TH‐D‐213A‐03: Physiological Validation of 4D‐CT‐Based Ventilation Imaging in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Tokihiro Yamamoto, S. Kabus, J. Von Berg, T. Klinder, T. Blaffert, C. Lorenz, P. Keall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Four‐dimensional (4D) CT‐based pulmonary ventilation imaging is a new technique and has advantages in speed, resolution, cost and availability. However, the physiological accuracy has not been validated, especially for regional ventilation. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging by comparison with distribution and progression of emphysema. Method and Materials: The 4D‐CT images were acquired for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes using the GE multislice PET/CT scanner with the Varian RPM system. Ventilation was evaluated for five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer by calculating peak‐inhale to peak‐exhale displacement vector fields (DVFs), and then ventilation based on the Jacobian determinant of deformation. To derive DVFs, we used two fundamentally different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms: surface‐based registration (DIRs) and volume‐based registration (DIRv), of which the geometric accuracy has been validated. The peak‐inhale 4D‐CT images were used for emphysema quantification. Emphysematous lungs were detected by the density masking technique. The 15th percentile point was used as a measure of emphysema progression. Results: There were large discrepancies between distributions of emphysema and ventilation, and between ventilation calculated by two different algorithms. The mean relative volumes of emphysema outside poor‐ventilated lungs were 0.665 (range, 0.520–0.901) and 0.709 (range, 0.464–0.933) for DIRv and DIRv, respectively. There were very weak (−0.013) to strong (−0.763) negative correlations between emphysema progression and the mean ventilation. The use of an algorithm parameter with more or less elasticity for DIRv led to improved coverage of emphysema as well as correlations. Conclusion: This work represents the first physiological validation of 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging. Our results demonstrated large discrepancies between ventilation and emphysema. However, a trend toward negative correlation and effects of algorithm parameters indicated promise for this technique. Conflict of Interest: SK, JB, TK, TB and CL are employees of Philips Research Europe.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Emphysema
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Ventilation
Lung Neoplasms
Pulmonary Ventilation
Conflict of Interest
Lung
Elasticity
Radiotherapy
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

TH‐D‐213A‐03 : Physiological Validation of 4D‐CT‐Based Ventilation Imaging in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). / Yamamoto, Tokihiro; Kabus, S.; Von Berg, J.; Klinder, T.; Blaffert, T.; Lorenz, C.; Keall, P.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5573296600b42d8a10f8b81bb0532a4,
title = "TH‐D‐213A‐03: Physiological Validation of 4D‐CT‐Based Ventilation Imaging in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)",
abstract = "Purpose: Four‐dimensional (4D) CT‐based pulmonary ventilation imaging is a new technique and has advantages in speed, resolution, cost and availability. However, the physiological accuracy has not been validated, especially for regional ventilation. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging by comparison with distribution and progression of emphysema. Method and Materials: The 4D‐CT images were acquired for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes using the GE multislice PET/CT scanner with the Varian RPM system. Ventilation was evaluated for five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer by calculating peak‐inhale to peak‐exhale displacement vector fields (DVFs), and then ventilation based on the Jacobian determinant of deformation. To derive DVFs, we used two fundamentally different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms: surface‐based registration (DIRs) and volume‐based registration (DIRv), of which the geometric accuracy has been validated. The peak‐inhale 4D‐CT images were used for emphysema quantification. Emphysematous lungs were detected by the density masking technique. The 15th percentile point was used as a measure of emphysema progression. Results: There were large discrepancies between distributions of emphysema and ventilation, and between ventilation calculated by two different algorithms. The mean relative volumes of emphysema outside poor‐ventilated lungs were 0.665 (range, 0.520–0.901) and 0.709 (range, 0.464–0.933) for DIRv and DIRv, respectively. There were very weak (−0.013) to strong (−0.763) negative correlations between emphysema progression and the mean ventilation. The use of an algorithm parameter with more or less elasticity for DIRv led to improved coverage of emphysema as well as correlations. Conclusion: This work represents the first physiological validation of 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging. Our results demonstrated large discrepancies between ventilation and emphysema. However, a trend toward negative correlation and effects of algorithm parameters indicated promise for this technique. Conflict of Interest: SK, JB, TK, TB and CL are employees of Philips Research Europe.",
author = "Tokihiro Yamamoto and S. Kabus and {Von Berg}, J. and T. Klinder and T. Blaffert and C. Lorenz and P. Keall",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182715",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - TH‐D‐213A‐03

T2 - Physiological Validation of 4D‐CT‐Based Ventilation Imaging in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

AU - Yamamoto, Tokihiro

AU - Kabus, S.

