The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals

R. A. Rosenblatt, G. R. Saunders, C. J. Tressler, E. H. Larson, T. S. Nesbitt, Thomas S Nesbitt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We determined the distribution and sophistication of obstetric technologies in all 80 maternity hospitals in the state of Washington and examined the effect of rural or urban location, birth volume, and physician staffing on technological intensity. Although smaller and more rural hospitals refer most premature and low-birth weight infants to regional referral centers, sophisticated prenatal and intrapartum technologies are available in the majority of even the smallest and most remote rural units. Rural hospitals have slightly lower obstetrical intervention rates than do their urban counterparts, but the differences are not great.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)479-489
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume10
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Rural Hospitals
Obstetrics
Technology
Maternity Hospitals
Premature Birth
Low Birth Weight Infant
Referral and Consultation
Parturition
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Health Informatics
  • Nursing(all)
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Rosenblatt, R. A., Saunders, G. R., Tressler, C. J., Larson, E. H., Nesbitt, T. S., & Nesbitt, T. S. (1994). The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 10(3), 479-489.

The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals. / Rosenblatt, R. A.; Saunders, G. R.; Tressler, C. J.; Larson, E. H.; Nesbitt, T. S.; Nesbitt, Thomas S.

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 10, No. 3, 1994, p. 479-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rosenblatt, RA, Saunders, GR, Tressler, CJ, Larson, EH, Nesbitt, TS & Nesbitt, TS 1994, 'The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals', International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 479-489.
Rosenblatt, R. A. ; Saunders, G. R. ; Tressler, C. J. ; Larson, E. H. ; Nesbitt, T. S. ; Nesbitt, Thomas S. / The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals. In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1994 ; Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 479-489.
@article{416ba11b07d34d69926e713274f6385f,
title = "The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals",
abstract = "We determined the distribution and sophistication of obstetric technologies in all 80 maternity hospitals in the state of Washington and examined the effect of rural or urban location, birth volume, and physician staffing on technological intensity. Although smaller and more rural hospitals refer most premature and low-birth weight infants to regional referral centers, sophisticated prenatal and intrapartum technologies are available in the majority of even the smallest and most remote rural units. Rural hospitals have slightly lower obstetrical intervention rates than do their urban counterparts, but the differences are not great.",
author = "Rosenblatt, {R. A.} and Saunders, {G. R.} and Tressler, {C. J.} and Larson, {E. H.} and Nesbitt, {T. S.} and Nesbitt, {Thomas S}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "479--489",
journal = "International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care",
issn = "0266-4623",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The diffusion of obstetric technology into rural U.S. hospitals

AU - Rosenblatt, R. A.

AU - Saunders, G. R.

AU - Tressler, C. J.

AU - Larson, E. H.

AU - Nesbitt, T. S.

AU - Nesbitt, Thomas S

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - We determined the distribution and sophistication of obstetric technologies in all 80 maternity hospitals in the state of Washington and examined the effect of rural or urban location, birth volume, and physician staffing on technological intensity. Although smaller and more rural hospitals refer most premature and low-birth weight infants to regional referral centers, sophisticated prenatal and intrapartum technologies are available in the majority of even the smallest and most remote rural units. Rural hospitals have slightly lower obstetrical intervention rates than do their urban counterparts, but the differences are not great.

AB - We determined the distribution and sophistication of obstetric technologies in all 80 maternity hospitals in the state of Washington and examined the effect of rural or urban location, birth volume, and physician staffing on technological intensity. Although smaller and more rural hospitals refer most premature and low-birth weight infants to regional referral centers, sophisticated prenatal and intrapartum technologies are available in the majority of even the smallest and most remote rural units. Rural hospitals have slightly lower obstetrical intervention rates than do their urban counterparts, but the differences are not great.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028279610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028279610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8071008

AN - SCOPUS:0028279610

VL - 10

SP - 479

EP - 489

JO - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

JF - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

SN - 0266-4623

IS - 3

ER -