Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation

Ben A. Rich

doi:10.1017/S0963180111000478

Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation

Ben A. Rich

General Medicine, Geriatrics, and Bioethics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Until quite recently bioethicists have had little of depth and probity to say about the duty of healthcare professionals in general and physicians in particular to relieve pain and suffering associated with disease and/or its treatment.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	30-39
Number of pages	10
Journal	Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Volume	21
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180111000478
State	Published - Jan 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health Policy
Health(social science)
Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Access to Document

10.1017/S0963180111000478

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Rich, B. A. (2012). Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180111000478

@article{6eeab03f0e6c420082a5081a0cb9853c,

title = "Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation",

abstract = "Until quite recently bioethicists have had little of depth and probity to say about the duty of healthcare professionals in general and physicians in particular to relieve pain and suffering associated with disease and/or its treatment.",

author = "Rich, {Ben A.}",

year = "2012",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1017/S0963180111000478",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "21",

pages = "30--39",

journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",

issn = "0963-1801",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Terminal suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation

AU - Rich, Ben A.

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Until quite recently bioethicists have had little of depth and probity to say about the duty of healthcare professionals in general and physicians in particular to relieve pain and suffering associated with disease and/or its treatment.

AB - Until quite recently bioethicists have had little of depth and probity to say about the duty of healthcare professionals in general and physicians in particular to relieve pain and suffering associated with disease and/or its treatment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84055211909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84055211909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963180111000478

DO - 10.1017/S0963180111000478

M3 - Article

C2 - 22152456

AN - SCOPUS:84055211909

VL - 21

SP - 30

EP - 39

JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

SN - 0963-1801

IS - 1

ER -