The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs

William T Culp, Philipp Mayhew, Dorothy C. Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

147 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To describe a technique for laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in small dogs, and compare the surgical time, complications, and postoperative activity of dogs undergoing LapOVE to those undergoing conventional traditional open ovariectomy (OOVE). Study Design A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Animals Intact small breed (<10 kg) female dogs (n=20). Methods Ventral median celiotomy was performed for OOVE. A 2-midline portal technique using a 3.5 mm laparoscope port and a 6 mm instrument portal was used for LapOVE. An accelerometer was attached to the collar of each dog to record 24-hour preoperative and 48-hour postoperative activity. Total activity counts recorded before surgery were compared with total counts recorded after surgery. The percent change in counts after surgery was compared between OOVE- and LapOVE-treated dogs. Results No major complications occurred and surgical time for LapOVE was significantly longer than for OOVE cases (P=.005). Dogs in the LapOVE group had a 25% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-38%), whereas dogs in the OOVE group had a 62% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% CI: 48-76%). Conclusions Both procedures were performed with reasonable surgical times and without major complication. Postoperative activity, as measured by accelerometry, was significantly different between the 2 groups. Clinical Relevance Laparoscopy is a safe method for ovariectomy in small dogs and results in increased postoperative activity counts when compared with an open technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)811-817
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary Surgery
Volume38
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ovariectomy
Ovariectomy
Dogs
dogs
surgery
Operative Time
confidence interval
accelerometry
Accelerometry
Confidence Intervals
Laparoscopes
methodology
laparoscopy
randomized clinical trials
collars
Laparoscopy
Randomized Controlled Trials
experimental design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs. / Culp, William T; Mayhew, Philipp; Brown, Dorothy C.

In: Veterinary Surgery, Vol. 38, No. 7, 10.2009, p. 811-817.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a67d1374e38d4baba8ba2dad3c6e9fa0,
title = "The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs",
abstract = "Objective To describe a technique for laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in small dogs, and compare the surgical time, complications, and postoperative activity of dogs undergoing LapOVE to those undergoing conventional traditional open ovariectomy (OOVE). Study Design A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Animals Intact small breed (<10 kg) female dogs (n=20). Methods Ventral median celiotomy was performed for OOVE. A 2-midline portal technique using a 3.5 mm laparoscope port and a 6 mm instrument portal was used for LapOVE. An accelerometer was attached to the collar of each dog to record 24-hour preoperative and 48-hour postoperative activity. Total activity counts recorded before surgery were compared with total counts recorded after surgery. The percent change in counts after surgery was compared between OOVE- and LapOVE-treated dogs. Results No major complications occurred and surgical time for LapOVE was significantly longer than for OOVE cases (P=.005). Dogs in the LapOVE group had a 25{\%} decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95{\%} confidence interval [CI]: 11-38{\%}), whereas dogs in the OOVE group had a 62{\%} decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95{\%} CI: 48-76{\%}). Conclusions Both procedures were performed with reasonable surgical times and without major complication. Postoperative activity, as measured by accelerometry, was significantly different between the 2 groups. Clinical Relevance Laparoscopy is a safe method for ovariectomy in small dogs and results in increased postoperative activity counts when compared with an open technique.",
author = "Culp, {William T} and Philipp Mayhew and Brown, {Dorothy C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00572.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "811--817",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of laparoscopic versus open ovariectomy on postsurgical activity in small dogs

AU - Culp, William T

AU - Mayhew, Philipp

AU - Brown, Dorothy C.

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Objective To describe a technique for laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in small dogs, and compare the surgical time, complications, and postoperative activity of dogs undergoing LapOVE to those undergoing conventional traditional open ovariectomy (OOVE). Study Design A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Animals Intact small breed (<10 kg) female dogs (n=20). Methods Ventral median celiotomy was performed for OOVE. A 2-midline portal technique using a 3.5 mm laparoscope port and a 6 mm instrument portal was used for LapOVE. An accelerometer was attached to the collar of each dog to record 24-hour preoperative and 48-hour postoperative activity. Total activity counts recorded before surgery were compared with total counts recorded after surgery. The percent change in counts after surgery was compared between OOVE- and LapOVE-treated dogs. Results No major complications occurred and surgical time for LapOVE was significantly longer than for OOVE cases (P=.005). Dogs in the LapOVE group had a 25% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-38%), whereas dogs in the OOVE group had a 62% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% CI: 48-76%). Conclusions Both procedures were performed with reasonable surgical times and without major complication. Postoperative activity, as measured by accelerometry, was significantly different between the 2 groups. Clinical Relevance Laparoscopy is a safe method for ovariectomy in small dogs and results in increased postoperative activity counts when compared with an open technique.

AB - Objective To describe a technique for laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) in small dogs, and compare the surgical time, complications, and postoperative activity of dogs undergoing LapOVE to those undergoing conventional traditional open ovariectomy (OOVE). Study Design A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Animals Intact small breed (<10 kg) female dogs (n=20). Methods Ventral median celiotomy was performed for OOVE. A 2-midline portal technique using a 3.5 mm laparoscope port and a 6 mm instrument portal was used for LapOVE. An accelerometer was attached to the collar of each dog to record 24-hour preoperative and 48-hour postoperative activity. Total activity counts recorded before surgery were compared with total counts recorded after surgery. The percent change in counts after surgery was compared between OOVE- and LapOVE-treated dogs. Results No major complications occurred and surgical time for LapOVE was significantly longer than for OOVE cases (P=.005). Dogs in the LapOVE group had a 25% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11-38%), whereas dogs in the OOVE group had a 62% decrease in total activity counts after surgery (95% CI: 48-76%). Conclusions Both procedures were performed with reasonable surgical times and without major complication. Postoperative activity, as measured by accelerometry, was significantly different between the 2 groups. Clinical Relevance Laparoscopy is a safe method for ovariectomy in small dogs and results in increased postoperative activity counts when compared with an open technique.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349547219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349547219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00572.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2009.00572.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 19781023

AN - SCOPUS:70349547219

VL - 38

SP - 811

EP - 817

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

IS - 7

ER -