SU‐FF‐T‐448: Validation of a New Photon Dose Calculation Model—Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm

Yi Rong, C. Mubata, W. Chisela, H. Jaradat, D. Tewatia, B. Paliwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To validate a new photon dose calculation model Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) on Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS). Comparison of AAA dose calculation was performed with measurements and other two conventional algorithms, Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm on Eclipse™ and Collapsed Cone Convolution/Superposition (CCC) algorithm on Pinnacle3.0 TPS. Method and Materials: Four phantoms were CT scanned and the image set was imported into both TPS for dose computation and analysis. The four phantoms were: 1) homogenous tissue equivalent phantom, 2) tissue equivalent phantom with infinite lung heterogeneity, 3) tissue equivalent phantom with finite lung, 4) IMRT dose verification phantom. Measurements were made by exposing the phantom using Varian Linac. Point measurement and film measurements were compared with calculated results from the three algorithms. Dose responses for high and low energy photon beams were investigated for several different depths and PDD curves were compared in the phantom for various field sizes. The IMRT plans were generated by both TPS and were performed on the IMRT phantom to compare fluence maps. Results: AAA dose prediction fits the film measurements well except that there is up to ±6% discrepancy for dose profile perpendicular to the interface of tissue and lung. Point measurements support the AAA algorithm calculations. AAA also accurately predicts the decrease in PDD curves due to the lung inhomogeneity for 6MV energy. For the high energy photon beam and very small field size (2cm*2cm) in lung region, AAA prediction is up to 8% lower than the measurements. Conclusion: AAA algorithm accounts for attenuation corrections and electron transport, and models the deposited dose in the lung with greater accuracy than PBC. It is also faster than CCC algorithm. AAA algorithm can not accurately model the lateral scattering in tissue heterogeneity, but it can still give a reasonably close (within ±6%) prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2148-2149
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Photons
Lung
Electron Transport

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐T‐448 : Validation of a New Photon Dose Calculation Model—Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. / Rong, Yi; Mubata, C.; Chisela, W.; Jaradat, H.; Tewatia, D.; Paliwal, B.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 01.01.2006, p. 2148-2149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rong, Yi ; Mubata, C. ; Chisela, W. ; Jaradat, H. ; Tewatia, D. ; Paliwal, B. / SU‐FF‐T‐448 : Validation of a New Photon Dose Calculation Model—Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 6. pp. 2148-2149.
@article{d6b12feb8d38419ba01b9487049143f6,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐448: Validation of a New Photon Dose Calculation Model—Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm",
abstract = "Purpose: To validate a new photon dose calculation model Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) on Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS). Comparison of AAA dose calculation was performed with measurements and other two conventional algorithms, Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm on Eclipse™ and Collapsed Cone Convolution/Superposition (CCC) algorithm on Pinnacle3.0 TPS. Method and Materials: Four phantoms were CT scanned and the image set was imported into both TPS for dose computation and analysis. The four phantoms were: 1) homogenous tissue equivalent phantom, 2) tissue equivalent phantom with infinite lung heterogeneity, 3) tissue equivalent phantom with finite lung, 4) IMRT dose verification phantom. Measurements were made by exposing the phantom using Varian Linac. Point measurement and film measurements were compared with calculated results from the three algorithms. Dose responses for high and low energy photon beams were investigated for several different depths and PDD curves were compared in the phantom for various field sizes. The IMRT plans were generated by both TPS and were performed on the IMRT phantom to compare fluence maps. Results: AAA dose prediction fits the film measurements well except that there is up to ±6{\%} discrepancy for dose profile perpendicular to the interface of tissue and lung. Point measurements support the AAA algorithm calculations. AAA also accurately predicts the decrease in PDD curves due to the lung inhomogeneity for 6MV energy. For the high energy photon beam and very small field size (2cm*2cm) in lung region, AAA prediction is up to 8{\%} lower than the measurements. Conclusion: AAA algorithm accounts for attenuation corrections and electron transport, and models the deposited dose in the lung with greater accuracy than PBC. It is also faster than CCC algorithm. AAA algorithm can not accurately model the lateral scattering in tissue heterogeneity, but it can still give a reasonably close (within ±6{\%}) prediction.",
author = "Yi Rong and C. Mubata and W. Chisela and H. Jaradat and D. Tewatia and B. Paliwal",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.2241367",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "2148--2149",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐448

T2 - Validation of a New Photon Dose Calculation Model—Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm

AU - Rong, Yi

AU - Mubata, C.