AU - Von Berg, J.

AU - Klinder, T.

AU - Blaffert, T.

AU - Lorenz, C.

AU - Keall, P.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: Four‐dimensional (4D) CT‐based pulmonary ventilation imaging is a new technique and has advantages in speed, resolution, cost and availability. However, the physiological accuracy has not been validated, especially for regional ventilation. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging by comparison with distribution and progression of emphysema. Method and Materials: The 4D‐CT images were acquired for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes using the GE multislice PET/CT scanner with the Varian RPM system. Ventilation was evaluated for five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer by calculating peak‐inhale to peak‐exhale displacement vector fields (DVFs), and then ventilation based on the Jacobian determinant of deformation. To derive DVFs, we used two fundamentally different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms: surface‐based registration (DIRs) and volume‐based registration (DIRv), of which the geometric accuracy has been validated. The peak‐inhale 4D‐CT images were used for emphysema quantification. Emphysematous lungs were detected by the density masking technique. The 15th percentile point was used as a measure of emphysema progression. Results: There were large discrepancies between distributions of emphysema and ventilation, and between ventilation calculated by two different algorithms. The mean relative volumes of emphysema outside poor‐ventilated lungs were 0.665 (range, 0.520–0.901) and 0.709 (range, 0.464–0.933) for DIRv and DIRv, respectively. There were very weak (−0.013) to strong (−0.763) negative correlations between emphysema progression and the mean ventilation. The use of an algorithm parameter with more or less elasticity for DIRv led to improved coverage of emphysema as well as correlations. Conclusion: This work represents the first physiological validation of 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging. Our results demonstrated large discrepancies between ventilation and emphysema. However, a trend toward negative correlation and effects of algorithm parameters indicated promise for this technique. Conflict of Interest: SK, JB, TK, TB and CL are employees of Philips Research Europe.

AB - Purpose: Four‐dimensional (4D) CT‐based pulmonary ventilation imaging is a new technique and has advantages in speed, resolution, cost and availability. However, the physiological accuracy has not been validated, especially for regional ventilation. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging by comparison with distribution and progression of emphysema. Method and Materials: The 4D‐CT images were acquired for radiotherapy treatment planning purposes using the GE multislice PET/CT scanner with the Varian RPM system. Ventilation was evaluated for five patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and lung cancer by calculating peak‐inhale to peak‐exhale displacement vector fields (DVFs), and then ventilation based on the Jacobian determinant of deformation. To derive DVFs, we used two fundamentally different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms: surface‐based registration (DIRs) and volume‐based registration (DIRv), of which the geometric accuracy has been validated. The peak‐inhale 4D‐CT images were used for emphysema quantification. Emphysematous lungs were detected by the density masking technique. The 15th percentile point was used as a measure of emphysema progression. Results: There were large discrepancies between distributions of emphysema and ventilation, and between ventilation calculated by two different algorithms. The mean relative volumes of emphysema outside poor‐ventilated lungs were 0.665 (range, 0.520–0.901) and 0.709 (range, 0.464–0.933) for DIRv and DIRv, respectively. There were very weak (−0.013) to strong (−0.763) negative correlations between emphysema progression and the mean ventilation. The use of an algorithm parameter with more or less elasticity for DIRv led to improved coverage of emphysema as well as correlations. Conclusion: This work represents the first physiological validation of 4D‐CT‐based ventilation imaging. Our results demonstrated large discrepancies between ventilation and emphysema. However, a trend toward negative correlation and effects of algorithm parameters indicated promise for this technique. Conflict of Interest: SK, JB, TK, TB and CL are employees of Philips Research Europe.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956585389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956585389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182715

DO - 10.1118/1.3182715

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77956585389

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -