Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery

Glenn C Yiu, Kyle V. Marra, Sushant Wagley, Sheela Krishnan, Harpal Sandhu, Kyle Kovacs, Mark Kuperwaser, Jorge G. Arroyo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation versus ERM peeling alone. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomised comparative case series study was conducted of 81 eyes from 79 patients who underwent ERM peeling at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2010. Eyes that underwent combined surgery for ERM and cataracts (group 1) were compared with those that had ERM peeling alone (group 2) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, postoperative central macular thickness (CMT) as measured on optical coherence tomography, and rates of complications, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), ERM recurrence and need for reoperation. Results: Mean logMAR visual acuity improved significantly in both groups at 6 months (p<0.001) and 1 year (p<0.001) after surgery. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in visual acuity improvement at 6 months (p=0.108) or 1 year (p=0.094). Mean CMT of both groups also significantly decreased after surgery (p=0.002), with no statistical difference in CMT reduction between the two groups, but a trend toward less CMT reduction in group 1 (p=0.061). The rates of complications, including IOP elevation, ERM recurrence and frequency of reoperation, were similar in the two groups, with non-statistical trends toward greater ERM recurrence (p=0.084) and need for reoperation (p=0.096) in those that had combined surgery. Conclusions: Combined surgery for ERMs and cataracts may potentially be as effective as membrane peeling alone with respect to visual and anatomical outcomes. Further studies are necessary to determine if there may be greater ERM recurrence or need for reoperation after combined surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1197-1201
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume97
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epiretinal Membrane
Cataract
Reoperation
Visual Acuity
Recurrence
Intraocular Pressure
Intraocular Lens Implantation
Phacoemulsification
Optical Coherence Tomography
Israel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery. / Yiu, Glenn C; Marra, Kyle V.; Wagley, Sushant; Krishnan, Sheela; Sandhu, Harpal; Kovacs, Kyle; Kuperwaser, Mark; Arroyo, Jorge G.

In: British Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 97, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 1197-1201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yiu, GC, Marra, KV, Wagley, S, Krishnan, S, Sandhu, H, Kovacs, K, Kuperwaser, M & Arroyo, JG 2013, 'Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery', British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 97, no. 9, pp. 1197-1201. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303189
Yiu, Glenn C ; Marra, Kyle V. ; Wagley, Sushant ; Krishnan, Sheela ; Sandhu, Harpal ; Kovacs, Kyle ; Kuperwaser, Mark ; Arroyo, Jorge G. / Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery. In: British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013 ; Vol. 97, No. 9. pp. 1197-1201.
@article{1df26752504d435081a51afd90c18ee2,
title = "Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery",
abstract = "Objective: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation versus ERM peeling alone. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomised comparative case series study was conducted of 81 eyes from 79 patients who underwent ERM peeling at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2010. Eyes that underwent combined surgery for ERM and cataracts (group 1) were compared with those that had ERM peeling alone (group 2) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, postoperative central macular thickness (CMT) as measured on optical coherence tomography, and rates of complications, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), ERM recurrence and need for reoperation. Results: Mean logMAR visual acuity improved significantly in both groups at 6 months (p<0.001) and 1 year (p<0.001) after surgery. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in visual acuity improvement at 6 months (p=0.108) or 1 year (p=0.094). Mean CMT of both groups also significantly decreased after surgery (p=0.002), with no statistical difference in CMT reduction between the two groups, but a trend toward less CMT reduction in group 1 (p=0.061). The rates of complications, including IOP elevation, ERM recurrence and frequency of reoperation, were similar in the two groups, with non-statistical trends toward greater ERM recurrence (p=0.084) and need for reoperation (p=0.096) in those that had combined surgery. Conclusions: Combined surgery for ERMs and cataracts may potentially be as effective as membrane peeling alone with respect to visual and anatomical outcomes. Further studies are necessary to determine if there may be greater ERM recurrence or need for reoperation after combined surgery.",
author = "Yiu, {Glenn C} and Marra, {Kyle V.} and Sushant Wagley and Sheela Krishnan and Harpal Sandhu and Kyle Kovacs and Mark Kuperwaser and Arroyo, {Jorge G.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303189",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "1197--1201",
journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0007-1161",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical outcomes after epiretinal membrane peeling combined with cataract surgery

AU - Yiu, Glenn C

AU - Marra, Kyle V.

AU - Wagley, Sushant

AU - Krishnan, Sheela

AU - Sandhu, Harpal

AU - Kovacs, Kyle

AU - Kuperwaser, Mark

AU - Arroyo, Jorge G.

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Objective: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation versus ERM peeling alone. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomised comparative case series study was conducted of 81 eyes from 79 patients who underwent ERM peeling at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2010. Eyes that underwent combined surgery for ERM and cataracts (group 1) were compared with those that had ERM peeling alone (group 2) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, postoperative central macular thickness (CMT) as measured on optical coherence tomography, and rates of complications, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), ERM recurrence and need for reoperation. Results: Mean logMAR visual acuity improved significantly in both groups at 6 months (p<0.001) and 1 year (p<0.001) after surgery. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in visual acuity improvement at 6 months (p=0.108) or 1 year (p=0.094). Mean CMT of both groups also significantly decreased after surgery (p=0.002), with no statistical difference in CMT reduction between the two groups, but a trend toward less CMT reduction in group 1 (p=0.061). The rates of complications, including IOP elevation, ERM recurrence and frequency of reoperation, were similar in the two groups, with non-statistical trends toward greater ERM recurrence (p=0.084) and need for reoperation (p=0.096) in those that had combined surgery. Conclusions: Combined surgery for ERMs and cataracts may potentially be as effective as membrane peeling alone with respect to visual and anatomical outcomes. Further studies are necessary to determine if there may be greater ERM recurrence or need for reoperation after combined surgery.

AB - Objective: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation versus ERM peeling alone. Methods: A retrospective, non-randomised comparative case series study was conducted of 81 eyes from 79 patients who underwent ERM peeling at the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2010. Eyes that underwent combined surgery for ERM and cataracts (group 1) were compared with those that had ERM peeling alone (group 2) with respect to best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, postoperative central macular thickness (CMT) as measured on optical coherence tomography, and rates of complications, including elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), ERM recurrence and need for reoperation. Results: Mean logMAR visual acuity improved significantly in both groups at 6 months (p<0.001) and 1 year (p<0.001) after surgery. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in visual acuity improvement at 6 months (p=0.108) or 1 year (p=0.094). Mean CMT of both groups also significantly decreased after surgery (p=0.002), with no statistical difference in CMT reduction between the two groups, but a trend toward less CMT reduction in group 1 (p=0.061). The rates of complications, including IOP elevation, ERM recurrence and frequency of reoperation, were similar in the two groups, with non-statistical trends toward greater ERM recurrence (p=0.084) and need for reoperation (p=0.096) in those that had combined surgery. Conclusions: Combined surgery for ERMs and cataracts may potentially be as effective as membrane peeling alone with respect to visual and anatomical outcomes. Further studies are necessary to determine if there may be greater ERM recurrence or need for reoperation after combined surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882260321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882260321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303189

DO - 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303189

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 1197

EP - 1201

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

IS - 9

ER -