AU - Chisela, W.

AU - Jaradat, H.

AU - Tewatia, D.

AU - Paliwal, B.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To validate a new photon dose calculation model Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) on Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS). Comparison of AAA dose calculation was performed with measurements and other two conventional algorithms, Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm on Eclipse™ and Collapsed Cone Convolution/Superposition (CCC) algorithm on Pinnacle3.0 TPS. Method and Materials: Four phantoms were CT scanned and the image set was imported into both TPS for dose computation and analysis. The four phantoms were: 1) homogenous tissue equivalent phantom, 2) tissue equivalent phantom with infinite lung heterogeneity, 3) tissue equivalent phantom with finite lung, 4) IMRT dose verification phantom. Measurements were made by exposing the phantom using Varian Linac. Point measurement and film measurements were compared with calculated results from the three algorithms. Dose responses for high and low energy photon beams were investigated for several different depths and PDD curves were compared in the phantom for various field sizes. The IMRT plans were generated by both TPS and were performed on the IMRT phantom to compare fluence maps. Results: AAA dose prediction fits the film measurements well except that there is up to ±6% discrepancy for dose profile perpendicular to the interface of tissue and lung. Point measurements support the AAA algorithm calculations. AAA also accurately predicts the decrease in PDD curves due to the lung inhomogeneity for 6MV energy. For the high energy photon beam and very small field size (2cm*2cm) in lung region, AAA prediction is up to 8% lower than the measurements. Conclusion: AAA algorithm accounts for attenuation corrections and electron transport, and models the deposited dose in the lung with greater accuracy than PBC. It is also faster than CCC algorithm. AAA algorithm can not accurately model the lateral scattering in tissue heterogeneity, but it can still give a reasonably close (within ±6%) prediction.

AB - Purpose: To validate a new photon dose calculation model Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) on Eclipse™ treatment planning system (TPS). Comparison of AAA dose calculation was performed with measurements and other two conventional algorithms, Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) algorithm on Eclipse™ and Collapsed Cone Convolution/Superposition (CCC) algorithm on Pinnacle3.0 TPS. Method and Materials: Four phantoms were CT scanned and the image set was imported into both TPS for dose computation and analysis. The four phantoms were: 1) homogenous tissue equivalent phantom, 2) tissue equivalent phantom with infinite lung heterogeneity, 3) tissue equivalent phantom with finite lung, 4) IMRT dose verification phantom. Measurements were made by exposing the phantom using Varian Linac. Point measurement and film measurements were compared with calculated results from the three algorithms. Dose responses for high and low energy photon beams were investigated for several different depths and PDD curves were compared in the phantom for various field sizes. The IMRT plans were generated by both TPS and were performed on the IMRT phantom to compare fluence maps. Results: AAA dose prediction fits the film measurements well except that there is up to ±6% discrepancy for dose profile perpendicular to the interface of tissue and lung. Point measurements support the AAA algorithm calculations. AAA also accurately predicts the decrease in PDD curves due to the lung inhomogeneity for 6MV energy. For the high energy photon beam and very small field size (2cm*2cm) in lung region, AAA prediction is up to 8% lower than the measurements. Conclusion: AAA algorithm accounts for attenuation corrections and electron transport, and models the deposited dose in the lung with greater accuracy than PBC. It is also faster than CCC algorithm. AAA algorithm can not accurately model the lateral scattering in tissue heterogeneity, but it can still give a reasonably close (within ±6%) prediction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955253614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955253614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2241367

DO - 10.1118/1.2241367

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955253614

VL - 33

SP - 2148

EP - 2149

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -