Temporomandibular joint: Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy

P. L. Westesson, Richard W Katzberg, R. H. Tallents, R. E. Sanchez-Woodworth, S. A. Svensson, M. A. Espeland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

109 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been systematically evaluated. We obtained multiple 3-mm-thick sagittal and coronal MR images of 15 fresh TMJ autopsy specimens and compared the MR images findings with observations in corresponding sagittal cryosections. MR imaging correctly delineated the position of the disk in 11 (73%) joints and incorrectly delineated it in four (27%) joints. Disk configuration was depicted accurately in nine (60%) joints, inaccurately in five (33%), and was not visible in one (7%). Errors observed with sagittal MR images were correlated with mediolateral alterations of disk position. These abnormalities were depicted in coronary images, however. Osseous anatomy was correctly assessed in nine joints (60%). MR imaging demonstrated the margin between the disk and its attachments, which is not possible by arthrography. MR imaging is an acceptable alternative to other imaging modalities for assessing soft and hard tissues of the TMJ.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)59-64
Number of pages6
JournalRadiology
Volume164
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Temporomandibular Joint
Anatomy
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Joints
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Arthrography
Autopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Westesson, P. L., Katzberg, R. W., Tallents, R. H., Sanchez-Woodworth, R. E., Svensson, S. A., & Espeland, M. A. (1987). Temporomandibular joint: Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy. Radiology, 164(1), 59-64.

Temporomandibular joint : Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy. / Westesson, P. L.; Katzberg, Richard W; Tallents, R. H.; Sanchez-Woodworth, R. E.; Svensson, S. A.; Espeland, M. A.

In: Radiology, Vol. 164, No. 1, 1987, p. 59-64.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Westesson, PL, Katzberg, RW, Tallents, RH, Sanchez-Woodworth, RE, Svensson, SA & Espeland, MA 1987, 'Temporomandibular joint: Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy', Radiology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 59-64.
Westesson PL, Katzberg RW, Tallents RH, Sanchez-Woodworth RE, Svensson SA, Espeland MA. Temporomandibular joint: Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy. Radiology. 1987;164(1):59-64.
Westesson, P. L. ; Katzberg, Richard W ; Tallents, R. H. ; Sanchez-Woodworth, R. E. ; Svensson, S. A. ; Espeland, M. A. / Temporomandibular joint : Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy. In: Radiology. 1987 ; Vol. 164, No. 1. pp. 59-64.
@article{da2ec632f7294ea8aefcc94936d0ee7e,
title = "Temporomandibular joint: Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy",
abstract = "The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been systematically evaluated. We obtained multiple 3-mm-thick sagittal and coronal MR images of 15 fresh TMJ autopsy specimens and compared the MR images findings with observations in corresponding sagittal cryosections. MR imaging correctly delineated the position of the disk in 11 (73{\%}) joints and incorrectly delineated it in four (27{\%}) joints. Disk configuration was depicted accurately in nine (60{\%}) joints, inaccurately in five (33{\%}), and was not visible in one (7{\%}). Errors observed with sagittal MR images were correlated with mediolateral alterations of disk position. These abnormalities were depicted in coronary images, however. Osseous anatomy was correctly assessed in nine joints (60{\%}). MR imaging demonstrated the margin between the disk and its attachments, which is not possible by arthrography. MR imaging is an acceptable alternative to other imaging modalities for assessing soft and hard tissues of the TMJ.",
author = "Westesson, {P. L.} and Katzberg, {Richard W} and Tallents, {R. H.} and Sanchez-Woodworth, {R. E.} and Svensson, {S. A.} and Espeland, {M. A.}",
year = "1987",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "164",
pages = "59--64",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Temporomandibular joint

T2 - Comparison of MR images with cryosectional anatomy

AU - Westesson, P. L.

AU - Katzberg, Richard W

AU - Tallents, R. H.

AU - Sanchez-Woodworth, R. E.

AU - Svensson, S. A.

AU - Espeland, M. A.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been systematically evaluated. We obtained multiple 3-mm-thick sagittal and coronal MR images of 15 fresh TMJ autopsy specimens and compared the MR images findings with observations in corresponding sagittal cryosections. MR imaging correctly delineated the position of the disk in 11 (73%) joints and incorrectly delineated it in four (27%) joints. Disk configuration was depicted accurately in nine (60%) joints, inaccurately in five (33%), and was not visible in one (7%). Errors observed with sagittal MR images were correlated with mediolateral alterations of disk position. These abnormalities were depicted in coronary images, however. Osseous anatomy was correctly assessed in nine joints (60%). MR imaging demonstrated the margin between the disk and its attachments, which is not possible by arthrography. MR imaging is an acceptable alternative to other imaging modalities for assessing soft and hard tissues of the TMJ.

AB - The accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) has not been systematically evaluated. We obtained multiple 3-mm-thick sagittal and coronal MR images of 15 fresh TMJ autopsy specimens and compared the MR images findings with observations in corresponding sagittal cryosections. MR imaging correctly delineated the position of the disk in 11 (73%) joints and incorrectly delineated it in four (27%) joints. Disk configuration was depicted accurately in nine (60%) joints, inaccurately in five (33%), and was not visible in one (7%). Errors observed with sagittal MR images were correlated with mediolateral alterations of disk position. These abnormalities were depicted in coronary images, however. Osseous anatomy was correctly assessed in nine joints (60%). MR imaging demonstrated the margin between the disk and its attachments, which is not possible by arthrography. MR imaging is an acceptable alternative to other imaging modalities for assessing soft and hard tissues of the TMJ.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023177652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023177652&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3588927

AN - SCOPUS:0023177652

VL - 164

SP - 59

EP - 64

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 1

ER -