Strength of bone tunnel versus suture anchor and push-lock construct in Broström Repair

Eric Giza, Ryan Nathe, Tyler Nathe, Matthew Anderson, Valentina Campanelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Operative treatment of mechanical ankle instability is indicated for patients who have had multiple sprains and have continued episodes of instability despite bracing and rehabilitation. Anatomic reconstruction has been shown to have improved outcomes and return to sport as compared with nonanatomic reconstruction.Hypothesis: The use of 2 suture anchors and a push-lock anchor is equal to 2 bone tunnels in strength to failure for anatomic Broström repair.Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.Methods: In 7 matched pairs of human cadaver ankles, the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) were incised from their origin on the fibula. A No. 2 Fiberwire suture was placed into the CFL and a separate suture into the ATFL in a running Krackow fashion with a total of 4 locking loops. In 1 ankle of the matched pair, the ligaments were repaired to their anatomic insertion with bone tunnels. In the other, 2 suture anchors were used to reattach the ligaments to their anatomic origins, and a push-lock was used proximally to reinforce these suture anchors. The ligaments were cyclically loaded 20 times and then tested to failure. Torque to failure, degrees to failure, and stiffness were measured. The authors performed a matched pair analysis. An a priori power analysis of 0.8 demonstrated 6 pairs were needed to show a difference of 30% with a 15% standard error at a significance level of.05.Results: There was no difference in the degrees to failure, torque to failure, and stiffness. A post hoc power analysis of torque to failure showed a power of.89 with 7 samples. Power for initial stiffness was.97 with 7 samples. Eleven of 14 specimens failed at either the suture anchor or the bone tunnel.Conclusion: There is no statistical difference in strength or stiffness for a suture anchor and push-lock construct as compared with a bone tunnel construct for an anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle.Clinical Relevance: The use of suture anchors in lateral ligament stabilization allows for a smaller incision, less surgical dissection, and improved surgical efficiency. It is up to the discretion of the performing surgeon based on preference, ease of use, operative time, and cost profile to choose either of these constructs for anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. The suture repair at the ligament was significantly strong enough such that the majority of ankles failed at the bone interface.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1419-1423
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

Fingerprint

Suture Anchors
Ligaments
Ankle Lateral Ligament
Bone and Bones
Ankle
Torque
Sutures
Sprains and Strains
Matched-Pair Analysis
Collateral Ligaments
Fibula
Operative Time
Cadaver
Running
Dissection
Rehabilitation
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • ankle lateral ligament
  • bone tunnel
  • Broström
  • strength
  • suture anchor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Strength of bone tunnel versus suture anchor and push-lock construct in Broström Repair. / Giza, Eric; Nathe, Ryan; Nathe, Tyler; Anderson, Matthew; Campanelli, Valentina.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 6, 06.2012, p. 1419-1423.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Giza, Eric ; Nathe, Ryan ; Nathe, Tyler ; Anderson, Matthew ; Campanelli, Valentina. / Strength of bone tunnel versus suture anchor and push-lock construct in Broström Repair. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2012 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 1419-1423.
@article{755a5fc8edc549409c49b9182b913f5e,
title = "Strength of bone tunnel versus suture anchor and push-lock construct in Brostr{\"o}m Repair",
abstract = "Background: Operative treatment of mechanical ankle instability is indicated for patients who have had multiple sprains and have continued episodes of instability despite bracing and rehabilitation. Anatomic reconstruction has been shown to have improved outcomes and return to sport as compared with nonanatomic reconstruction.Hypothesis: The use of 2 suture anchors and a push-lock anchor is equal to 2 bone tunnels in strength to failure for anatomic Brostr{\"o}m repair.Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.Methods: In 7 matched pairs of human cadaver ankles, the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) were incised from their origin on the fibula. A No. 2 Fiberwire suture was placed into the CFL and a separate suture into the ATFL in a running Krackow fashion with a total of 4 locking loops. In 1 ankle of the matched pair, the ligaments were repaired to their anatomic insertion with bone tunnels. In the other, 2 suture anchors were used to reattach the ligaments to their anatomic origins, and a push-lock was used proximally to reinforce these suture anchors. The ligaments were cyclically loaded 20 times and then tested to failure. Torque to failure, degrees to failure, and stiffness were measured. The authors performed a matched pair analysis. An a priori power analysis of 0.8 demonstrated 6 pairs were needed to show a difference of 30{\%} with a 15{\%} standard error at a significance level of.05.Results: There was no difference in the degrees to failure, torque to failure, and stiffness. A post hoc power analysis of torque to failure showed a power of.89 with 7 samples. Power for initial stiffness was.97 with 7 samples. Eleven of 14 specimens failed at either the suture anchor or the bone tunnel.Conclusion: There is no statistical difference in strength or stiffness for a suture anchor and push-lock construct as compared with a bone tunnel construct for an anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle.Clinical Relevance: The use of suture anchors in lateral ligament stabilization allows for a smaller incision, less surgical dissection, and improved surgical efficiency. It is up to the discretion of the performing surgeon based on preference, ease of use, operative time, and cost profile to choose either of these constructs for anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. The suture repair at the ligament was significantly strong enough such that the majority of ankles failed at the bone interface.",
keywords = "ankle lateral ligament, bone tunnel, Brostr{\"o}m, strength, suture anchor",
author = "Eric Giza and Ryan Nathe and Tyler Nathe and Matthew Anderson and Valentina Campanelli",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/0363546512443947",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1419--1423",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strength of bone tunnel versus suture anchor and push-lock construct in Broström Repair

