Technology status evaluation: Device reprocessing companies

D. L. Carr-Locke, M. I. Conn, D. O. Faigel, K. Laing, J. W. Leung, M. R. Mills, D. B. Nelson, P. R. Tarnasky, I. Waxman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Reprocessing of endoscopic accessories has been carried out in many medical facilities, however, there is no information comparing in-house reprocessing with the use of an outside reprocessing company. Although shifting the reprocessing to a reprocessing company reduces the workload, it does not relieve the user/medical facility of its responsibility. In the absence of an industry standard, consistent regulatory enforcement, and established quality control criteria, the reprocessing service should be selected carefully and subsequently monitored. The reprocessing of 'single- use' items remains controversial and the position of the FDA is awaited. Further studies evaluating the safety and cost effectiveness of reprocessing of 'single-use' items are necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)717-722
Number of pages6
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume48
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1998

Fingerprint

Workload
Quality Control
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Industry
Technology
Safety
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Carr-Locke, D. L., Conn, M. I., Faigel, D. O., Laing, K., Leung, J. W., Mills, M. R., ... Waxman, I. (1998). Technology status evaluation: Device reprocessing companies. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 48(6), 717-722.

Technology status evaluation : Device reprocessing companies. / Carr-Locke, D. L.; Conn, M. I.; Faigel, D. O.; Laing, K.; Leung, J. W.; Mills, M. R.; Nelson, D. B.; Tarnasky, P. R.; Waxman, I.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 48, No. 6, 1998, p. 717-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carr-Locke, DL, Conn, MI, Faigel, DO, Laing, K, Leung, JW, Mills, MR, Nelson, DB, Tarnasky, PR & Waxman, I 1998, 'Technology status evaluation: Device reprocessing companies', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 717-722.
Carr-Locke DL, Conn MI, Faigel DO, Laing K, Leung JW, Mills MR et al. Technology status evaluation: Device reprocessing companies. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1998;48(6):717-722.
Carr-Locke, D. L. ; Conn, M. I. ; Faigel, D. O. ; Laing, K. ; Leung, J. W. ; Mills, M. R. ; Nelson, D. B. ; Tarnasky, P. R. ; Waxman, I. / Technology status evaluation : Device reprocessing companies. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1998 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 717-722.
@article{433ff10a60774d1a8761875f9d535687,
title = "Technology status evaluation: Device reprocessing companies",
abstract = "Reprocessing of endoscopic accessories has been carried out in many medical facilities, however, there is no information comparing in-house reprocessing with the use of an outside reprocessing company. Although shifting the reprocessing to a reprocessing company reduces the workload, it does not relieve the user/medical facility of its responsibility. In the absence of an industry standard, consistent regulatory enforcement, and established quality control criteria, the reprocessing service should be selected carefully and subsequently monitored. The reprocessing of 'single- use' items remains controversial and the position of the FDA is awaited. Further studies evaluating the safety and cost effectiveness of reprocessing of 'single-use' items are necessary.",
author = "Carr-Locke, {D. L.} and Conn, {M. I.} and Faigel, {D. O.} and K. Laing and Leung, {J. W.} and Mills, {M. R.} and Nelson, {D. B.} and Tarnasky, {P. R.} and I. Waxman",
year = "1998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "717--722",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology status evaluation

T2 - Device reprocessing companies

AU - Carr-Locke, D. L.

AU - Conn, M. I.

AU - Faigel, D. O.

AU - Laing, K.

AU - Leung, J. W.

AU - Mills, M. R.

AU - Nelson, D. B.

AU - Tarnasky, P. R.

AU - Waxman, I.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Reprocessing of endoscopic accessories has been carried out in many medical facilities, however, there is no information comparing in-house reprocessing with the use of an outside reprocessing company. Although shifting the reprocessing to a reprocessing company reduces the workload, it does not relieve the user/medical facility of its responsibility. In the absence of an industry standard, consistent regulatory enforcement, and established quality control criteria, the reprocessing service should be selected carefully and subsequently monitored. The reprocessing of 'single- use' items remains controversial and the position of the FDA is awaited. Further studies evaluating the safety and cost effectiveness of reprocessing of 'single-use' items are necessary.

AB - Reprocessing of endoscopic accessories has been carried out in many medical facilities, however, there is no information comparing in-house reprocessing with the use of an outside reprocessing company. Although shifting the reprocessing to a reprocessing company reduces the workload, it does not relieve the user/medical facility of its responsibility. In the absence of an industry standard, consistent regulatory enforcement, and established quality control criteria, the reprocessing service should be selected carefully and subsequently monitored. The reprocessing of 'single- use' items remains controversial and the position of the FDA is awaited. Further studies evaluating the safety and cost effectiveness of reprocessing of 'single-use' items are necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031678481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031678481&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9852484

AN - SCOPUS:0031678481

VL - 48

SP - 717

EP - 722

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -