The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation

Philip R Wolinsky, Douglas Dennis, Brett D. Crist, Shane Curtiss, Scott J. Hazelwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine if 1) angularly stable devices created by compressing ("locking") proximal locking screws to intramedullary nails using end caps or compression screws or 2) increasing the number of proximal screws from two to three increases the stiffness of intramedullary constructs that stabilize proximal third tibia fractures in a nonosteopenic bone model. Methods: Four proximal locking screw configurations were examined in a synthetic composite tibia model with a 2-cm gap simulating a comminuted proximal third tibia fracture with no bony contact: 1) two proximal screws not compressed to the nail; 2) one of two proximal screws compressed to the nail; 3) two proximal screws compressed to the nail; and 4) three proximal screws with only the most proximal screw compressed to the nail. An 11-mm tibial nail with two distal locking screws was used. Stiffness was measured in axial and torsional loading. An analysis of variance was performed to compare results of the screw configurations for each testing mode. Results: Compressing two screws to the nail produced 22% to 39% greater (P ≤ 0.01) axial and 16% to 29% greater (P ≤ 0.03) torsional stiffness than securing neither or only one of the screws. Adding a third proximal transverse locking screw increased the axial stiffness by 28% (P = 0.005) and the torsional stiffness by 15% to 28% (P ≤ 0.04) compared with using two oblique proximal screws. Conclusions: "Locking" two proximal locking screws to the nail through compression or adding a third proximal screw increases the axial and torsional stiffness of intramedullary nails used to fix unstable proximal third tibia fractures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-179
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Fracture Fixation
Tibial Fractures
Nails
Biomechanical Phenomena
Tibia
Weight-Bearing
Analysis of Variance
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Angular stability
  • Biomechanics
  • Intramedullary fixation
  • Metaphyseal
  • Sawbones
  • Tibia fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation. / Wolinsky, Philip R; Dennis, Douglas; Crist, Brett D.; Curtiss, Shane; Hazelwood, Scott J.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, Vol. 25, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 175-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wolinsky, Philip R ; Dennis, Douglas ; Crist, Brett D. ; Curtiss, Shane ; Hazelwood, Scott J. / The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2011 ; Vol. 25, No. 3. pp. 175-179.
@article{8ba76a396412466b953a9403ae1d7e67,
title = "The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine if 1) angularly stable devices created by compressing ({"}locking{"}) proximal locking screws to intramedullary nails using end caps or compression screws or 2) increasing the number of proximal screws from two to three increases the stiffness of intramedullary constructs that stabilize proximal third tibia fractures in a nonosteopenic bone model. Methods: Four proximal locking screw configurations were examined in a synthetic composite tibia model with a 2-cm gap simulating a comminuted proximal third tibia fracture with no bony contact: 1) two proximal screws not compressed to the nail; 2) one of two proximal screws compressed to the nail; 3) two proximal screws compressed to the nail; and 4) three proximal screws with only the most proximal screw compressed to the nail. An 11-mm tibial nail with two distal locking screws was used. Stiffness was measured in axial and torsional loading. An analysis of variance was performed to compare results of the screw configurations for each testing mode. Results: Compressing two screws to the nail produced 22{\%} to 39{\%} greater (P ≤ 0.01) axial and 16{\%} to 29{\%} greater (P ≤ 0.03) torsional stiffness than securing neither or only one of the screws. Adding a third proximal transverse locking screw increased the axial stiffness by 28{\%} (P = 0.005) and the torsional stiffness by 15{\%} to 28{\%} (P ≤ 0.04) compared with using two oblique proximal screws. Conclusions: {"}Locking{"} two proximal locking screws to the nail through compression or adding a third proximal screw increases the axial and torsional stiffness of intramedullary nails used to fix unstable proximal third tibia fractures.",
keywords = "Angular stability, Biomechanics, Intramedullary fixation, Metaphyseal, Sawbones, Tibia fractures",
author = "Wolinsky, {Philip R} and Douglas Dennis and Crist, {Brett D.} and Shane Curtiss and Hazelwood, {Scott J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d0f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "175--179",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma",
issn = "0890-5339",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The biomechanics of varied proximal locking screw configurations in a synthetic model of proximal third tibial fracture fixation

AU - Wolinsky, Philip R

AU - Dennis, Douglas

AU - Crist, Brett D.

AU - Curtiss, Shane

AU - Hazelwood, Scott J.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Objective: To determine if 1) angularly stable devices created by compressing ("locking") proximal locking screws to intramedullary nails using end caps or compression screws or 2) increasing the number of proximal screws from two to three increases the stiffness of intramedullary constructs that stabilize proximal third tibia fractures in a nonosteopenic bone model. Methods: Four proximal locking screw configurations were examined in a synthetic composite tibia model with a 2-cm gap simulating a comminuted proximal third tibia fracture with no bony contact: 1) two proximal screws not compressed to the nail; 2) one of two proximal screws compressed to the nail; 3) two proximal screws compressed to the nail; and 4) three proximal screws with only the most proximal screw compressed to the nail. An 11-mm tibial nail with two distal locking screws was used. Stiffness was measured in axial and torsional loading. An analysis of variance was performed to compare results of the screw configurations for each testing mode. Results: Compressing two screws to the nail produced 22% to 39% greater (P ≤ 0.01) axial and 16% to 29% greater (P ≤ 0.03) torsional stiffness than securing neither or only one of the screws. Adding a third proximal transverse locking screw increased the axial stiffness by 28% (P = 0.005) and the torsional stiffness by 15% to 28% (P ≤ 0.04) compared with using two oblique proximal screws. Conclusions: "Locking" two proximal locking screws to the nail through compression or adding a third proximal screw increases the axial and torsional stiffness of intramedullary nails used to fix unstable proximal third tibia fractures.

AB - Objective: To determine if 1) angularly stable devices created by compressing ("locking") proximal locking screws to intramedullary nails using end caps or compression screws or 2) increasing the number of proximal screws from two to three increases the stiffness of intramedullary constructs that stabilize proximal third tibia fractures in a nonosteopenic bone model. Methods: Four proximal locking screw configurations were examined in a synthetic composite tibia model with a 2-cm gap simulating a comminuted proximal third tibia fracture with no bony contact: 1) two proximal screws not compressed to the nail; 2) one of two proximal screws compressed to the nail; 3) two proximal screws compressed to the nail; and 4) three proximal screws with only the most proximal screw compressed to the nail. An 11-mm tibial nail with two distal locking screws was used. Stiffness was measured in axial and torsional loading. An analysis of variance was performed to compare results of the screw configurations for each testing mode. Results: Compressing two screws to the nail produced 22% to 39% greater (P ≤ 0.01) axial and 16% to 29% greater (P ≤ 0.03) torsional stiffness than securing neither or only one of the screws. Adding a third proximal transverse locking screw increased the axial stiffness by 28% (P = 0.005) and the torsional stiffness by 15% to 28% (P ≤ 0.04) compared with using two oblique proximal screws. Conclusions: "Locking" two proximal locking screws to the nail through compression or adding a third proximal screw increases the axial and torsional stiffness of intramedullary nails used to fix unstable proximal third tibia fractures.

KW - Angular stability

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Intramedullary fixation

KW - Metaphyseal

KW - Sawbones

KW - Tibia fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951768023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951768023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d0f

DO - 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e47d0f

M3 - Article

C2 - 21278608

AN - SCOPUS:79951768023

VL - 25

SP - 175

EP - 179

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

SN - 0890-5339

IS - 3

ER -