AU - Giza, Eric

AU - Nathe, Ryan

AU - Nathe, Tyler

AU - Anderson, Matthew

AU - Campanelli, Valentina

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Background: Operative treatment of mechanical ankle instability is indicated for patients who have had multiple sprains and have continued episodes of instability despite bracing and rehabilitation. Anatomic reconstruction has been shown to have improved outcomes and return to sport as compared with nonanatomic reconstruction.Hypothesis: The use of 2 suture anchors and a push-lock anchor is equal to 2 bone tunnels in strength to failure for anatomic Broström repair.Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.Methods: In 7 matched pairs of human cadaver ankles, the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) were incised from their origin on the fibula. A No. 2 Fiberwire suture was placed into the CFL and a separate suture into the ATFL in a running Krackow fashion with a total of 4 locking loops. In 1 ankle of the matched pair, the ligaments were repaired to their anatomic insertion with bone tunnels. In the other, 2 suture anchors were used to reattach the ligaments to their anatomic origins, and a push-lock was used proximally to reinforce these suture anchors. The ligaments were cyclically loaded 20 times and then tested to failure. Torque to failure, degrees to failure, and stiffness were measured. The authors performed a matched pair analysis. An a priori power analysis of 0.8 demonstrated 6 pairs were needed to show a difference of 30% with a 15% standard error at a significance level of.05.Results: There was no difference in the degrees to failure, torque to failure, and stiffness. A post hoc power analysis of torque to failure showed a power of.89 with 7 samples. Power for initial stiffness was.97 with 7 samples. Eleven of 14 specimens failed at either the suture anchor or the bone tunnel.Conclusion: There is no statistical difference in strength or stiffness for a suture anchor and push-lock construct as compared with a bone tunnel construct for an anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle.Clinical Relevance: The use of suture anchors in lateral ligament stabilization allows for a smaller incision, less surgical dissection, and improved surgical efficiency. It is up to the discretion of the performing surgeon based on preference, ease of use, operative time, and cost profile to choose either of these constructs for anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. The suture repair at the ligament was significantly strong enough such that the majority of ankles failed at the bone interface.

AB - Background: Operative treatment of mechanical ankle instability is indicated for patients who have had multiple sprains and have continued episodes of instability despite bracing and rehabilitation. Anatomic reconstruction has been shown to have improved outcomes and return to sport as compared with nonanatomic reconstruction.Hypothesis: The use of 2 suture anchors and a push-lock anchor is equal to 2 bone tunnels in strength to failure for anatomic Broström repair.Study Design: Controlled laboratory study.Methods: In 7 matched pairs of human cadaver ankles, the calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) were incised from their origin on the fibula. A No. 2 Fiberwire suture was placed into the CFL and a separate suture into the ATFL in a running Krackow fashion with a total of 4 locking loops. In 1 ankle of the matched pair, the ligaments were repaired to their anatomic insertion with bone tunnels. In the other, 2 suture anchors were used to reattach the ligaments to their anatomic origins, and a push-lock was used proximally to reinforce these suture anchors. The ligaments were cyclically loaded 20 times and then tested to failure. Torque to failure, degrees to failure, and stiffness were measured. The authors performed a matched pair analysis. An a priori power analysis of 0.8 demonstrated 6 pairs were needed to show a difference of 30% with a 15% standard error at a significance level of.05.Results: There was no difference in the degrees to failure, torque to failure, and stiffness. A post hoc power analysis of torque to failure showed a power of.89 with 7 samples. Power for initial stiffness was.97 with 7 samples. Eleven of 14 specimens failed at either the suture anchor or the bone tunnel.Conclusion: There is no statistical difference in strength or stiffness for a suture anchor and push-lock construct as compared with a bone tunnel construct for an anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle.Clinical Relevance: The use of suture anchors in lateral ligament stabilization allows for a smaller incision, less surgical dissection, and improved surgical efficiency. It is up to the discretion of the performing surgeon based on preference, ease of use, operative time, and cost profile to choose either of these constructs for anatomic repair of the lateral ligaments of the ankle. The suture repair at the ligament was significantly strong enough such that the majority of ankles failed at the bone interface.

KW - ankle lateral ligament

KW - bone tunnel

KW - Broström

KW - strength

KW - suture anchor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861825510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861825510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0363546512443947

DO - 10.1177/0363546512443947

M3 - Article

C2 - 22529010

AN - SCOPUS:84861825510

VL - 40

SP - 1419

EP - 1423

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 6

ER -