The artifact of retinoscopy revisited: Comparison of refractive error measured by retinoscopy and visual evoked potential in the rat

Donald O. Mutti, James N. Ver Hoeve, Karla Zadnik, Christopher J Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. The validity of retinoscopy in small eyes has not been clearly established due to uncertainty regarding the source of the ocular reflections assessed during this procedure. A widely cited model which proposes that their origin is the inner limiting membrane of the retina was evaluated in the rat by comparing refractive errors measured by retinoscopy to those measured by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Methods. Ten rats were refracted both by cycloplegic streak retinoscopy and by VEP while viewing 0 05 to 0.15 cpd square-wave gratings reversed at 1.875 Hz. Spherical aberration of the rat eye was assessed as a potentially confounding variable in VEP refraction by sequential retinoscopic refractions across the rat's natural pupil through a 1.5-mm pinhole. Results. All animals were moderately to highly hyperopic by both methods (range = +4.5 to +18.5 D). Spherical aberration was minimal (median = 3.5 D of overcorrected aberration). The median difference between retinoscopic refractions and those by VEP was not significant (+1.94 D more hyperopia by retinoscopy; p = 0.062, Wilcoxon signed rank) but was significantly less than the +9.64 D difference predicted by an inner limiting membrane model (upper 95% limit = +3.76 D). Conclusion. This suggests that the origin of the retinoscopic reflex is located in the outer retina rather than at the inner limiting membrane. Correction factors for retinoscopy in small eyes may be smaller than previously assumed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)483-488
Number of pages6
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume74
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Retinoscopy
Refractive Errors
Visual Evoked Potentials
Artifacts
Membranes
Retina
Mydriatics
Hyperopia
Confounding Factors (Epidemiology)
Pupil
Uncertainty
Reflex

Keywords

  • Artifact
  • Optics
  • Rat
  • Retinoscopy
  • Waveguide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

The artifact of retinoscopy revisited : Comparison of refractive error measured by retinoscopy and visual evoked potential in the rat. / Mutti, Donald O.; Ver Hoeve, James N.; Zadnik, Karla; Murphy, Christopher J.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 74, No. 7, 07.1997, p. 483-488.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cd5a82863f340958d8ab0f3c114b64c,
title = "The artifact of retinoscopy revisited: Comparison of refractive error measured by retinoscopy and visual evoked potential in the rat",
abstract = "Purpose. The validity of retinoscopy in small eyes has not been clearly established due to uncertainty regarding the source of the ocular reflections assessed during this procedure. A widely cited model which proposes that their origin is the inner limiting membrane of the retina was evaluated in the rat by comparing refractive errors measured by retinoscopy to those measured by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Methods. Ten rats were refracted both by cycloplegic streak retinoscopy and by VEP while viewing 0 05 to 0.15 cpd square-wave gratings reversed at 1.875 Hz. Spherical aberration of the rat eye was assessed as a potentially confounding variable in VEP refraction by sequential retinoscopic refractions across the rat's natural pupil through a 1.5-mm pinhole. Results. All animals were moderately to highly hyperopic by both methods (range = +4.5 to +18.5 D). Spherical aberration was minimal (median = 3.5 D of overcorrected aberration). The median difference between retinoscopic refractions and those by VEP was not significant (+1.94 D more hyperopia by retinoscopy; p = 0.062, Wilcoxon signed rank) but was significantly less than the +9.64 D difference predicted by an inner limiting membrane model (upper 95{\%} limit = +3.76 D). Conclusion. This suggests that the origin of the retinoscopic reflex is located in the outer retina rather than at the inner limiting membrane. Correction factors for retinoscopy in small eyes may be smaller than previously assumed.",
keywords = "Artifact, Optics, Rat, Retinoscopy, Waveguide",
author = "Mutti, {Donald O.} and {Ver Hoeve}, {James N.} and Karla Zadnik and Murphy, {Christopher J}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/00006324-199707000-00014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "483--488",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The artifact of retinoscopy revisited

T2 - Comparison of refractive error measured by retinoscopy and visual evoked potential in the rat

AU - Mutti, Donald O.

AU - Ver Hoeve, James N.

AU - Zadnik, Karla

AU - Murphy, Christopher J

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - Purpose. The validity of retinoscopy in small eyes has not been clearly established due to uncertainty regarding the source of the ocular reflections assessed during this procedure. A widely cited model which proposes that their origin is the inner limiting membrane of the retina was evaluated in the rat by comparing refractive errors measured by retinoscopy to those measured by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Methods. Ten rats were refracted both by cycloplegic streak retinoscopy and by VEP while viewing 0 05 to 0.15 cpd square-wave gratings reversed at 1.875 Hz. Spherical aberration of the rat eye was assessed as a potentially confounding variable in VEP refraction by sequential retinoscopic refractions across the rat's natural pupil through a 1.5-mm pinhole. Results. All animals were moderately to highly hyperopic by both methods (range = +4.5 to +18.5 D). Spherical aberration was minimal (median = 3.5 D of overcorrected aberration). The median difference between retinoscopic refractions and those by VEP was not significant (+1.94 D more hyperopia by retinoscopy; p = 0.062, Wilcoxon signed rank) but was significantly less than the +9.64 D difference predicted by an inner limiting membrane model (upper 95% limit = +3.76 D). Conclusion. This suggests that the origin of the retinoscopic reflex is located in the outer retina rather than at the inner limiting membrane. Correction factors for retinoscopy in small eyes may be smaller than previously assumed.

AB - Purpose. The validity of retinoscopy in small eyes has not been clearly established due to uncertainty regarding the source of the ocular reflections assessed during this procedure. A widely cited model which proposes that their origin is the inner limiting membrane of the retina was evaluated in the rat by comparing refractive errors measured by retinoscopy to those measured by visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Methods. Ten rats were refracted both by cycloplegic streak retinoscopy and by VEP while viewing 0 05 to 0.15 cpd square-wave gratings reversed at 1.875 Hz. Spherical aberration of the rat eye was assessed as a potentially confounding variable in VEP refraction by sequential retinoscopic refractions across the rat's natural pupil through a 1.5-mm pinhole. Results. All animals were moderately to highly hyperopic by both methods (range = +4.5 to +18.5 D). Spherical aberration was minimal (median = 3.5 D of overcorrected aberration). The median difference between retinoscopic refractions and those by VEP was not significant (+1.94 D more hyperopia by retinoscopy; p = 0.062, Wilcoxon signed rank) but was significantly less than the +9.64 D difference predicted by an inner limiting membrane model (upper 95% limit = +3.76 D). Conclusion. This suggests that the origin of the retinoscopic reflex is located in the outer retina rather than at the inner limiting membrane. Correction factors for retinoscopy in small eyes may be smaller than previously assumed.

KW - Artifact

KW - Optics

KW - Rat

KW - Retinoscopy

KW - Waveguide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031194935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031194935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00014

DO - 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00014

M3 - Article

C2 - 9293514

AN - SCOPUS:0031194935

VL - 74

SP - 483

EP - 488

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 7

ER -