The door-in-the-face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context

Robert A Bell, Matthew F. Abrahams, Catherine L. Clark, Christina Schlatter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the reciprocal concessions and self-presentation accounts of the door-in-the-face (DITF) compliance strategy within a fundraising context. Subjects were classified as low or high in exchange orientation, and as low or high in approval motivation on the basis of a pretest questionnaire. As predicted on the basis of reciprocal concessions theory, a significant interaction was obtained between exchange-orientation and message strategy. For high exchange-oriented subjects, the DITF message strategy substantially increased compliance rates, relative to the single-request control message. However, low exchange-oriented subjects were actually more charitable in response to the control message. Analysis of a post-treatment measure of obligation to the requestor revealed that obligation could account for less than half of the interaction effect, a finding which is inconsistent with concessions theory. Self-presentation theory suggests that DITF should work best when directed toward targets who are high in their approval motivation, but this hypothesized interaction between approval motivation and message strategy did not materialize.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)107-124
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Phytoremediation
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

fund raising
acquired immune deficiency syndrome
compliance
questionnaires
approval
analysis
concession
Compliance

Keywords

  • AIDS
  • Compliance
  • Door-in-the-face
  • Fundraising

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Pollution
  • Plant Science

Cite this

The door-in-the-face compliance strategy : An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context. / Bell, Robert A; Abrahams, Matthew F.; Clark, Catherine L.; Schlatter, Christina.

In: International Journal of Phytoremediation, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 107-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bell, Robert A ; Abrahams, Matthew F. ; Clark, Catherine L. ; Schlatter, Christina. / The door-in-the-face compliance strategy : An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context. In: International Journal of Phytoremediation. 1996 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 107-124.
@article{7cc125669e914cc189351eb66b1f5ca6,
title = "The door-in-the-face compliance strategy: An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context",
abstract = "This study examined the reciprocal concessions and self-presentation accounts of the door-in-the-face (DITF) compliance strategy within a fundraising context. Subjects were classified as low or high in exchange orientation, and as low or high in approval motivation on the basis of a pretest questionnaire. As predicted on the basis of reciprocal concessions theory, a significant interaction was obtained between exchange-orientation and message strategy. For high exchange-oriented subjects, the DITF message strategy substantially increased compliance rates, relative to the single-request control message. However, low exchange-oriented subjects were actually more charitable in response to the control message. Analysis of a post-treatment measure of obligation to the requestor revealed that obligation could account for less than half of the interaction effect, a finding which is inconsistent with concessions theory. Self-presentation theory suggests that DITF should work best when directed toward targets who are high in their approval motivation, but this hypothesized interaction between approval motivation and message strategy did not materialize.",
keywords = "AIDS, Compliance, Door-in-the-face, Fundraising",
author = "Bell, {Robert A} and Abrahams, {Matthew F.} and Clark, {Catherine L.} and Christina Schlatter",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463379609370003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "107--124",
journal = "International Journal of Phytoremediation",
issn = "1522-6514",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The door-in-the-face compliance strategy

T2 - An individual differences analysis of two models in an AIDS fundraising context

AU - Bell, Robert A

AU - Abrahams, Matthew F.

AU - Clark, Catherine L.

AU - Schlatter, Christina

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - This study examined the reciprocal concessions and self-presentation accounts of the door-in-the-face (DITF) compliance strategy within a fundraising context. Subjects were classified as low or high in exchange orientation, and as low or high in approval motivation on the basis of a pretest questionnaire. As predicted on the basis of reciprocal concessions theory, a significant interaction was obtained between exchange-orientation and message strategy. For high exchange-oriented subjects, the DITF message strategy substantially increased compliance rates, relative to the single-request control message. However, low exchange-oriented subjects were actually more charitable in response to the control message. Analysis of a post-treatment measure of obligation to the requestor revealed that obligation could account for less than half of the interaction effect, a finding which is inconsistent with concessions theory. Self-presentation theory suggests that DITF should work best when directed toward targets who are high in their approval motivation, but this hypothesized interaction between approval motivation and message strategy did not materialize.

AB - This study examined the reciprocal concessions and self-presentation accounts of the door-in-the-face (DITF) compliance strategy within a fundraising context. Subjects were classified as low or high in exchange orientation, and as low or high in approval motivation on the basis of a pretest questionnaire. As predicted on the basis of reciprocal concessions theory, a significant interaction was obtained between exchange-orientation and message strategy. For high exchange-oriented subjects, the DITF message strategy substantially increased compliance rates, relative to the single-request control message. However, low exchange-oriented subjects were actually more charitable in response to the control message. Analysis of a post-treatment measure of obligation to the requestor revealed that obligation could account for less than half of the interaction effect, a finding which is inconsistent with concessions theory. Self-presentation theory suggests that DITF should work best when directed toward targets who are high in their approval motivation, but this hypothesized interaction between approval motivation and message strategy did not materialize.

KW - AIDS

KW - Compliance

KW - Door-in-the-face

KW - Fundraising

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064782032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064782032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463379609370003

DO - 10.1080/01463379609370003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064782032

VL - 44

SP - 107

EP - 124

JO - International Journal of Phytoremediation

JF - International Journal of Phytoremediation

SN - 1522-6514

IS - 1

ER -