Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation

A multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era

Christoph Troppmann, A. C. Gruessner, D. L. Dunn, D. E R Sutherland, Rainer W G Gruessner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

153 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To study significant surgical complications requiring early (≤3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision- making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications. Summary Background Data: Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date. Methods: We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54% simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22% pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37% retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation. Results: The overall relap rate was 32% (SPK, 36%; PAK, 25%; PTA, 16%; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38%), pancreas graft thrombosis (27%), and anastomotic leak (15%). Perioperative relap mortality was 9%; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57% of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80% of recipients with versus 41% without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA). Conclusions: Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)255-268
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume227
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pancreas Transplantation
Cyclosporine
Pancreas
Economics
Kidney
Transplants
Pancreatectomy
Survival Rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation : A multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era. / Troppmann, Christoph; Gruessner, A. C.; Dunn, D. L.; Sutherland, D. E R; Gruessner, Rainer W G.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 227, No. 2, 02.1998, p. 255-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{917c705bc0b14315880695e764ffeaec,
title = "Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation: A multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era",
abstract = "Objectives: To study significant surgical complications requiring early (≤3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision- making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications. Summary Background Data: Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date. Methods: We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54{\%} simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22{\%} pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24{\%} pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37{\%} retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation. Results: The overall relap rate was 32{\%} (SPK, 36{\%}; PAK, 25{\%}; PTA, 16{\%}; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38{\%}), pancreas graft thrombosis (27{\%}), and anastomotic leak (15{\%}). Perioperative relap mortality was 9{\%}; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57{\%} of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80{\%} of recipients with versus 41{\%} without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA). Conclusions: Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.",
author = "Christoph Troppmann and Gruessner, {A. C.} and Dunn, {D. L.} and Sutherland, {D. E R} and Gruessner, {Rainer W G}",
year = "1998",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1097/00000658-199802000-00016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "227",
pages = "255--268",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical complications requiring early relaparotomy after pancreas transplantation

T2 - A multivariate risk factor and economic impact analysis of the cyclosporine era

AU - Troppmann, Christoph

AU - Gruessner, A. C.

AU - Dunn, D. L.

AU - Sutherland, D. E R

AU - Gruessner, Rainer W G

PY - 1998/2

Y1 - 1998/2

N2 - Objectives: To study significant surgical complications requiring early (≤3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision- making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications. Summary Background Data: Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date. Methods: We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54% simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22% pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37% retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation. Results: The overall relap rate was 32% (SPK, 36%; PAK, 25%; PTA, 16%; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38%), pancreas graft thrombosis (27%), and anastomotic leak (15%). Perioperative relap mortality was 9%; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57% of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80% of recipients with versus 41% without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA). Conclusions: Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.

AB - Objectives: To study significant surgical complications requiring early (≤3 months posttransplant) relaparotomy (relap) after pancreas transplants, and to develop clinically relevant surgical and peritransplant decision- making guidelines for preventing and managing such complications. Summary Background Data: Pancreas grafts are still associated with the highest surgical complication rate of all routinely transplanted solid organs. However, the impact of surgical complications on morbidity, hospital costs, and graft and patient survival rates has not been analyzed in detail to date. Methods: We retrospectively studied surgical complications requiring relap in 441 consecutive cadaver, bladder-drained pancreas transplants (54% simultaneous pancreas and kidney [SPK]; 22% pancreas after kidney [PAK]; 24% pancreas transplant alone [PTA]; 37% retransplant). Outcome and hospital charges were analyzed separately for recipients with versus without reoperation. Results: The overall relap rate was 32% (SPK, 36%; PAK, 25%; PTA, 16%; p = 0.04). The most common causes were intraabdominal infection and graft pancreatitis (38%), pancreas graft thrombosis (27%), and anastomotic leak (15%). Perioperative relap mortality was 9%; transplant pancreatectomy was necessary in 57% of all recipients with one or more relaps. The pancreas graft was lost in 80% of recipients with versus 41% without relap (p < 0.0001). Patient survival rates were significantly lower (p < 0.05) for recipients with versus without relap. By multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for graft loss included older donor age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (PAK), relap for infection (SPK, PAK), and relap for leak or bleeding (PAK). For death, risk factors included older recipient age (SPK, PAK), retransplant (SPK, PAK), relap for thrombosis (PAK), relap for infection or leak (SPK), and relap for bleeding (PTA). Conclusions: Posttransplant surgical complications requiring relap were frequent, resulted in a high rate of pancreas (SPK, PAK, PTA) and kidney (SPK, PAK) graft loss, and had a major economic impact (p = 0.0001). Complications were associated with substantial perioperative mortality and decreased patient survival rates. The focus must therefore shift from graft salvage to preservation of the recipient's life once a pancreas graft-related complication requiring relap occurs. Thus, the threshold for pancreatectomy should be low. In this context, acceptance of older donors and recipients must be reconsidered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031885343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031885343&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00016

DO - 10.1097/00000658-199802000-00016

M3 - Article

VL - 227

SP - 255

EP - 268

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 2

ER -