Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs

Dale A. Moore, John M Adaska, Gerald E. Higginbotham, Alejandro R. Castillo, Carol Collar, William M. Sischo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dairy producers seldom test or examine incoming cattle, although these important biosecurity practices are recommended. This pilot project examined risk management decisions that producers make when faced with test-positive animals in purchased groups of dairy cattle, in order to provide information on disease risks and conditions that could affect animal health and performance. New arrivals to seven herds at dairy farms in four California counties were examined and tested for a range of conditions. The most common findings were bovine leukosis virus (33% of cattle purchased) and male reproductive abnormalities (16% of bulls purchased). Once testing results were known, producers made a variety of risk management decisions. Although testing costs for some conditions outweigh the benefits of finding an infected animal, an individual producer's decision to test new animals most likely depends on their knowledge of the pros and cons as well as their risk tolerance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-34
Number of pages6
JournalCalifornia Agriculture
Volume63
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2009

Fingerprint

herd health
cattle diseases
dairy cattle
cattle
cost
risk management
animal
testing
abnormality
virus
tolerance
enzootic bovine leukosis
animals
biosecurity
animal performance
animal health
dairy farming
bulls
dairies
herds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Plant Science
  • Forestry

Cite this

Moore, D. A., Adaska, J. M., Higginbotham, G. E., Castillo, A. R., Collar, C., & Sischo, W. M. (2009). Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs. California Agriculture, 63(1), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v063n01p29

Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs. / Moore, Dale A.; Adaska, John M; Higginbotham, Gerald E.; Castillo, Alejandro R.; Collar, Carol; Sischo, William M.

In: California Agriculture, Vol. 63, No. 1, 01.2009, p. 29-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moore, DA, Adaska, JM, Higginbotham, GE, Castillo, AR, Collar, C & Sischo, WM 2009, 'Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs', California Agriculture, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 29-34. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v063n01p29
Moore, Dale A. ; Adaska, John M ; Higginbotham, Gerald E. ; Castillo, Alejandro R. ; Collar, Carol ; Sischo, William M. / Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs. In: California Agriculture. 2009 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 29-34.
@article{1ff91492d4c34f41918c63265e9a10bf,
title = "Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs",
abstract = "Dairy producers seldom test or examine incoming cattle, although these important biosecurity practices are recommended. This pilot project examined risk management decisions that producers make when faced with test-positive animals in purchased groups of dairy cattle, in order to provide information on disease risks and conditions that could affect animal health and performance. New arrivals to seven herds at dairy farms in four California counties were examined and tested for a range of conditions. The most common findings were bovine leukosis virus (33{\%} of cattle purchased) and male reproductive abnormalities (16{\%} of bulls purchased). Once testing results were known, producers made a variety of risk management decisions. Although testing costs for some conditions outweigh the benefits of finding an infected animal, an individual producer's decision to test new animals most likely depends on their knowledge of the pros and cons as well as their risk tolerance.",
author = "Moore, {Dale A.} and Adaska, {John M} and Higginbotham, {Gerald E.} and Castillo, {Alejandro R.} and Carol Collar and Sischo, {William M.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3733/ca.v063n01p29",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "29--34",
journal = "California Agriculture",
issn = "0008-0845",
publisher = "California Agricultural Experiment Station",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Testing new dairy cattle for disease can boost herd health, cut costs

AU - Moore, Dale A.

AU - Adaska, John M

AU - Higginbotham, Gerald E.

AU - Castillo, Alejandro R.

AU - Collar, Carol

AU - Sischo, William M.

PY - 2009/1

Y1 - 2009/1

N2 - Dairy producers seldom test or examine incoming cattle, although these important biosecurity practices are recommended. This pilot project examined risk management decisions that producers make when faced with test-positive animals in purchased groups of dairy cattle, in order to provide information on disease risks and conditions that could affect animal health and performance. New arrivals to seven herds at dairy farms in four California counties were examined and tested for a range of conditions. The most common findings were bovine leukosis virus (33% of cattle purchased) and male reproductive abnormalities (16% of bulls purchased). Once testing results were known, producers made a variety of risk management decisions. Although testing costs for some conditions outweigh the benefits of finding an infected animal, an individual producer's decision to test new animals most likely depends on their knowledge of the pros and cons as well as their risk tolerance.

AB - Dairy producers seldom test or examine incoming cattle, although these important biosecurity practices are recommended. This pilot project examined risk management decisions that producers make when faced with test-positive animals in purchased groups of dairy cattle, in order to provide information on disease risks and conditions that could affect animal health and performance. New arrivals to seven herds at dairy farms in four California counties were examined and tested for a range of conditions. The most common findings were bovine leukosis virus (33% of cattle purchased) and male reproductive abnormalities (16% of bulls purchased). Once testing results were known, producers made a variety of risk management decisions. Although testing costs for some conditions outweigh the benefits of finding an infected animal, an individual producer's decision to test new animals most likely depends on their knowledge of the pros and cons as well as their risk tolerance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955651777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955651777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3733/ca.v063n01p29

DO - 10.3733/ca.v063n01p29

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 29

EP - 34

JO - California Agriculture

JF - California Agriculture

SN - 0008-0845

IS - 1

ER -