The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone

Do Gyoon Kim, Gregory T. Christopherson, X. Neil Dong, David P Fyhrie, Yener N. Yeni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stereological parameters have been used as an approximation for the architecture of trabecular bone. Structural indices such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), bone surface-to-volume ratio (BS/BV), degree of anisotropy (MIL1/MIL3), and connectivity density (-Euler/Vol) have been widely studied to investigate pathological conditions in bone. Due to its high resolution and nondestructiveness, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been utilized to take precise three-dimensional (3D) images of trabecular microstructures. However, spatial limitations for applying micro-CT-based analyses to large specimens, such as whole vertebral bodies, require using larger scanning and reconstruction voxel sizes. In this study, combinations of three different scanning and reconstruction voxel size were used to represent best possible voxel size (21 μm; best in our scanner for the specimen size used) relative to other voxel sizes used in this study, commonly used intermediate voxel sizes (50 μm), and those applicable to scans of whole human vertebral bodies (110 μm) in order to examine the effect of scanning and reconstruction voxel size on stereological measures for human cancellous bone. The error in stereological parameters calculated using combinations of large voxel sizes compared to the gold standard (best possible case) ranged from 0.1% to 102%. The signed magnitude of the error in other cases relative to the gold standard was a function of either scanning or reconstruction voxel size or both (r2 = 0.55-0.95). For most of the structural indices, the results from analysis of images with larger voxel sizes were correlated with those from the gold standard (r2 = 0.55-0.99) except for Tb.N at 110/110 μm, MIL1/MIL3 at larger than 110 μm reconstruction voxel size, and -Euler/Vol at any combination of voxel sizes. Overall, it was observed that resampling a high resolution image at lower resolutions (corresponding to increasing reconstruction voxel size in this study) had different effects on the calculated parameters than scanning at the same low resolution (corresponding to increasing scanning voxel size in this study). Our results show that investigations of image resolution should include actual scans at the resolution of interest rather than simply coarsening of high-resolution images as is customarily done.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1375-1382
Number of pages8
JournalBone
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

X-Ray Microtomography
Bone and Bones
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Anisotropy
Human Body
Cancellous Bone

Keywords

  • Calibration
  • Micro-CT
  • Resolution
  • Stereology
  • Trabecular bone

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Hematology

Cite this

The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone. / Kim, Do Gyoon; Christopherson, Gregory T.; Dong, X. Neil; Fyhrie, David P; Yeni, Yener N.

In: Bone, Vol. 35, No. 6, 12.2004, p. 1375-1382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, Do Gyoon ; Christopherson, Gregory T. ; Dong, X. Neil ; Fyhrie, David P ; Yeni, Yener N. / The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone. In: Bone. 2004 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 1375-1382.
@article{d17dcb946102408f9c82f37aa6cb8848,
title = "The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone",
abstract = "Stereological parameters have been used as an approximation for the architecture of trabecular bone. Structural indices such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), bone surface-to-volume ratio (BS/BV), degree of anisotropy (MIL1/MIL3), and connectivity density (-Euler/Vol) have been widely studied to investigate pathological conditions in bone. Due to its high resolution and nondestructiveness, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been utilized to take precise three-dimensional (3D) images of trabecular microstructures. However, spatial limitations for applying micro-CT-based analyses to large specimens, such as whole vertebral bodies, require using larger scanning and reconstruction voxel sizes. In this study, combinations of three different scanning and reconstruction voxel size were used to represent best possible voxel size (21 μm; best in our scanner for the specimen size used) relative to other voxel sizes used in this study, commonly used intermediate voxel sizes (50 μm), and those applicable to scans of whole human vertebral bodies (110 μm) in order to examine the effect of scanning and reconstruction voxel size on stereological measures for human cancellous bone. The error in stereological parameters calculated using combinations of large voxel sizes compared to the gold standard (best possible case) ranged from 0.1{\%} to 102{\%}. The signed magnitude of the error in other cases relative to the gold standard was a function of either scanning or reconstruction voxel size or both (r2 = 0.55-0.95). For most of the structural indices, the results from analysis of images with larger voxel sizes were correlated with those from the gold standard (r2 = 0.55-0.99) except for Tb.N at 110/110 μm, MIL1/MIL3 at larger than 110 μm reconstruction voxel size, and -Euler/Vol at any combination of voxel sizes. Overall, it was observed that resampling a high resolution image at lower resolutions (corresponding to increasing reconstruction voxel size in this study) had different effects on the calculated parameters than scanning at the same low resolution (corresponding to increasing scanning voxel size in this study). Our results show that investigations of image resolution should include actual scans at the resolution of interest rather than simply coarsening of high-resolution images as is customarily done.",
keywords = "Calibration, Micro-CT, Resolution, Stereology, Trabecular bone",
author = "Kim, {Do Gyoon} and Christopherson, {Gregory T.} and Dong, {X. Neil} and Fyhrie, {David P} and Yeni, {Yener N.}",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1375--1382",
journal = "Bone",
issn = "8756-3282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone

AU - Kim, Do Gyoon

AU - Christopherson, Gregory T.

AU - Dong, X. Neil

AU - Fyhrie, David P

AU - Yeni, Yener N.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - Stereological parameters have been used as an approximation for the architecture of trabecular bone. Structural indices such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), bone surface-to-volume ratio (BS/BV), degree of anisotropy (MIL1/MIL3), and connectivity density (-Euler/Vol) have been widely studied to investigate pathological conditions in bone. Due to its high resolution and nondestructiveness, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been utilized to take precise three-dimensional (3D) images of trabecular microstructures. However, spatial limitations for applying micro-CT-based analyses to large specimens, such as whole vertebral bodies, require using larger scanning and reconstruction voxel sizes. In this study, combinations of three different scanning and reconstruction voxel size were used to represent best possible voxel size (21 μm; best in our scanner for the specimen size used) relative to other voxel sizes used in this study, commonly used intermediate voxel sizes (50 μm), and those applicable to scans of whole human vertebral bodies (110 μm) in order to examine the effect of scanning and reconstruction voxel size on stereological measures for human cancellous bone. The error in stereological parameters calculated using combinations of large voxel sizes compared to the gold standard (best possible case) ranged from 0.1% to 102%. The signed magnitude of the error in other cases relative to the gold standard was a function of either scanning or reconstruction voxel size or both (r2 = 0.55-0.95). For most of the structural indices, the results from analysis of images with larger voxel sizes were correlated with those from the gold standard (r2 = 0.55-0.99) except for Tb.N at 110/110 μm, MIL1/MIL3 at larger than 110 μm reconstruction voxel size, and -Euler/Vol at any combination of voxel sizes. Overall, it was observed that resampling a high resolution image at lower resolutions (corresponding to increasing reconstruction voxel size in this study) had different effects on the calculated parameters than scanning at the same low resolution (corresponding to increasing scanning voxel size in this study). Our results show that investigations of image resolution should include actual scans at the resolution of interest rather than simply coarsening of high-resolution images as is customarily done.

AB - Stereological parameters have been used as an approximation for the architecture of trabecular bone. Structural indices such as bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), bone surface-to-volume ratio (BS/BV), degree of anisotropy (MIL1/MIL3), and connectivity density (-Euler/Vol) have been widely studied to investigate pathological conditions in bone. Due to its high resolution and nondestructiveness, microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has been utilized to take precise three-dimensional (3D) images of trabecular microstructures. However, spatial limitations for applying micro-CT-based analyses to large specimens, such as whole vertebral bodies, require using larger scanning and reconstruction voxel sizes. In this study, combinations of three different scanning and reconstruction voxel size were used to represent best possible voxel size (21 μm; best in our scanner for the specimen size used) relative to other voxel sizes used in this study, commonly used intermediate voxel sizes (50 μm), and those applicable to scans of whole human vertebral bodies (110 μm) in order to examine the effect of scanning and reconstruction voxel size on stereological measures for human cancellous bone. The error in stereological parameters calculated using combinations of large voxel sizes compared to the gold standard (best possible case) ranged from 0.1% to 102%. The signed magnitude of the error in other cases relative to the gold standard was a function of either scanning or reconstruction voxel size or both (r2 = 0.55-0.95). For most of the structural indices, the results from analysis of images with larger voxel sizes were correlated with those from the gold standard (r2 = 0.55-0.99) except for Tb.N at 110/110 μm, MIL1/MIL3 at larger than 110 μm reconstruction voxel size, and -Euler/Vol at any combination of voxel sizes. Overall, it was observed that resampling a high resolution image at lower resolutions (corresponding to increasing reconstruction voxel size in this study) had different effects on the calculated parameters than scanning at the same low resolution (corresponding to increasing scanning voxel size in this study). Our results show that investigations of image resolution should include actual scans at the resolution of interest rather than simply coarsening of high-resolution images as is customarily done.

KW - Calibration

KW - Micro-CT

KW - Resolution

KW - Stereology

KW - Trabecular bone

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=13844310711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=13844310711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2004.09.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 15589219

AN - SCOPUS:13844310711

VL - 35

SP - 1375

EP - 1382

JO - Bone

JF - Bone

SN - 8756-3282

IS - 6

ER -