The dogmas of nutrition and cancer: Time for a second (and maybe third) look

Ralph W deVere White; Robert M. Hackman; Joel Kugelmass

doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x

The dogmas of nutrition and cancer: Time for a second (and maybe third) look

Ralph W deVere White, Robert M. Hackman, Joel Kugelmass

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In many peer-reviewed articles, the assertion that 30-40% of cancers can be prevented with a healthy lifestyle and appropriate dietary measures has become axiomatic. The information often is derived from an expert panel's opinion as opposed to hypothesis-driven research. Unquestionably, the single most effective and validated cancer prevention measure is to not smoke, or if one does, to cease. However, obesity avoidance reduces the risk of heart disease and diabetes and probably some cancers. While for some Americans the consumption of an unhealthy diet is by choice, for many it is driven by financial constraints and the search for calories of any kind. Regrettably, beyond that, there is little compelling evidence on how diet can be used to prevent cancer.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Pages	118-125
Number of pages	8
Volume	1190
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x
State	Published - Mar 2010

Publication series

Name	Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume	1190
ISSN (Print)	00778923
ISSN (Electronic)	17496632

Keywords

Cancer prevention
Dietary guidelines
Food access
Healthy living
Nutrition
Smoking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Access to Document

10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The dogmas of nutrition and cancer: Time for a second (and maybe third) look'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

deVere White, R. W., Hackman, R. M., & Kugelmass, J. (2010). The dogmas of nutrition and cancer: Time for a second (and maybe third) look. In Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Vol. 1190, pp. 118-125). (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Vol. 1190). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x

@inproceedings{59c68fd9f63a421483347af2ab666509,

title = "The dogmas of nutrition and cancer: Time for a second (and maybe third) look",

abstract = "In many peer-reviewed articles, the assertion that 30-40% of cancers can be prevented with a healthy lifestyle and appropriate dietary measures has become axiomatic. The information often is derived from an expert panel's opinion as opposed to hypothesis-driven research. Unquestionably, the single most effective and validated cancer prevention measure is to not smoke, or if one does, to cease. However, obesity avoidance reduces the risk of heart disease and diabetes and probably some cancers. While for some Americans the consumption of an unhealthy diet is by choice, for many it is driven by financial constraints and the search for calories of any kind. Regrettably, beyond that, there is little compelling evidence on how diet can be used to prevent cancer.",

keywords = "Cancer prevention, Dietary guidelines, Food access, Healthy living, Nutrition, Smoking",

author = "{deVere White}, {Ralph W} and Hackman, {Robert M.} and Joel Kugelmass",

year = "2010",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781573317900",

volume = "1190",

series = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",

pages = "118--125",

booktitle = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - The dogmas of nutrition and cancer

T2 - Time for a second (and maybe third) look

AU - deVere White, Ralph W

AU - Hackman, Robert M.

AU - Kugelmass, Joel

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - In many peer-reviewed articles, the assertion that 30-40% of cancers can be prevented with a healthy lifestyle and appropriate dietary measures has become axiomatic. The information often is derived from an expert panel's opinion as opposed to hypothesis-driven research. Unquestionably, the single most effective and validated cancer prevention measure is to not smoke, or if one does, to cease. However, obesity avoidance reduces the risk of heart disease and diabetes and probably some cancers. While for some Americans the consumption of an unhealthy diet is by choice, for many it is driven by financial constraints and the search for calories of any kind. Regrettably, beyond that, there is little compelling evidence on how diet can be used to prevent cancer.

AB - In many peer-reviewed articles, the assertion that 30-40% of cancers can be prevented with a healthy lifestyle and appropriate dietary measures has become axiomatic. The information often is derived from an expert panel's opinion as opposed to hypothesis-driven research. Unquestionably, the single most effective and validated cancer prevention measure is to not smoke, or if one does, to cease. However, obesity avoidance reduces the risk of heart disease and diabetes and probably some cancers. While for some Americans the consumption of an unhealthy diet is by choice, for many it is driven by financial constraints and the search for calories of any kind. Regrettably, beyond that, there is little compelling evidence on how diet can be used to prevent cancer.

KW - Cancer prevention

KW - Dietary guidelines

KW - Food access

KW - Healthy living

KW - Nutrition

KW - Smoking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950196371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950196371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05271.x

M3 - Conference contribution

C2 - 20388142

AN - SCOPUS:77950196371

SN - 9781573317900

VL - 1190

T3 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SP - 118

EP - 125

BT - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

ER -