SU‐E‐T‐377: Evaluation of Calculated and Measured HDR Brachytherapy Doses in the Presence of Heterogeneities

B. Libby, R. Van Ausdal, J. Morrison, R. Ter‐antonyan, Stanley H Benedict

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: With the recent introduction of the Grid‐Based Boltzmann Solver (GBBS) in commercial HDR brachytherapy treatment planning (Acuros™, Varian), there is now a rapid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations to attain improved dosimetric accuracy. The validation of Acuros™ has been performed by comparison to Monte Carlo calculations in water phantom. In this investigation, we compare calculated and measured doses in the presence of both high and low density heterogeneities. Methods: Phantoms were created incorporating both low and high density heterogeneities including representative densities of bone and air cavities. For the comparisons HDR plans were developed to deliver 100 cGy with TG‐43 formalism to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors placed in or near the heterogeneities. The detectors were calibrated by exposure to a known dose. The plans were then recalculated using the Acuros™ algorithm, and the dose to the detectors was determined both by calculation and measurement. Results: The OSL detectors measured an average dose of 105 cGy when placed after a low density insert in the phantom, as compared to a calculated average dose of 107 cGy. When the OSL detectors were placed after three different higher density inserts ranging from 1.3 to 1.9 g/cm3, the measured doses were 78, 77, and 75 cGy, compared to the calculated doses of 84, 82, and 75 cGy. Conclusions: The Acuros™ algorithm has been demonstrated to perform rapid and accurate dosimetry in homogenous water phantom. In this study we demonstrate that it performs accurately in the vicinity of heterogeneities expected to be encountered in the clinic. This work shows good qualitative agreement between measured and calculated high dose rate brachytherapy doses in the presence of both low and high density heterogeneities, and shows that the confidence‐building step of comparing calculated to measured dose can be readily made with simple phantom geometries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3574
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Brachytherapy
Luminescence
Water
Bone Density
Air
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐377 : Evaluation of Calculated and Measured HDR Brachytherapy Doses in the Presence of Heterogeneities. / Libby, B.; Van Ausdal, R.; Morrison, J.; Ter‐antonyan, R.; Benedict, Stanley H.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011, p. 3574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Libby, B. ; Van Ausdal, R. ; Morrison, J. ; Ter‐antonyan, R. ; Benedict, Stanley H. / SU‐E‐T‐377 : Evaluation of Calculated and Measured HDR Brachytherapy Doses in the Presence of Heterogeneities. In: Medical Physics. 2011 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 3574.
@article{df0f3fca842f42658752281100509bf2,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐377: Evaluation of Calculated and Measured HDR Brachytherapy Doses in the Presence of Heterogeneities",
abstract = "Purpose: With the recent introduction of the Grid‐Based Boltzmann Solver (GBBS) in commercial HDR brachytherapy treatment planning (Acuros™, Varian), there is now a rapid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations to attain improved dosimetric accuracy. The validation of Acuros™ has been performed by comparison to Monte Carlo calculations in water phantom. In this investigation, we compare calculated and measured doses in the presence of both high and low density heterogeneities. Methods: Phantoms were created incorporating both low and high density heterogeneities including representative densities of bone and air cavities. For the comparisons HDR plans were developed to deliver 100 cGy with TG‐43 formalism to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors placed in or near the heterogeneities. The detectors were calibrated by exposure to a known dose. The plans were then recalculated using the Acuros™ algorithm, and the dose to the detectors was determined both by calculation and measurement. Results: The OSL detectors measured an average dose of 105 cGy when placed after a low density insert in the phantom, as compared to a calculated average dose of 107 cGy. When the OSL detectors were placed after three different higher density inserts ranging from 1.3 to 1.9 g/cm3, the measured doses were 78, 77, and 75 cGy, compared to the calculated doses of 84, 82, and 75 cGy. Conclusions: The Acuros™ algorithm has been demonstrated to perform rapid and accurate dosimetry in homogenous water phantom. In this study we demonstrate that it performs accurately in the vicinity of heterogeneities expected to be encountered in the clinic. This work shows good qualitative agreement between measured and calculated high dose rate brachytherapy doses in the presence of both low and high density heterogeneities, and shows that the confidence‐building step of comparing calculated to measured dose can be readily made with simple phantom geometries.",
author = "B. Libby and {Van Ausdal}, R. and J. Morrison and R. Ter‐antonyan and Benedict, {Stanley H}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3612331",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "3574",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐377

T2 - Evaluation of Calculated and Measured HDR Brachytherapy Doses in the Presence of Heterogeneities

AU - Libby, B.

AU - Van Ausdal, R.

AU - Morrison, J.

AU - Ter‐antonyan, R.

AU - Benedict, Stanley H

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: With the recent introduction of the Grid‐Based Boltzmann Solver (GBBS) in commercial HDR brachytherapy treatment planning (Acuros™, Varian), there is now a rapid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations to attain improved dosimetric accuracy. The validation of Acuros™ has been performed by comparison to Monte Carlo calculations in water phantom. In this investigation, we compare calculated and measured doses in the presence of both high and low density heterogeneities. Methods: Phantoms were created incorporating both low and high density heterogeneities including representative densities of bone and air cavities. For the comparisons HDR plans were developed to deliver 100 cGy with TG‐43 formalism to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors placed in or near the heterogeneities. The detectors were calibrated by exposure to a known dose. The plans were then recalculated using the Acuros™ algorithm, and the dose to the detectors was determined both by calculation and measurement. Results: The OSL detectors measured an average dose of 105 cGy when placed after a low density insert in the phantom, as compared to a calculated average dose of 107 cGy. When the OSL detectors were placed after three different higher density inserts ranging from 1.3 to 1.9 g/cm3, the measured doses were 78, 77, and 75 cGy, compared to the calculated doses of 84, 82, and 75 cGy. Conclusions: The Acuros™ algorithm has been demonstrated to perform rapid and accurate dosimetry in homogenous water phantom. In this study we demonstrate that it performs accurately in the vicinity of heterogeneities expected to be encountered in the clinic. This work shows good qualitative agreement between measured and calculated high dose rate brachytherapy doses in the presence of both low and high density heterogeneities, and shows that the confidence‐building step of comparing calculated to measured dose can be readily made with simple phantom geometries.

AB - Purpose: With the recent introduction of the Grid‐Based Boltzmann Solver (GBBS) in commercial HDR brachytherapy treatment planning (Acuros™, Varian), there is now a rapid and accurate alternative to Monte Carlo calculations to attain improved dosimetric accuracy. The validation of Acuros™ has been performed by comparison to Monte Carlo calculations in water phantom. In this investigation, we compare calculated and measured doses in the presence of both high and low density heterogeneities. Methods: Phantoms were created incorporating both low and high density heterogeneities including representative densities of bone and air cavities. For the comparisons HDR plans were developed to deliver 100 cGy with TG‐43 formalism to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors placed in or near the heterogeneities. The detectors were calibrated by exposure to a known dose. The plans were then recalculated using the Acuros™ algorithm, and the dose to the detectors was determined both by calculation and measurement. Results: The OSL detectors measured an average dose of 105 cGy when placed after a low density insert in the phantom, as compared to a calculated average dose of 107 cGy. When the OSL detectors were placed after three different higher density inserts ranging from 1.3 to 1.9 g/cm3, the measured doses were 78, 77, and 75 cGy, compared to the calculated doses of 84, 82, and 75 cGy. Conclusions: The Acuros™ algorithm has been demonstrated to perform rapid and accurate dosimetry in homogenous water phantom. In this study we demonstrate that it performs accurately in the vicinity of heterogeneities expected to be encountered in the clinic. This work shows good qualitative agreement between measured and calculated high dose rate brachytherapy doses in the presence of both low and high density heterogeneities, and shows that the confidence‐building step of comparing calculated to measured dose can be readily made with simple phantom geometries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024825968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024825968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3612331

DO - 10.1118/1.3612331

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024825968

VL - 38

SP - 3574

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -