Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy

Christina M. Ambrosi, Crystal M Ripplinger, Igor R. Efimov, Vadim V. Fedorov

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Defibrillation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) is limited by pain induced by high-energy shocks. Thus, lowering the defibrillation energy for AFl/AF is desirable. Objective In this study we applied low-voltage multiple-shock defibrillation therapy in a rabbit model of atrial tachyarrhythmias comparing its efficacy to single shocks and antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods Optical mapping was performed in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 18). Acetylcholine (7 ± 5 to 17 ± 16 μM) was administered to promote sustained AFl and AF, respectively. Single and multiple monophasic shocks were applied within 1 or 2 cycle lengths (CLs) of the arrhythmia. Results We observed AFl (CL = 83 ± 15 ms, n = 17) and AF (CL = 50 ± 8 ms, n = 11). ATP had a success rate of 66.7% in the case of AFl, but no success with AF (n = 9). Low-voltage multiple shocks had 100% success for both arrhythmias. Multiple low-voltage shocks terminated AFl at 0.86 ± 0.73 V/cm (within 1 CL) and 0.28 ± 0.13 V/cm (within 2 CLs), as compared with single shocks at 2.12 ± 1.31 V/cm (P < .001) and AF at 3.46 ± 3 V/cm (within 1 CL), as compared with single shocks at 6.83 ± 3.12 V/cm (P =.06). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced. Optical mapping revealed that termination of AFl was achieved by a properly timed, local shock-induced wave that collides with the arrhythmia wavefront, whereas AF required the majority of atrial tissue to be excited and reset for termination. Conclusion Low-voltage multiple-shock therapy terminates AFl and AF with different mechanisms and thresholds based on spatiotemporal characteristics of the arrhythmias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)101-108
Number of pages8
JournalHeart Rhythm
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Convulsive Therapy
Atrial Flutter
Atrial Fibrillation
Shock
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Rabbits
Tachycardia
Acetylcholine
Pain

Keywords

  • Antitachycardia pacing
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Atrial flutter
  • Defibrillation
  • Optical mapping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy. / Ambrosi, Christina M.; Ripplinger, Crystal M; Efimov, Igor R.; Fedorov, Vadim V.

In: Heart Rhythm, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 101-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ambrosi, Christina M. ; Ripplinger, Crystal M ; Efimov, Igor R. ; Fedorov, Vadim V. / Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy. In: Heart Rhythm. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 101-108.
@article{8ec03af64d9140d8a319f7ca5cbc80b4,
title = "Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy",
abstract = "Background Defibrillation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) is limited by pain induced by high-energy shocks. Thus, lowering the defibrillation energy for AFl/AF is desirable. Objective In this study we applied low-voltage multiple-shock defibrillation therapy in a rabbit model of atrial tachyarrhythmias comparing its efficacy to single shocks and antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods Optical mapping was performed in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 18). Acetylcholine (7 ± 5 to 17 ± 16 μM) was administered to promote sustained AFl and AF, respectively. Single and multiple monophasic shocks were applied within 1 or 2 cycle lengths (CLs) of the arrhythmia. Results We observed AFl (CL = 83 ± 15 ms, n = 17) and AF (CL = 50 ± 8 ms, n = 11). ATP had a success rate of 66.7{\%} in the case of AFl, but no success with AF (n = 9). Low-voltage multiple shocks had 100{\%} success for both arrhythmias. Multiple low-voltage shocks terminated AFl at 0.86 ± 0.73 V/cm (within 1 CL) and 0.28 ± 0.13 V/cm (within 2 CLs), as compared with single shocks at 2.12 ± 1.31 V/cm (P < .001) and AF at 3.46 ± 3 V/cm (within 1 CL), as compared with single shocks at 6.83 ± 3.12 V/cm (P =.06). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced. Optical mapping revealed that termination of AFl was achieved by a properly timed, local shock-induced wave that collides with the arrhythmia wavefront, whereas AF required the majority of atrial tissue to be excited and reset for termination. Conclusion Low-voltage multiple-shock therapy terminates AFl and AF with different mechanisms and thresholds based on spatiotemporal characteristics of the arrhythmias.",
keywords = "Antitachycardia pacing, Atrial fibrillation, Atrial flutter, Defibrillation, Optical mapping",
author = "Ambrosi, {Christina M.} and Ripplinger, {Crystal M} and Efimov, {Igor R.} and Fedorov, {Vadim V.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "101--108",
journal = "Heart Rhythm",
issn = "1547-5271",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy

AU - Ambrosi, Christina M.

