SU‐FF‐J‐120: Patient Motion During Extracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Advances in image‐guided treatments have made frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) feasible. Extracranial SRS treatments are highly conformal, and technical delivery precision on phantoms has been shown to be less than 1 mm. The human component of error, i.e. voluntary and involuntary motions during the treatment, plays an increasing role in the determination of PTV margins. The residual motion between imaging intervals during image‐guided treatments constitutes the treatment uncertainty and needs to be compensated by the application of a PTV margin. Method and Materials: During Cyberknife extracranial SRS, the patient position is verified by orthogonal x‐ray images every 80 seconds on average. Data of 90 extracranial SRS patients have been analyzed. The extent of patient motion has been studied during the whole treatment, the first 5 minutes and first 15 minutes of each treatment. Motion patterns of anatomical sub‐sites were studied. Results: The maximum frequency of all translational patient motions was in the range of 0.02–0.2 mm, with 90% of all motions below 1 mm. No differences between the three translational directions have been observed. The maximum frequency of rotational patient motions was between 0.1–0.2 degrees, with a wider distribution in the degree of roll. The average patient motion for cervical spine was 0.47 mm, thoracic spine 0.34 mm, and lumbar spine 0.29 mm. In the 214 fractions analyzed, patients moved on average 1 mm away from their original setup position after 5 minutes of treatment. No statistically significant difference exists for the range of patient motion during the first 5 or 15 minutes as compared to the whole treatment. Conclusion: For image‐guided treatments, PTV margins of 1.0 mm include 90% of observed patients motions for static lesions. Larger margins may be necessary if the treatment field is not rotationally symmetric around the isocenter.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1947-1948
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Radiosurgery
Therapeutics
Spine
Articular Range of Motion
Uncertainty
Thorax
X-Rays

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐J‐120 : Patient Motion During Extracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery. / Dieterich, Sonja; Xia, Y.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2005, p. 1947-1948.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c51a3b34efe24a86b80cab49eed36add,
title = "SU‐FF‐J‐120: Patient Motion During Extracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery",
abstract = "Purpose: Advances in image‐guided treatments have made frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) feasible. Extracranial SRS treatments are highly conformal, and technical delivery precision on phantoms has been shown to be less than 1 mm. The human component of error, i.e. voluntary and involuntary motions during the treatment, plays an increasing role in the determination of PTV margins. The residual motion between imaging intervals during image‐guided treatments constitutes the treatment uncertainty and needs to be compensated by the application of a PTV margin. Method and Materials: During Cyberknife extracranial SRS, the patient position is verified by orthogonal x‐ray images every 80 seconds on average. Data of 90 extracranial SRS patients have been analyzed. The extent of patient motion has been studied during the whole treatment, the first 5 minutes and first 15 minutes of each treatment. Motion patterns of anatomical sub‐sites were studied. Results: The maximum frequency of all translational patient motions was in the range of 0.02–0.2 mm, with 90{\%} of all motions below 1 mm. No differences between the three translational directions have been observed. The maximum frequency of rotational patient motions was between 0.1–0.2 degrees, with a wider distribution in the degree of roll. The average patient motion for cervical spine was 0.47 mm, thoracic spine 0.34 mm, and lumbar spine 0.29 mm. In the 214 fractions analyzed, patients moved on average 1 mm away from their original setup position after 5 minutes of treatment. No statistically significant difference exists for the range of patient motion during the first 5 or 15 minutes as compared to the whole treatment. Conclusion: For image‐guided treatments, PTV margins of 1.0 mm include 90{\%} of observed patients motions for static lesions. Larger margins may be necessary if the treatment field is not rotationally symmetric around the isocenter.",
author = "Sonja Dieterich and Y. Xia",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1118/1.1997666",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "1947--1948",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐J‐120

T2 - Patient Motion During Extracranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery

AU - Dieterich, Sonja

AU - Xia, Y.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose: Advances in image‐guided treatments have made frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) feasible. Extracranial SRS treatments are highly conformal, and technical delivery precision on phantoms has been shown to be less than 1 mm. The human component of error, i.e. voluntary and involuntary motions during the treatment, plays an increasing role in the determination of PTV margins. The residual motion between imaging intervals during image‐guided treatments constitutes the treatment uncertainty and needs to be compensated by the application of a PTV margin. Method and Materials: During Cyberknife extracranial SRS, the patient position is verified by orthogonal x‐ray images every 80 seconds on average. Data of 90 extracranial SRS patients have been analyzed. The extent of patient motion has been studied during the whole treatment, the first 5 minutes and first 15 minutes of each treatment. Motion patterns of anatomical sub‐sites were studied. Results: The maximum frequency of all translational patient motions was in the range of 0.02–0.2 mm, with 90% of all motions below 1 mm. No differences between the three translational directions have been observed. The maximum frequency of rotational patient motions was between 0.1–0.2 degrees, with a wider distribution in the degree of roll. The average patient motion for cervical spine was 0.47 mm, thoracic spine 0.34 mm, and lumbar spine 0.29 mm. In the 214 fractions analyzed, patients moved on average 1 mm away from their original setup position after 5 minutes of treatment. No statistically significant difference exists for the range of patient motion during the first 5 or 15 minutes as compared to the whole treatment. Conclusion: For image‐guided treatments, PTV margins of 1.0 mm include 90% of observed patients motions for static lesions. Larger margins may be necessary if the treatment field is not rotationally symmetric around the isocenter.

AB - Purpose: Advances in image‐guided treatments have made frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) feasible. Extracranial SRS treatments are highly conformal, and technical delivery precision on phantoms has been shown to be less than 1 mm. The human component of error, i.e. voluntary and involuntary motions during the treatment, plays an increasing role in the determination of PTV margins. The residual motion between imaging intervals during image‐guided treatments constitutes the treatment uncertainty and needs to be compensated by the application of a PTV margin. Method and Materials: During Cyberknife extracranial SRS, the patient position is verified by orthogonal x‐ray images every 80 seconds on average. Data of 90 extracranial SRS patients have been analyzed. The extent of patient motion has been studied during the whole treatment, the first 5 minutes and first 15 minutes of each treatment. Motion patterns of anatomical sub‐sites were studied. Results: The maximum frequency of all translational patient motions was in the range of 0.02–0.2 mm, with 90% of all motions below 1 mm. No differences between the three translational directions have been observed. The maximum frequency of rotational patient motions was between 0.1–0.2 degrees, with a wider distribution in the degree of roll. The average patient motion for cervical spine was 0.47 mm, thoracic spine 0.34 mm, and lumbar spine 0.29 mm. In the 214 fractions analyzed, patients moved on average 1 mm away from their original setup position after 5 minutes of treatment. No statistically significant difference exists for the range of patient motion during the first 5 or 15 minutes as compared to the whole treatment. Conclusion: For image‐guided treatments, PTV margins of 1.0 mm include 90% of observed patients motions for static lesions. Larger margins may be necessary if the treatment field is not rotationally symmetric around the isocenter.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70049100701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70049100701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.1997666

DO - 10.1118/1.1997666

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70049100701

VL - 32

SP - 1947

EP - 1948

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -