Suicide inquiry in primary care

Creating context, inquiring, and following up

Steven D. Vannoy, Tonya L Fancher, Caitlyn Meltvedt, Jürgen Unützer, Paul Duberstein, Richard L Kravitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: We wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality. RESULTS: Most suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did."). CONCLUSION: Although most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-39
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Suicide
Primary Health Care
Primary Care Physicians
Physicians
Disclosure
Antidepressive Agents
Emotions
Depression
Adjustment Disorders
Somatoform Disorders
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Vocabulary
Back Pain
Quality Improvement
Terminology
Language
Research

Keywords

  • Depression
  • Primary health care
  • Suicide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Suicide inquiry in primary care : Creating context, inquiring, and following up. / Vannoy, Steven D.; Fancher, Tonya L; Meltvedt, Caitlyn; Unützer, Jürgen; Duberstein, Paul; Kravitz, Richard L.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 33-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vannoy, Steven D. ; Fancher, Tonya L ; Meltvedt, Caitlyn ; Unützer, Jürgen ; Duberstein, Paul ; Kravitz, Richard L. / Suicide inquiry in primary care : Creating context, inquiring, and following up. In: Annals of Family Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 33-39.
@article{089d462d2f624474ba922e5b9b8f8efa,
title = "Suicide inquiry in primary care: Creating context, inquiring, and following up",
abstract = "PURPOSE: We wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53{\%} to 61{\%} of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality. RESULTS: Most suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, {"}Are you feeling like hurting yourself?{"}); (2) supportive framing (eg, {"}Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?{"}); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, {"}You're not feeling suicidal, are you?{"}). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79{\%}) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86{\%}) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, {"}I hope you would tell me if you did.{"}). CONCLUSION: Although most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.",
keywords = "Depression, Primary health care, Suicide",
author = "Vannoy, {Steven D.} and Fancher, {Tonya L} and Caitlyn Meltvedt and J{\"u}rgen Un{\"u}tzer and Paul Duberstein and Kravitz, {Richard L}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1036",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "33--39",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Suicide inquiry in primary care

T2 - Creating context, inquiring, and following up

AU - Vannoy, Steven D.

AU - Fancher, Tonya L

AU - Meltvedt, Caitlyn

AU - Unützer, Jürgen

AU - Duberstein, Paul

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - PURPOSE: We wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality. RESULTS: Most suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did."). CONCLUSION: Although most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.

AB - PURPOSE: We wanted to describe the vocabulary and narrative context of primary care physicians' inquiries about suicide. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two primary care physicians (53% to 61% of those approached) were randomly recruited from 4 sites in Northern California and Rochester, New York, to participate in a study assessing the effect of a patient's request for antidepressant medication on a physician's prescribing behavior. Standardized patients portraying 2 conditions (carpal tunnel syndrome and major depression, or back pain and adjustment disorder with depressed mood) and 3 antidepressant request types (brand-specific, general, or none) made 298 unannounced visits to these physicians between May 2003 and May 2004. Standardized patients were instructed to deny suicidality if the physician asked. We identified the subset of transcripts that contained a distinct suicide inquiry (n = 91) for inductive analysis and review. Our qualitative analysis focused on elucidating the narrative context in which inquiries are made, how physicians construct their inquiries, and how they respond to a patient's denial of suicidality. RESULTS: Most suicide inquiries used clear terminology related to self-harm, suicide, or killing oneself. Three types of inquiry were identified: (1) straightforward (eg, "Are you feeling like hurting yourself?"); (2) supportive framing (eg, "Sometimes depression gets so bad that people feel that life is no longer worth living. Have you felt this way?"); and (3) no problem preferred (eg, "You're not feeling suicidal, are you?"). Four inquiries were glaringly awkward, potentially inhibiting a patient's disclosure. Most (79%) suicide inquiries were preceded by statements focusing on psychosocial concerns, and most (86%) physician responses to a standardized patient's denial of ideation were followed up with relevant statements (eg, "I hope you would tell me if you did."). CONCLUSION: Although most suicide inquiries by primary care physicians are sensitive, clear, and supportive, some language is used that may inhibit suicide disclosure. Some physician responses may unintentionally reinforce patients for remaining silent about their risk. This study will inform future research in the development of quality improvement interventions to support primary care physicians in making clear, appropriate, and sensitive inquires about suicide.

KW - Depression

KW - Primary health care

KW - Suicide

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649171941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649171941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1036

DO - 10.1370/afm.1036

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 33

EP - 39

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 1

ER -