Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures: An evaluation of evolving treatment methods

Kenneth J. Hunt, Sohrab Gollogly, R Randall

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The surgical techniques for the fixation of pathologic fractures continue to evolve. The present study examines clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of newer generation interlocked intramedullary nails compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws for pathologic fractures in long bones. Fifty operative procedures performed on 37 patients by five community orthopaedic surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. The operative procedures were separated into two groups based upon the method of fracture fixation; the groups were compared for differences in hardware or fixation failure. The use of intramedullary devices was associated with a significantly lower number of hardware or fixation failures (p < 0.02). This data, in addition to several additional advantages of indirect reduction and intramedullary fixation of pathologic fractures, supports this method of fracture care over open reduction and internal fixation in appropriate cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)77-82
Number of pages6
JournalBulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases
Volume63
Issue number3-4
StatePublished - Jul 12 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spontaneous Fractures
Operative Surgical Procedures
Fracture Fixation
Nails
Therapeutics
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures : An evaluation of evolving treatment methods. / Hunt, Kenneth J.; Gollogly, Sohrab; Randall, R.

In: Bulletin: Hospital for Joint Diseases, Vol. 63, No. 3-4, 12.07.2006, p. 77-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{3140fab9bcf4433da335c955b2dd9a12,
title = "Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures: An evaluation of evolving treatment methods",
abstract = "The surgical techniques for the fixation of pathologic fractures continue to evolve. The present study examines clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of newer generation interlocked intramedullary nails compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws for pathologic fractures in long bones. Fifty operative procedures performed on 37 patients by five community orthopaedic surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. The operative procedures were separated into two groups based upon the method of fracture fixation; the groups were compared for differences in hardware or fixation failure. The use of intramedullary devices was associated with a significantly lower number of hardware or fixation failures (p < 0.02). This data, in addition to several additional advantages of indirect reduction and intramedullary fixation of pathologic fractures, supports this method of fracture care over open reduction and internal fixation in appropriate cases.",
author = "Hunt, {Kenneth J.} and Sohrab Gollogly and R Randall",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
day = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "63",
pages = "77--82",
journal = "Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)",
issn = "2328-4633",
publisher = "J.Michael Ryan Publishing Inc.",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical fixation of pathologic fractures

T2 - An evaluation of evolving treatment methods

AU - Hunt, Kenneth J.

AU - Gollogly, Sohrab

AU - Randall, R

PY - 2006/7/12

Y1 - 2006/7/12

N2 - The surgical techniques for the fixation of pathologic fractures continue to evolve. The present study examines clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of newer generation interlocked intramedullary nails compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws for pathologic fractures in long bones. Fifty operative procedures performed on 37 patients by five community orthopaedic surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. The operative procedures were separated into two groups based upon the method of fracture fixation; the groups were compared for differences in hardware or fixation failure. The use of intramedullary devices was associated with a significantly lower number of hardware or fixation failures (p < 0.02). This data, in addition to several additional advantages of indirect reduction and intramedullary fixation of pathologic fractures, supports this method of fracture care over open reduction and internal fixation in appropriate cases.

AB - The surgical techniques for the fixation of pathologic fractures continue to evolve. The present study examines clinical outcomes and complications associated with the use of newer generation interlocked intramedullary nails compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plates and screws for pathologic fractures in long bones. Fifty operative procedures performed on 37 patients by five community orthopaedic surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. The operative procedures were separated into two groups based upon the method of fracture fixation; the groups were compared for differences in hardware or fixation failure. The use of intramedullary devices was associated with a significantly lower number of hardware or fixation failures (p < 0.02). This data, in addition to several additional advantages of indirect reduction and intramedullary fixation of pathologic fractures, supports this method of fracture care over open reduction and internal fixation in appropriate cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745699825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745699825&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 16878822

AN - SCOPUS:33745699825

VL - 63

SP - 77

EP - 82

JO - Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)

JF - Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Disease (2013)

SN - 2328-4633

IS - 3-4

ER -