Structural gene (prME) chimeras of st louis encephalitis virus and West nile virus exhibit altered in vitro cytopathic and growth phenotypes

Payal D. Maharaj, Michael Anishchenko, Stanley A. Langevin, Ying Fang, William Reisen, Aaron Brault

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite utilizing the same avian hosts and mosquito vectors, St Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) display dissimilar vector-infectivity and vertebrate-pathogenic phenotypes. SLEV exhibits a low oral infection threshold for Culex mosquito vectors and is avirulent in avian hosts, producing low-magnitude viraemias. In contrast, WNV is less orally infective to mosquitoes and elicits high-magnitude viraemias in a wide range of avian species. In order to identify the genetic determinants of these different phenotypes and to assess the utility of mosquito and vertebrate cell lines for recapitulating in vivo differences observed between these viruses, reciprocal WNV and SLEV pre-membrane and envelope protein (prME) chimeric viruses were generated and growth of these mutant viruses was characterized in mammalian (Vero), avian (duck) and mosquito [Aedes (C6/36) and Culex (CT)] cells. In both vertebrate lines, WNV grew to 100-fold higher titres than SLEV, and growth and cytopathogenicity phenotypes, determined by chimeric phenotypes, were modulated by genetic elements outside the prME gene region. Both chimeras exhibited distinctive growth patterns from those of SLEV in C6/36 cells, indicating the role of both structural and non-structural gene regions for growth in this cell line. In contrast, growth of chimeric viruses was indistinguishable from that of virus containing homologous prME genes in CT cells, indicating that structural genetic elements could specifically dictate growth differences of these viruses in relevant vectors. These data provide genetic insight into divergent enzootic maintenance strategies that could also be useful for the assessment of emergence mechanisms of closely related flaviviruses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-49
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of General Virology
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Encephalitis Viruses
West Nile virus
Membrane Proteins
Viruses
Phenotype
Growth
Culicidae
Genes
Vertebrates
Culex
Flavivirus
Cell Line
Ducks
Aedes
In Vitro Techniques
Maintenance
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Virology

Cite this

Structural gene (prME) chimeras of st louis encephalitis virus and West nile virus exhibit altered in vitro cytopathic and growth phenotypes. / Maharaj, Payal D.; Anishchenko, Michael; Langevin, Stanley A.; Fang, Ying; Reisen, William; Brault, Aaron.

In: Journal of General Virology, Vol. 93, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 39-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{493220b4172843e08978c9e809f837dd,
title = "Structural gene (prME) chimeras of st louis encephalitis virus and West nile virus exhibit altered in vitro cytopathic and growth phenotypes",
abstract = "Despite utilizing the same avian hosts and mosquito vectors, St Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) display dissimilar vector-infectivity and vertebrate-pathogenic phenotypes. SLEV exhibits a low oral infection threshold for Culex mosquito vectors and is avirulent in avian hosts, producing low-magnitude viraemias. In contrast, WNV is less orally infective to mosquitoes and elicits high-magnitude viraemias in a wide range of avian species. In order to identify the genetic determinants of these different phenotypes and to assess the utility of mosquito and vertebrate cell lines for recapitulating in vivo differences observed between these viruses, reciprocal WNV and SLEV pre-membrane and envelope protein (prME) chimeric viruses were generated and growth of these mutant viruses was characterized in mammalian (Vero), avian (duck) and mosquito [Aedes (C6/36) and Culex (CT)] cells. In both vertebrate lines, WNV grew to 100-fold higher titres than SLEV, and growth and cytopathogenicity phenotypes, determined by chimeric phenotypes, were modulated by genetic elements outside the prME gene region. Both chimeras exhibited distinctive growth patterns from those of SLEV in C6/36 cells, indicating the role of both structural and non-structural gene regions for growth in this cell line. In contrast, growth of chimeric viruses was indistinguishable from that of virus containing homologous prME genes in CT cells, indicating that structural genetic elements could specifically dictate growth differences of these viruses in relevant vectors. These data provide genetic insight into divergent enzootic maintenance strategies that could also be useful for the assessment of emergence mechanisms of closely related flaviviruses.",
author = "Maharaj, {Payal D.} and Michael Anishchenko and Langevin, {Stanley A.} and Ying Fang and William Reisen and Aaron Brault",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1099/vir.0.033159-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "93",
pages = "39--49",
journal = "Journal of General Virology",
issn = "0022-1317",
publisher = "Society for General Microbiology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural gene (prME) chimeras of st louis encephalitis virus and West nile virus exhibit altered in vitro cytopathic and growth phenotypes

AU - Maharaj, Payal D.

