Abstract
Telemedicine has been shown to improve rural patient outcomes in two randomized controlled trials, to increase access to many patients, to serve underserved minorities, and to train primary care providers. Yet, programs are dwindling even after successful grants due to inadequate reimbursement. Studies have been thoroughly done to gauge the payor status of potential rural telemedicine patients, as the "floodgates" are not generally open to all-including those who cannot pay-in typical grants. Or the population of one community may not be representative of others. This study is part of a grant that explored the use of telemedicine for rural service delivery, attempted to get a clear snapshot of whom would be served if all were invited (paying or not), and to understand issues with the reimbursement systems. This article (1) examines the receipts of reimbursement and insurance coverage during the 1-year grant period by determining actual versus projected reimbursements, (2) identifies what payor(s) typical patients use, and (3) identifies problems and barriers for future study. Other administrative issues pertinent to telemedicine and costs are briefly discussed (eg, no-show rates, staffing, scheduling).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 85-94 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Psychiatric Clinics of North America |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2008 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Cite this
Telepsychiatry Reduces Geographic Physician Disparity in Rural Settings, But Is It Financially Feasible Because of Reimbursement? / Hilty, Donald M.; Cobb, Hattie C.; Neufeld, Jonathan D.; Bourgeois, James A.; Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay.
In: Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 31, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 85-94.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Telepsychiatry Reduces Geographic Physician Disparity in Rural Settings, But Is It Financially Feasible Because of Reimbursement?
AU - Hilty, Donald M.
AU - Cobb, Hattie C.
AU - Neufeld, Jonathan D.
AU - Bourgeois, James A.
AU - Yellowlees, Peter Mackinlay
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - Telemedicine has been shown to improve rural patient outcomes in two randomized controlled trials, to increase access to many patients, to serve underserved minorities, and to train primary care providers. Yet, programs are dwindling even after successful grants due to inadequate reimbursement. Studies have been thoroughly done to gauge the payor status of potential rural telemedicine patients, as the "floodgates" are not generally open to all-including those who cannot pay-in typical grants. Or the population of one community may not be representative of others. This study is part of a grant that explored the use of telemedicine for rural service delivery, attempted to get a clear snapshot of whom would be served if all were invited (paying or not), and to understand issues with the reimbursement systems. This article (1) examines the receipts of reimbursement and insurance coverage during the 1-year grant period by determining actual versus projected reimbursements, (2) identifies what payor(s) typical patients use, and (3) identifies problems and barriers for future study. Other administrative issues pertinent to telemedicine and costs are briefly discussed (eg, no-show rates, staffing, scheduling).
AB - Telemedicine has been shown to improve rural patient outcomes in two randomized controlled trials, to increase access to many patients, to serve underserved minorities, and to train primary care providers. Yet, programs are dwindling even after successful grants due to inadequate reimbursement. Studies have been thoroughly done to gauge the payor status of potential rural telemedicine patients, as the "floodgates" are not generally open to all-including those who cannot pay-in typical grants. Or the population of one community may not be representative of others. This study is part of a grant that explored the use of telemedicine for rural service delivery, attempted to get a clear snapshot of whom would be served if all were invited (paying or not), and to understand issues with the reimbursement systems. This article (1) examines the receipts of reimbursement and insurance coverage during the 1-year grant period by determining actual versus projected reimbursements, (2) identifies what payor(s) typical patients use, and (3) identifies problems and barriers for future study. Other administrative issues pertinent to telemedicine and costs are briefly discussed (eg, no-show rates, staffing, scheduling).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39149127343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39149127343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.psc.2007.11.010
DO - 10.1016/j.psc.2007.11.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 18295040
AN - SCOPUS:39149127343
VL - 31
SP - 85
EP - 94
JO - Psychiatric Clinics of North America
JF - Psychiatric Clinics of North America
SN - 0193-953X
IS - 1
ER -