Structural alignment in induction and similarity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attributes and relations they shared were used to assess the relationship between induction and similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, the number of shared attributes and the presence of 2 kinds of causal relations between attributes varied. Shared attributes increased both similarity and inductive strength judgments. Shared causal relations, possessed by both animals, influenced perceived similarity, but binding causal relations, which connected a shared attribute to a candidate inference in the induction task, were important for inductive strength. In Experiments 3-5, these results were extended through use of a noncausal relation and familiar animal categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-770
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

induction
animal
experiment
candidacy
Induction
Alignment
Causal Relation
Experiment
Animals
Inference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Structural alignment in induction and similarity. / Utter, Mary.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.01.1996, p. 754-770.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f793012119904b6aa9bacc4309c81d5b,
title = "Structural alignment in induction and similarity",
abstract = "According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attributes and relations they shared were used to assess the relationship between induction and similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, the number of shared attributes and the presence of 2 kinds of causal relations between attributes varied. Shared attributes increased both similarity and inductive strength judgments. Shared causal relations, possessed by both animals, influenced perceived similarity, but binding causal relations, which connected a shared attribute to a candidate inference in the induction task, were important for inductive strength. In Experiments 3-5, these results were extended through use of a noncausal relation and familiar animal categories.",
author = "Mary Utter",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.754",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "754--770",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structural alignment in induction and similarity

AU - Utter, Mary

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attributes and relations they shared were used to assess the relationship between induction and similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, the number of shared attributes and the presence of 2 kinds of causal relations between attributes varied. Shared attributes increased both similarity and inductive strength judgments. Shared causal relations, possessed by both animals, influenced perceived similarity, but binding causal relations, which connected a shared attribute to a candidate inference in the induction task, were important for inductive strength. In Experiments 3-5, these results were extended through use of a noncausal relation and familiar animal categories.

AB - According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attributes and relations they shared were used to assess the relationship between induction and similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, the number of shared attributes and the presence of 2 kinds of causal relations between attributes varied. Shared attributes increased both similarity and inductive strength judgments. Shared causal relations, possessed by both animals, influenced perceived similarity, but binding causal relations, which connected a shared attribute to a candidate inference in the induction task, were important for inductive strength. In Experiments 3-5, these results were extended through use of a noncausal relation and familiar animal categories.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030136852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030136852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.754

DO - 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.754

M3 - Article

C2 - 8656155

AN - SCOPUS:0030136852

VL - 22

SP - 754

EP - 770

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 3

ER -