AU - Anishchenko, Michael

AU - Langevin, Stanley A.

AU - Fang, Ying

AU - Reisen, William

AU - Brault, Aaron

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Despite utilizing the same avian hosts and mosquito vectors, St Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) display dissimilar vector-infectivity and vertebrate-pathogenic phenotypes. SLEV exhibits a low oral infection threshold for Culex mosquito vectors and is avirulent in avian hosts, producing low-magnitude viraemias. In contrast, WNV is less orally infective to mosquitoes and elicits high-magnitude viraemias in a wide range of avian species. In order to identify the genetic determinants of these different phenotypes and to assess the utility of mosquito and vertebrate cell lines for recapitulating in vivo differences observed between these viruses, reciprocal WNV and SLEV pre-membrane and envelope protein (prME) chimeric viruses were generated and growth of these mutant viruses was characterized in mammalian (Vero), avian (duck) and mosquito [Aedes (C6/36) and Culex (CT)] cells. In both vertebrate lines, WNV grew to 100-fold higher titres than SLEV, and growth and cytopathogenicity phenotypes, determined by chimeric phenotypes, were modulated by genetic elements outside the prME gene region. Both chimeras exhibited distinctive growth patterns from those of SLEV in C6/36 cells, indicating the role of both structural and non-structural gene regions for growth in this cell line. In contrast, growth of chimeric viruses was indistinguishable from that of virus containing homologous prME genes in CT cells, indicating that structural genetic elements could specifically dictate growth differences of these viruses in relevant vectors. These data provide genetic insight into divergent enzootic maintenance strategies that could also be useful for the assessment of emergence mechanisms of closely related flaviviruses.

AB - Despite utilizing the same avian hosts and mosquito vectors, St Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) display dissimilar vector-infectivity and vertebrate-pathogenic phenotypes. SLEV exhibits a low oral infection threshold for Culex mosquito vectors and is avirulent in avian hosts, producing low-magnitude viraemias. In contrast, WNV is less orally infective to mosquitoes and elicits high-magnitude viraemias in a wide range of avian species. In order to identify the genetic determinants of these different phenotypes and to assess the utility of mosquito and vertebrate cell lines for recapitulating in vivo differences observed between these viruses, reciprocal WNV and SLEV pre-membrane and envelope protein (prME) chimeric viruses were generated and growth of these mutant viruses was characterized in mammalian (Vero), avian (duck) and mosquito [Aedes (C6/36) and Culex (CT)] cells. In both vertebrate lines, WNV grew to 100-fold higher titres than SLEV, and growth and cytopathogenicity phenotypes, determined by chimeric phenotypes, were modulated by genetic elements outside the prME gene region. Both chimeras exhibited distinctive growth patterns from those of SLEV in C6/36 cells, indicating the role of both structural and non-structural gene regions for growth in this cell line. In contrast, growth of chimeric viruses was indistinguishable from that of virus containing homologous prME genes in CT cells, indicating that structural genetic elements could specifically dictate growth differences of these viruses in relevant vectors. These data provide genetic insight into divergent enzootic maintenance strategies that could also be useful for the assessment of emergence mechanisms of closely related flaviviruses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83755173079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83755173079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1099/vir.0.033159-0

DO - 10.1099/vir.0.033159-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 21940408

AN - SCOPUS:83755173079

VL - 93

SP - 39

EP - 49

JO - Journal of General Virology

JF - Journal of General Virology

SN - 0022-1317

IS - 1

ER -