The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology

Lydia P Howell, Robin L. Davis, Timothy I. Belk, Rolando Agdigos, Jesse Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if thin-layer processing of cervicovaginal samples improves detection of cytologic abnormalities by reducing problems related to direct smear preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Eight hundred fifty-two cervical samples were collected as part of a multicenter trial of the CytoRich/AutoCyte system. The Cervex Brush was used for specimen collection. Following preparation of a conventional Papanicolaou smear, the brush was placed in a vial of fixative. A thinlayer CytoRich preparation was prepared by sedimentation following centrifugation through a density gradient and then stained by the AutoCyte Preparation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The two preparations were masked and screened, and a diagnosis was rendered. Abnormal results from were reviewed by a pathologist. The specimens were later unmasked and the diagnoses compared. RESULTS: CytoRich and conventional cervical cytologic smears detected an equivalent number of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (27 vs. 29) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (19 vs. 21). Both methods missed an equivalent number of SILs (four vs. five). CytoRich detected more infections (151 vs. 115) and had 66% fewer nonspecific inflammatory diagnoses. CytoRich also had fewer 'limited' adequacy evaluations (211 vs. 236). CONCLUSION: CytoRich preps improve adequacy; increase detection of infections, such as candidiasis and trichomoniasis; and are accurate in the diagnosis of SILs. CytoRich appears to be an equivalent and possibly better preparation for cervicovaginal cytology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)171-177
Number of pages7
JournalActa Cytologica
Volume42
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Cell Biology
Specimen Handling
Papanicolaou Test
Fixatives
Vaginal Smears
Candidiasis
Delayed Diagnosis
Infection
Centrifugation
Multicenter Studies
Guidelines
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
Pathologists
Atypical Squamous Cells of the Cervix

Keywords

  • AutoCyte Preparation System
  • Automation
  • Cervical smears
  • Cervix neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Cell Biology
  • Histology

Cite this

Howell, L. P., Davis, R. L., Belk, T. I., Agdigos, R., & Lowe, J. (1998). The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology. Acta Cytologica, 42(1), 171-177.

The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology. / Howell, Lydia P; Davis, Robin L.; Belk, Timothy I.; Agdigos, Rolando; Lowe, Jesse.

In: Acta Cytologica, Vol. 42, No. 1, 1998, p. 171-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howell, LP, Davis, RL, Belk, TI, Agdigos, R & Lowe, J 1998, 'The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology', Acta Cytologica, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 171-177.
Howell LP, Davis RL, Belk TI, Agdigos R, Lowe J. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology. Acta Cytologica. 1998;42(1):171-177.
Howell, Lydia P ; Davis, Robin L. ; Belk, Timothy I. ; Agdigos, Rolando ; Lowe, Jesse. / The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology. In: Acta Cytologica. 1998 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 171-177.
@article{bbb756ea2237446ea7df369732c51c56,
title = "The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine if thin-layer processing of cervicovaginal samples improves detection of cytologic abnormalities by reducing problems related to direct smear preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Eight hundred fifty-two cervical samples were collected as part of a multicenter trial of the CytoRich/AutoCyte system. The Cervex Brush was used for specimen collection. Following preparation of a conventional Papanicolaou smear, the brush was placed in a vial of fixative. A thinlayer CytoRich preparation was prepared by sedimentation following centrifugation through a density gradient and then stained by the AutoCyte Preparation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The two preparations were masked and screened, and a diagnosis was rendered. Abnormal results from were reviewed by a pathologist. The specimens were later unmasked and the diagnoses compared. RESULTS: CytoRich and conventional cervical cytologic smears detected an equivalent number of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (27 vs. 29) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (19 vs. 21). Both methods missed an equivalent number of SILs (four vs. five). CytoRich detected more infections (151 vs. 115) and had 66{\%} fewer nonspecific inflammatory diagnoses. CytoRich also had fewer 'limited' adequacy evaluations (211 vs. 236). CONCLUSION: CytoRich preps improve adequacy; increase detection of infections, such as candidiasis and trichomoniasis; and are accurate in the diagnosis of SILs. CytoRich appears to be an equivalent and possibly better preparation for cervicovaginal cytology.",
keywords = "AutoCyte Preparation System, Automation, Cervical smears, Cervix neoplasms",
author = "Howell, {Lydia P} and Davis, {Robin L.} and Belk, {Timothy I.} and Rolando Agdigos and Jesse Lowe",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "171--177",
journal = "Acta Cytologica",
issn = "0001-5547",
publisher = "Science Printers and Publishers Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology

AU - Howell, Lydia P

AU - Davis, Robin L.

AU - Belk, Timothy I.

AU - Agdigos, Rolando

AU - Lowe, Jesse

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine if thin-layer processing of cervicovaginal samples improves detection of cytologic abnormalities by reducing problems related to direct smear preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Eight hundred fifty-two cervical samples were collected as part of a multicenter trial of the CytoRich/AutoCyte system. The Cervex Brush was used for specimen collection. Following preparation of a conventional Papanicolaou smear, the brush was placed in a vial of fixative. A thinlayer CytoRich preparation was prepared by sedimentation following centrifugation through a density gradient and then stained by the AutoCyte Preparation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The two preparations were masked and screened, and a diagnosis was rendered. Abnormal results from were reviewed by a pathologist. The specimens were later unmasked and the diagnoses compared. RESULTS: CytoRich and conventional cervical cytologic smears detected an equivalent number of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (27 vs. 29) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (19 vs. 21). Both methods missed an equivalent number of SILs (four vs. five). CytoRich detected more infections (151 vs. 115) and had 66% fewer nonspecific inflammatory diagnoses. CytoRich also had fewer 'limited' adequacy evaluations (211 vs. 236). CONCLUSION: CytoRich preps improve adequacy; increase detection of infections, such as candidiasis and trichomoniasis; and are accurate in the diagnosis of SILs. CytoRich appears to be an equivalent and possibly better preparation for cervicovaginal cytology.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine if thin-layer processing of cervicovaginal samples improves detection of cytologic abnormalities by reducing problems related to direct smear preparation. STUDY DESIGN: Eight hundred fifty-two cervical samples were collected as part of a multicenter trial of the CytoRich/AutoCyte system. The Cervex Brush was used for specimen collection. Following preparation of a conventional Papanicolaou smear, the brush was placed in a vial of fixative. A thinlayer CytoRich preparation was prepared by sedimentation following centrifugation through a density gradient and then stained by the AutoCyte Preparation System according to the manufacturer's guidelines. The two preparations were masked and screened, and a diagnosis was rendered. Abnormal results from were reviewed by a pathologist. The specimens were later unmasked and the diagnoses compared. RESULTS: CytoRich and conventional cervical cytologic smears detected an equivalent number of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) (27 vs. 29) and atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) (19 vs. 21). Both methods missed an equivalent number of SILs (four vs. five). CytoRich detected more infections (151 vs. 115) and had 66% fewer nonspecific inflammatory diagnoses. CytoRich also had fewer 'limited' adequacy evaluations (211 vs. 236). CONCLUSION: CytoRich preps improve adequacy; increase detection of infections, such as candidiasis and trichomoniasis; and are accurate in the diagnosis of SILs. CytoRich appears to be an equivalent and possibly better preparation for cervicovaginal cytology.

KW - AutoCyte Preparation System

KW - Automation

KW - Cervical smears

KW - Cervix neoplasms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031908076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031908076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9479336

AN - SCOPUS:0031908076

VL - 42

SP - 171

EP - 177

JO - Acta Cytologica

JF - Acta Cytologica

SN - 0001-5547

IS - 1

ER -