Telephone ownership and deaf people: Implications for telephone surveys

Steven Barnett, Peter Franks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. This study was done to determine the prevalence of telephone ownership in different deaf populations and to explore its implications for telephone-based surveys. Methods. Multivariate analyses, with adjustments for sociodemographics and health status, were done of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1990 and 1991, the years in which the NHIS Hearing Supplement was administered. Results. Prelingually deafened adults were less likely than members of the general population to own a telephone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15, 0.82), whereas postlingually deafened adults were as likely as members of the general population to own one (AOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.28). Conclusions. Telephone surveys risk marginalizing prelingually deafened adults because of low telephone ownership and language barriers between the deaf and hearing communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1754-1756
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume89
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ownership
Telephone
Health Surveys
Hearing
Odds Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Interviews
Population
Communication Barriers
Health Status
Multivariate Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Telephone ownership and deaf people : Implications for telephone surveys. / Barnett, Steven; Franks, Peter.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 89, No. 11, 11.1999, p. 1754-1756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ebac6474200d410f8ab5199857f21102,
title = "Telephone ownership and deaf people: Implications for telephone surveys",
abstract = "Objectives. This study was done to determine the prevalence of telephone ownership in different deaf populations and to explore its implications for telephone-based surveys. Methods. Multivariate analyses, with adjustments for sociodemographics and health status, were done of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1990 and 1991, the years in which the NHIS Hearing Supplement was administered. Results. Prelingually deafened adults were less likely than members of the general population to own a telephone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 0.15, 0.82), whereas postlingually deafened adults were as likely as members of the general population to own one (AOR = 1.00; 95{\%} CI = 0.78, 1.28). Conclusions. Telephone surveys risk marginalizing prelingually deafened adults because of low telephone ownership and language barriers between the deaf and hearing communities.",
author = "Steven Barnett and Peter Franks",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "1754--1756",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telephone ownership and deaf people

T2 - Implications for telephone surveys

AU - Barnett, Steven

AU - Franks, Peter

PY - 1999/11

Y1 - 1999/11

N2 - Objectives. This study was done to determine the prevalence of telephone ownership in different deaf populations and to explore its implications for telephone-based surveys. Methods. Multivariate analyses, with adjustments for sociodemographics and health status, were done of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1990 and 1991, the years in which the NHIS Hearing Supplement was administered. Results. Prelingually deafened adults were less likely than members of the general population to own a telephone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15, 0.82), whereas postlingually deafened adults were as likely as members of the general population to own one (AOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.28). Conclusions. Telephone surveys risk marginalizing prelingually deafened adults because of low telephone ownership and language barriers between the deaf and hearing communities.

AB - Objectives. This study was done to determine the prevalence of telephone ownership in different deaf populations and to explore its implications for telephone-based surveys. Methods. Multivariate analyses, with adjustments for sociodemographics and health status, were done of National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 1990 and 1991, the years in which the NHIS Hearing Supplement was administered. Results. Prelingually deafened adults were less likely than members of the general population to own a telephone (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15, 0.82), whereas postlingually deafened adults were as likely as members of the general population to own one (AOR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.78, 1.28). Conclusions. Telephone surveys risk marginalizing prelingually deafened adults because of low telephone ownership and language barriers between the deaf and hearing communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032707201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032707201&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10553404

AN - SCOPUS:0032707201

VL - 89

SP - 1754

EP - 1756

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 11

ER -