The conditional release of insanity acquittees: Three decades of decision-making

Barbara E McDermott, Charles L Scott, David Busse, Felecia Andrade, Michelle Zozaya, Cameron D. Quanbeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The problem with the practical application of decision-making regarding release of mentally ill defenders lies in the inherently ambiguous definitions of mental illness and dangerousness, both of which are necessary for the continued commitment of insanity acquittees. In this study, we examined how clinicians make release decisions in a forensic facility, with particular attention paid to how such decision-making may have changed over time. Records were reviewed to determine documented criteria indicating readiness for release. The results indicated that compliance and treatment response were the primary reasons that the patients were judged ready for release. In addition, increasing attention to the use of substances as a risk factor was evident in the records, with substantially more documentation found in the most recent decade. Our data suggest that clinicians view three concerns to be of primary import when making release decisions: responsiveness to and compliance with the treatment, substance use, and risk of violence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-336
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
Volume36
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Dangerous Behavior
Mentally Ill Persons
Violence
Documentation
Compliance
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

The conditional release of insanity acquittees : Three decades of decision-making. / McDermott, Barbara E; Scott, Charles L; Busse, David; Andrade, Felecia; Zozaya, Michelle; Quanbeck, Cameron D.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2008, p. 329-336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McDermott, Barbara E ; Scott, Charles L ; Busse, David ; Andrade, Felecia ; Zozaya, Michelle ; Quanbeck, Cameron D. / The conditional release of insanity acquittees : Three decades of decision-making. In: Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 2008 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 329-336.
@article{29027a3bd4f14bb1982dc9f7748e2ea2,
title = "The conditional release of insanity acquittees: Three decades of decision-making",
abstract = "The problem with the practical application of decision-making regarding release of mentally ill defenders lies in the inherently ambiguous definitions of mental illness and dangerousness, both of which are necessary for the continued commitment of insanity acquittees. In this study, we examined how clinicians make release decisions in a forensic facility, with particular attention paid to how such decision-making may have changed over time. Records were reviewed to determine documented criteria indicating readiness for release. The results indicated that compliance and treatment response were the primary reasons that the patients were judged ready for release. In addition, increasing attention to the use of substances as a risk factor was evident in the records, with substantially more documentation found in the most recent decade. Our data suggest that clinicians view three concerns to be of primary import when making release decisions: responsiveness to and compliance with the treatment, substance use, and risk of violence.",
author = "McDermott, {Barbara E} and Scott, {Charles L} and David Busse and Felecia Andrade and Michelle Zozaya and Quanbeck, {Cameron D.}",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "329--336",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
issn = "1093-6793",
publisher = "American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conditional release of insanity acquittees

T2 - Three decades of decision-making

AU - McDermott, Barbara E

AU - Scott, Charles L

AU - Busse, David

AU - Andrade, Felecia

AU - Zozaya, Michelle

AU - Quanbeck, Cameron D.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The problem with the practical application of decision-making regarding release of mentally ill defenders lies in the inherently ambiguous definitions of mental illness and dangerousness, both of which are necessary for the continued commitment of insanity acquittees. In this study, we examined how clinicians make release decisions in a forensic facility, with particular attention paid to how such decision-making may have changed over time. Records were reviewed to determine documented criteria indicating readiness for release. The results indicated that compliance and treatment response were the primary reasons that the patients were judged ready for release. In addition, increasing attention to the use of substances as a risk factor was evident in the records, with substantially more documentation found in the most recent decade. Our data suggest that clinicians view three concerns to be of primary import when making release decisions: responsiveness to and compliance with the treatment, substance use, and risk of violence.

AB - The problem with the practical application of decision-making regarding release of mentally ill defenders lies in the inherently ambiguous definitions of mental illness and dangerousness, both of which are necessary for the continued commitment of insanity acquittees. In this study, we examined how clinicians make release decisions in a forensic facility, with particular attention paid to how such decision-making may have changed over time. Records were reviewed to determine documented criteria indicating readiness for release. The results indicated that compliance and treatment response were the primary reasons that the patients were judged ready for release. In addition, increasing attention to the use of substances as a risk factor was evident in the records, with substantially more documentation found in the most recent decade. Our data suggest that clinicians view three concerns to be of primary import when making release decisions: responsiveness to and compliance with the treatment, substance use, and risk of violence.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54949089223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54949089223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18802180

AN - SCOPUS:54949089223

VL - 36

SP - 329

EP - 336

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

SN - 1093-6793

IS - 3

ER -