of SAH patients treated with coil or clip procedures. Analyses studied the effect of direct-admit versus transfer admission on mortality, discharge disposition, complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Results: Of 47,114 patients, 31,711 (67.3 {\%}) were direct-admits and 15,403 (32.7 {\%}) were transfers. More transfer patients were coiled than direct-admits (45.3 vs. 33.7 {\%}, p < 0.0001) and fewer underwent ventriculostomy (26.6 vs. 31.5 {\%}, p = 0.003). Older age (OR 1.2, p < 0.0001), higher disease severity (OR 1.4, p < 0.0001), lower volume (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001), and ventriculostomy (OR 2.1, p < 0.0001) increased mortality and predicted non-routine discharge, complications, LOS, and charges. Transfer patients had similar mortality (OR 0.9, p = 0.13) and complications (OR 0.9, p = 0.22) as direct-admits, but incurred higher non-routine discharge (OR 1.3, p = 0.002). Analysis of grade V patients demonstrated similar outcomes between direct-admits and transfers; however, charges for treating transfer patients were notably higher (401,386 vs. 242,774, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients treated in the lowest volume hospitals were 1.6 times more likely to die than those treated at the highest quintile hospitals. Among the critically ill grade V patients, transfer to higher-volume specialized centers did not increase the likelihood of a poor prognosis.",
keywords = "Clip, Coil, Complications, Hospital volume, Mortality, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Total charges, Transfer-effect",
author = "Nuno, {Miriam A} and Patil, {Chirag G.} and Patrick Lyden and Doniel Drazin",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12028-012-9740-y",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "312--323",
journal = "Neurocritical Care",
issn = "1541-6933",
publisher = "Humana Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of transfer and hospital volume in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients

AU - Nuno, Miriam A

AU - Patil, Chirag G.

AU - Lyden, Patrick

AU - Drazin, Doniel

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Introduction: Prompt management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is critical. Literature is inconclusive regarding outcomes for patients directly admitted to specialized centers versus transferred from lower-volume hospitals. Providers are often unclear about the safety of transferring critical patients. This study evaluated the "transfer effect" in a large sample of aneurysmal SAH patients undergoing treatment. Methods: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002-2007 data, we analyzed outcomes of SAH patients treated with coil or clip procedures. Analyses studied the effect of direct-admit versus transfer admission on mortality, discharge disposition, complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Results: Of 47,114 patients, 31,711 (67.3 %) were direct-admits and 15,403 (32.7 %) were transfers. More transfer patients were coiled than direct-admits (45.3 vs. 33.7 %, p < 0.0001) and fewer underwent ventriculostomy (26.6 vs. 31.5 %, p = 0.003). Older age (OR 1.2, p < 0.0001), higher disease severity (OR 1.4, p < 0.0001), lower volume (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001), and ventriculostomy (OR 2.1, p < 0.0001) increased mortality and predicted non-routine discharge, complications, LOS, and charges. Transfer patients had similar mortality (OR 0.9, p = 0.13) and complications (OR 0.9, p = 0.22) as direct-admits, but incurred higher non-routine discharge (OR 1.3, p = 0.002). Analysis of grade V patients demonstrated similar outcomes between direct-admits and transfers; however, charges for treating transfer patients were notably higher (401,386 vs. 242,774, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients treated in the lowest volume hospitals were 1.6 times more likely to die than those treated at the highest quintile hospitals. Among the critically ill grade V patients, transfer to higher-volume specialized centers did not increase the likelihood of a poor prognosis.

AB - Introduction: Prompt management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is critical. Literature is inconclusive regarding outcomes for patients directly admitted to specialized centers versus transferred from lower-volume hospitals. Providers are often unclear about the safety of transferring critical patients. This study evaluated the "transfer effect" in a large sample of aneurysmal SAH patients undergoing treatment. Methods: Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2002-2007 data, we analyzed outcomes of SAH patients treated with coil or clip procedures. Analyses studied the effect of direct-admit versus transfer admission on mortality, discharge disposition, complications, length of stay (LOS), and total charges. Results: Of 47,114 patients, 31,711 (67.3 %) were direct-admits and 15,403 (32.7 %) were transfers. More transfer patients were coiled than direct-admits (45.3 vs. 33.7 %, p < 0.0001) and fewer underwent ventriculostomy (26.6 vs. 31.5 %, p = 0.003). Older age (OR 1.2, p < 0.0001), higher disease severity (OR 1.4, p < 0.0001), lower volume (OR 1.5, p < 0.0001), and ventriculostomy (OR 2.1, p < 0.0001) increased mortality and predicted non-routine discharge, complications, LOS, and charges. Transfer patients had similar mortality (OR 0.9, p = 0.13) and complications (OR 0.9, p = 0.22) as direct-admits, but incurred higher non-routine discharge (OR 1.3, p = 0.002). Analysis of grade V patients demonstrated similar outcomes between direct-admits and transfers; however, charges for treating transfer patients were notably higher (401,386 vs. 242,774, p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients treated in the lowest volume hospitals were 1.6 times more likely to die than those treated at the highest quintile hospitals. Among the critically ill grade V patients, transfer to higher-volume specialized centers did not increase the likelihood of a poor prognosis.

KW - Clip

KW - Coil

KW - Complications

KW - Hospital volume

KW - Mortality

KW - Subarachnoid hemorrhage

KW - Total charges

KW - Transfer-effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874585597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874585597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12028-012-9740-y

DO - 10.1007/s12028-012-9740-y

M3 - Article

C2 - 22843190

AN - SCOPUS:84874585597

VL - 17

SP - 312

EP - 323

JO - Neurocritical Care

JF - Neurocritical Care

SN - 1541-6933

IS - 3

ER -