Techniques of reporting disease outbreak investigations.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective communication of results and recommendations among veterinarians and between veterinarians and clients is an essential but often neglected component of an outbreak investigation. Although results have been traditionally related verbally, written reports are essential to minimize possible misunderstandings and provide a reference base for future herd health visits or epidemiologic investigations. A uniform reporting scheme for disease investigations by field veterinarians does not exist, but such a system would be desirable to allow comparisons of disease rates and productivity data among herds. In this article, a report format and style is outlined to facilitate exchange of data among veterinarians and clients. Reports to other veterinarians should include the following elements: history, objectives, methodology, results, causes/hypotheses, financial impact, and recommendations. For a client, a report should emphasize causes, recommendations, and the cost of measures to control the condition. Report planning, writing, and editing are facilitated by use of word-processing software on a microcomputer. Style will vary considerably according to the writer's objectives and individual preference, but headings, subheadings, graphs, and tables can be used to increase the visual appeal and readability of a report. The level of technicality should be appropriate for the audience. Sentences should be well constructed and precise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-125
Number of pages17
JournalThe Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

outbreak investigation
Veterinarians
Disease Outbreaks
veterinarians
readability
Word Processing
methodology
herd health
microcomputers
Microcomputers
communication (human)
economic impact
Software
planning
History
herds
Communication
Costs and Cost Analysis
history
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Animals

Cite this

Techniques of reporting disease outbreak investigations. / Gardner, Ian.

In: The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.01.1988, p. 109-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ea1841197b44bcd903a178a06d0ce55,
title = "Techniques of reporting disease outbreak investigations.",
abstract = "Effective communication of results and recommendations among veterinarians and between veterinarians and clients is an essential but often neglected component of an outbreak investigation. Although results have been traditionally related verbally, written reports are essential to minimize possible misunderstandings and provide a reference base for future herd health visits or epidemiologic investigations. A uniform reporting scheme for disease investigations by field veterinarians does not exist, but such a system would be desirable to allow comparisons of disease rates and productivity data among herds. In this article, a report format and style is outlined to facilitate exchange of data among veterinarians and clients. Reports to other veterinarians should include the following elements: history, objectives, methodology, results, causes/hypotheses, financial impact, and recommendations. For a client, a report should emphasize causes, recommendations, and the cost of measures to control the condition. Report planning, writing, and editing are facilitated by use of word-processing software on a microcomputer. Style will vary considerably according to the writer's objectives and individual preference, but headings, subheadings, graphs, and tables can be used to increase the visual appeal and readability of a report. The level of technicality should be appropriate for the audience. Sentences should be well constructed and precise.",
author = "Ian Gardner",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0749-0720(15)31103-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "109--125",
journal = "Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice",
issn = "0749-0720",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Techniques of reporting disease outbreak investigations.

AU - Gardner, Ian

PY - 1988/1/1

Y1 - 1988/1/1

N2 - Effective communication of results and recommendations among veterinarians and between veterinarians and clients is an essential but often neglected component of an outbreak investigation. Although results have been traditionally related verbally, written reports are essential to minimize possible misunderstandings and provide a reference base for future herd health visits or epidemiologic investigations. A uniform reporting scheme for disease investigations by field veterinarians does not exist, but such a system would be desirable to allow comparisons of disease rates and productivity data among herds. In this article, a report format and style is outlined to facilitate exchange of data among veterinarians and clients. Reports to other veterinarians should include the following elements: history, objectives, methodology, results, causes/hypotheses, financial impact, and recommendations. For a client, a report should emphasize causes, recommendations, and the cost of measures to control the condition. Report planning, writing, and editing are facilitated by use of word-processing software on a microcomputer. Style will vary considerably according to the writer's objectives and individual preference, but headings, subheadings, graphs, and tables can be used to increase the visual appeal and readability of a report. The level of technicality should be appropriate for the audience. Sentences should be well constructed and precise.

AB - Effective communication of results and recommendations among veterinarians and between veterinarians and clients is an essential but often neglected component of an outbreak investigation. Although results have been traditionally related verbally, written reports are essential to minimize possible misunderstandings and provide a reference base for future herd health visits or epidemiologic investigations. A uniform reporting scheme for disease investigations by field veterinarians does not exist, but such a system would be desirable to allow comparisons of disease rates and productivity data among herds. In this article, a report format and style is outlined to facilitate exchange of data among veterinarians and clients. Reports to other veterinarians should include the following elements: history, objectives, methodology, results, causes/hypotheses, financial impact, and recommendations. For a client, a report should emphasize causes, recommendations, and the cost of measures to control the condition. Report planning, writing, and editing are facilitated by use of word-processing software on a microcomputer. Style will vary considerably according to the writer's objectives and individual preference, but headings, subheadings, graphs, and tables can be used to increase the visual appeal and readability of a report. The level of technicality should be appropriate for the audience. Sentences should be well constructed and precise.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023974004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023974004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)31103-8

DO - 10.1016/S0749-0720(15)31103-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 3259453

AN - SCOPUS:0023974004

VL - 4

SP - 109

EP - 125

JO - Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice

JF - Veterinary Clinics of North America - Food Animal Practice

SN - 0749-0720

IS - 1

ER -