Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms

Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages

Tony J Simon, Sandeep Vaishnavi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two experiments showed that, when selective eye movements were disabled by the presentation of stimuli in the form of afterimages, increased inspection time and facilitative stimulus configurations failed to increase the subitizing limit of 4 objects. Afterimages of two to eight dots induced by a photographic flashgun were shown to 3 adult subjects. For more than 4 objects, enumeration errors occurred at a rate of 20%-30%. Enumeration was effectively perfect for 2-4 linearly configured dots, with occasional errors surprisingly occurring in that range when dots appeared in groups of up to 3 items. No errors occurred in nonafterimage control conditions. Enumeration errors were attributed to failures of individuating dots to be counted due to the deactivation of selective eye movements in afterimages. A third experiment supported this interpretation by disabling eye movements with briefly presented stimuli and producing results much like those of the afterimage conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)915-926
Number of pages12
JournalPerception & Psychophysics
Volume58
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Afterimage
Eye Movements
stimulus
evidence
experiment
interpretation
Subitizing
Enumeration
Stimulus
Group
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms : Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages. / Simon, Tony J; Vaishnavi, Sandeep.

In: Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 58, No. 6, 01.1996, p. 915-926.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4eb3c0417461442cba607a3124c02218,
title = "Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms: Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages",
abstract = "Two experiments showed that, when selective eye movements were disabled by the presentation of stimuli in the form of afterimages, increased inspection time and facilitative stimulus configurations failed to increase the subitizing limit of 4 objects. Afterimages of two to eight dots induced by a photographic flashgun were shown to 3 adult subjects. For more than 4 objects, enumeration errors occurred at a rate of 20{\%}-30{\%}. Enumeration was effectively perfect for 2-4 linearly configured dots, with occasional errors surprisingly occurring in that range when dots appeared in groups of up to 3 items. No errors occurred in nonafterimage control conditions. Enumeration errors were attributed to failures of individuating dots to be counted due to the deactivation of selective eye movements in afterimages. A third experiment supported this interpretation by disabling eye movements with briefly presented stimuli and producing results much like those of the afterimage conditions.",
author = "Simon, {Tony J} and Sandeep Vaishnavi",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03205493",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "915--926",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Subitizing and counting depend on different attentional mechanisms

T2 - Evidence from visual enumeration in afterimages

AU - Simon, Tony J

AU - Vaishnavi, Sandeep

PY - 1996/1

Y1 - 1996/1

N2 - Two experiments showed that, when selective eye movements were disabled by the presentation of stimuli in the form of afterimages, increased inspection time and facilitative stimulus configurations failed to increase the subitizing limit of 4 objects. Afterimages of two to eight dots induced by a photographic flashgun were shown to 3 adult subjects. For more than 4 objects, enumeration errors occurred at a rate of 20%-30%. Enumeration was effectively perfect for 2-4 linearly configured dots, with occasional errors surprisingly occurring in that range when dots appeared in groups of up to 3 items. No errors occurred in nonafterimage control conditions. Enumeration errors were attributed to failures of individuating dots to be counted due to the deactivation of selective eye movements in afterimages. A third experiment supported this interpretation by disabling eye movements with briefly presented stimuli and producing results much like those of the afterimage conditions.

AB - Two experiments showed that, when selective eye movements were disabled by the presentation of stimuli in the form of afterimages, increased inspection time and facilitative stimulus configurations failed to increase the subitizing limit of 4 objects. Afterimages of two to eight dots induced by a photographic flashgun were shown to 3 adult subjects. For more than 4 objects, enumeration errors occurred at a rate of 20%-30%. Enumeration was effectively perfect for 2-4 linearly configured dots, with occasional errors surprisingly occurring in that range when dots appeared in groups of up to 3 items. No errors occurred in nonafterimage control conditions. Enumeration errors were attributed to failures of individuating dots to be counted due to the deactivation of selective eye movements in afterimages. A third experiment supported this interpretation by disabling eye movements with briefly presented stimuli and producing results much like those of the afterimage conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030210179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030210179&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03205493

DO - 10.3758/BF03205493

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 915

EP - 926

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 6

ER -