Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness

N. Clay Mann, Richard J. Mullins, Ellen J. MacKenzie, Gregory Jurkovich, Charles N. Mock

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

234 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Provide a systematic review of the published literature assessing the affect of trauma center/system implementation on patient outcomes. Data Sources: A bibliographic search of MEDLINE (1966 - May of 1998), HealthSTAR (1995 - May of 1998), and CINAHL (1982 - May of 1998). Additional manuscripts were identified in the references of reviewed manuscripts. Literature was limited to English language reports on trauma systems in the United States and Canada. Study Selection: Initial inclusion criteria were based on methodologic criteria (i.e., a comparative [controlled] study). Authors independently assessed the strength of evidence demonstrated by each article. Data Extraction: Included articles were classified into three groups based on study design: panel review studies, trauma registry comparison studies, and population-based studies. Key demographic, sampling frame, study design, and outcome variables were tabulated for each included study. Potential sources of bias were also identified and tabled. Data Synthesis: A total of 12, 11, and 17 studies were incorporated into individual evidence tables for panel review, registry comparison, and population-based studies, respectively. Included studies rely on weak evidence (Class III) to assess the impact of trauma systems on patient care and outcome. Conclusions: To date, studies assessing trauma system efficacy rely on hospital deaths as the primary indicator of effectiveness. Future research should use more sophisticated study designs (Class II) and expand available outcome measures to assess the entire continuum of care, including prehospital, rehabilitation outcomes, and lone-term quality of life.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume47
Issue number3 SUPPL. 1
StatePublished - Dec 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
Wounds and Injuries
Registries
Sampling Studies
Continuity of Patient Care
Trauma Centers
Information Storage and Retrieval
MEDLINE
Population
Canada
Patient Care
Language
Quality of Life
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Evidence report
  • Mortality
  • Trauma systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness. / Mann, N. Clay; Mullins, Richard J.; MacKenzie, Ellen J.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Mock, Charles N.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 47, No. 3 SUPPL. 1, 01.12.1999.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Mann, N. Clay ; Mullins, Richard J. ; MacKenzie, Ellen J. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Mock, Charles N. / Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 47, No. 3 SUPPL. 1.
@article{bfcc0f67b7ce4b079943a193016e833b,
title = "Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness",
abstract = "Objective: Provide a systematic review of the published literature assessing the affect of trauma center/system implementation on patient outcomes. Data Sources: A bibliographic search of MEDLINE (1966 - May of 1998), HealthSTAR (1995 - May of 1998), and CINAHL (1982 - May of 1998). Additional manuscripts were identified in the references of reviewed manuscripts. Literature was limited to English language reports on trauma systems in the United States and Canada. Study Selection: Initial inclusion criteria were based on methodologic criteria (i.e., a comparative [controlled] study). Authors independently assessed the strength of evidence demonstrated by each article. Data Extraction: Included articles were classified into three groups based on study design: panel review studies, trauma registry comparison studies, and population-based studies. Key demographic, sampling frame, study design, and outcome variables were tabulated for each included study. Potential sources of bias were also identified and tabled. Data Synthesis: A total of 12, 11, and 17 studies were incorporated into individual evidence tables for panel review, registry comparison, and population-based studies, respectively. Included studies rely on weak evidence (Class III) to assess the impact of trauma systems on patient care and outcome. Conclusions: To date, studies assessing trauma system efficacy rely on hospital deaths as the primary indicator of effectiveness. Future research should use more sophisticated study designs (Class II) and expand available outcome measures to assess the entire continuum of care, including prehospital, rehabilitation outcomes, and lone-term quality of life.",
keywords = "Evidence report, Mortality, Trauma systems",
author = "Mann, {N. Clay} and Mullins, {Richard J.} and MacKenzie, {Ellen J.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Mock, {Charles N.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3 SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness

AU - Mann, N. Clay

AU - Mullins, Richard J.

AU - MacKenzie, Ellen J.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Mock, Charles N.

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - Objective: Provide a systematic review of the published literature assessing the affect of trauma center/system implementation on patient outcomes. Data Sources: A bibliographic search of MEDLINE (1966 - May of 1998), HealthSTAR (1995 - May of 1998), and CINAHL (1982 - May of 1998). Additional manuscripts were identified in the references of reviewed manuscripts. Literature was limited to English language reports on trauma systems in the United States and Canada. Study Selection: Initial inclusion criteria were based on methodologic criteria (i.e., a comparative [controlled] study). Authors independently assessed the strength of evidence demonstrated by each article. Data Extraction: Included articles were classified into three groups based on study design: panel review studies, trauma registry comparison studies, and population-based studies. Key demographic, sampling frame, study design, and outcome variables were tabulated for each included study. Potential sources of bias were also identified and tabled. Data Synthesis: A total of 12, 11, and 17 studies were incorporated into individual evidence tables for panel review, registry comparison, and population-based studies, respectively. Included studies rely on weak evidence (Class III) to assess the impact of trauma systems on patient care and outcome. Conclusions: To date, studies assessing trauma system efficacy rely on hospital deaths as the primary indicator of effectiveness. Future research should use more sophisticated study designs (Class II) and expand available outcome measures to assess the entire continuum of care, including prehospital, rehabilitation outcomes, and lone-term quality of life.

AB - Objective: Provide a systematic review of the published literature assessing the affect of trauma center/system implementation on patient outcomes. Data Sources: A bibliographic search of MEDLINE (1966 - May of 1998), HealthSTAR (1995 - May of 1998), and CINAHL (1982 - May of 1998). Additional manuscripts were identified in the references of reviewed manuscripts. Literature was limited to English language reports on trauma systems in the United States and Canada. Study Selection: Initial inclusion criteria were based on methodologic criteria (i.e., a comparative [controlled] study). Authors independently assessed the strength of evidence demonstrated by each article. Data Extraction: Included articles were classified into three groups based on study design: panel review studies, trauma registry comparison studies, and population-based studies. Key demographic, sampling frame, study design, and outcome variables were tabulated for each included study. Potential sources of bias were also identified and tabled. Data Synthesis: A total of 12, 11, and 17 studies were incorporated into individual evidence tables for panel review, registry comparison, and population-based studies, respectively. Included studies rely on weak evidence (Class III) to assess the impact of trauma systems on patient care and outcome. Conclusions: To date, studies assessing trauma system efficacy rely on hospital deaths as the primary indicator of effectiveness. Future research should use more sophisticated study designs (Class II) and expand available outcome measures to assess the entire continuum of care, including prehospital, rehabilitation outcomes, and lone-term quality of life.

KW - Evidence report

KW - Mortality

KW - Trauma systems

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032829150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032829150&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 10496607

AN - SCOPUS:0032829150

VL - 47

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 3 SUPPL. 1

ER -