AU - Ripplinger, Crystal M

AU - Efimov, Igor R.

AU - Fedorov, Vadim V.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background Defibrillation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) is limited by pain induced by high-energy shocks. Thus, lowering the defibrillation energy for AFl/AF is desirable. Objective In this study we applied low-voltage multiple-shock defibrillation therapy in a rabbit model of atrial tachyarrhythmias comparing its efficacy to single shocks and antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods Optical mapping was performed in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 18). Acetylcholine (7 ± 5 to 17 ± 16 μM) was administered to promote sustained AFl and AF, respectively. Single and multiple monophasic shocks were applied within 1 or 2 cycle lengths (CLs) of the arrhythmia. Results We observed AFl (CL = 83 ± 15 ms, n = 17) and AF (CL = 50 ± 8 ms, n = 11). ATP had a success rate of 66.7% in the case of AFl, but no success with AF (n = 9). Low-voltage multiple shocks had 100% success for both arrhythmias. Multiple low-voltage shocks terminated AFl at 0.86 ± 0.73 V/cm (within 1 CL) and 0.28 ± 0.13 V/cm (within 2 CLs), as compared with single shocks at 2.12 ± 1.31 V/cm (P < .001) and AF at 3.46 ± 3 V/cm (within 1 CL), as compared with single shocks at 6.83 ± 3.12 V/cm (P =.06). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced. Optical mapping revealed that termination of AFl was achieved by a properly timed, local shock-induced wave that collides with the arrhythmia wavefront, whereas AF required the majority of atrial tissue to be excited and reset for termination. Conclusion Low-voltage multiple-shock therapy terminates AFl and AF with different mechanisms and thresholds based on spatiotemporal characteristics of the arrhythmias.

AB - Background Defibrillation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter (AFl) is limited by pain induced by high-energy shocks. Thus, lowering the defibrillation energy for AFl/AF is desirable. Objective In this study we applied low-voltage multiple-shock defibrillation therapy in a rabbit model of atrial tachyarrhythmias comparing its efficacy to single shocks and antitachycardia pacing (ATP). Methods Optical mapping was performed in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 18). Acetylcholine (7 ± 5 to 17 ± 16 μM) was administered to promote sustained AFl and AF, respectively. Single and multiple monophasic shocks were applied within 1 or 2 cycle lengths (CLs) of the arrhythmia. Results We observed AFl (CL = 83 ± 15 ms, n = 17) and AF (CL = 50 ± 8 ms, n = 11). ATP had a success rate of 66.7% in the case of AFl, but no success with AF (n = 9). Low-voltage multiple shocks had 100% success for both arrhythmias. Multiple low-voltage shocks terminated AFl at 0.86 ± 0.73 V/cm (within 1 CL) and 0.28 ± 0.13 V/cm (within 2 CLs), as compared with single shocks at 2.12 ± 1.31 V/cm (P < .001) and AF at 3.46 ± 3 V/cm (within 1 CL), as compared with single shocks at 6.83 ± 3.12 V/cm (P =.06). No ventricular arrhythmias were induced. Optical mapping revealed that termination of AFl was achieved by a properly timed, local shock-induced wave that collides with the arrhythmia wavefront, whereas AF required the majority of atrial tissue to be excited and reset for termination. Conclusion Low-voltage multiple-shock therapy terminates AFl and AF with different mechanisms and thresholds based on spatiotemporal characteristics of the arrhythmias.

KW - Antitachycardia pacing

KW - Atrial fibrillation

KW - Atrial flutter

KW - Defibrillation

KW - Optical mapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650634410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650634410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.018

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.10.018

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 101

EP - 108

JO - Heart Rhythm

JF - Heart Rhythm

SN - 1547-5271

IS - 1

ER -