Straightforward method for singularized and region-specific CNS microvessels isolation

Jacquelyn Rose Dayton, Marissa Cindy Franke, Yinyu Yuan, Lillian Cruz-Orengo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Current methods for murine brain microvasculature isolation requires the pooling of brain cortices while disregarding the rest of the CNS, making the analysis of single individuals non feasible. New method: Efficient isolation of brain microvessels requires the elimination of meninges, vessels of high caliber vessels and choroid plexus, commonly done by rolling the over filter paper, but can't be done on other CNS regions. We overcome this hurdle by using a double-pronged pick, as well as elution and filtration through cell strainers after centrifugation. Results: We were able to develop a region-specific murine CNS microvessels isolation, that allows for the comparison of the neurovascular unit from these regions both within the same individual and between multiple individuals and/or treatment groups without pooling. Additionally, we were able to adapt this method to macaque CNS tissue. Comparison with existing method(s): Although similar to a previously published method that requires no enzymatic dissociation and no ultracentrifugation, it does differ in its ability to isolate from a single experimental animal and from non-cortical tissues. However, it relies heavily on the researcher dissecting skills and careful elution and filtration of re-suspended samples. Conclusions: CNS region-specific microvessels comparison can inform of molecular and/or cellular differences that would otherwise be obscured by excluding non-cortical tissue. Additionally, it allows for the unmasking of variations between individuals that remained hidden when pooling of multiple samples is the norm. Lastly, isolation of region-specific microvessels for non-human primate CNS allows for more translationally relevant studies of the BBB.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-33
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Neuroscience Methods
Volume318
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2019

Fingerprint

Microvessels
Brain
Meninges
Choroid Plexus
Ultracentrifugation
Macaca
Centrifugation
Primates
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Astrocytic end-feet
  • Blood-brain barrier
  • Endothelial cell
  • Junctional proteins
  • Microvasculature
  • Neurovascular unit
  • Pericyte

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Straightforward method for singularized and region-specific CNS microvessels isolation. / Dayton, Jacquelyn Rose; Franke, Marissa Cindy; Yuan, Yinyu; Cruz-Orengo, Lillian.

In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol. 318, 15.04.2019, p. 17-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dayton, Jacquelyn Rose ; Franke, Marissa Cindy ; Yuan, Yinyu ; Cruz-Orengo, Lillian. / Straightforward method for singularized and region-specific CNS microvessels isolation. In: Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 2019 ; Vol. 318. pp. 17-33.
@article{cc39d56afe1943c9836208c23b2cbe43,
title = "Straightforward method for singularized and region-specific CNS microvessels isolation",
abstract = "Background: Current methods for murine brain microvasculature isolation requires the pooling of brain cortices while disregarding the rest of the CNS, making the analysis of single individuals non feasible. New method: Efficient isolation of brain microvessels requires the elimination of meninges, vessels of high caliber vessels and choroid plexus, commonly done by rolling the over filter paper, but can't be done on other CNS regions. We overcome this hurdle by using a double-pronged pick, as well as elution and filtration through cell strainers after centrifugation. Results: We were able to develop a region-specific murine CNS microvessels isolation, that allows for the comparison of the neurovascular unit from these regions both within the same individual and between multiple individuals and/or treatment groups without pooling. Additionally, we were able to adapt this method to macaque CNS tissue. Comparison with existing method(s): Although similar to a previously published method that requires no enzymatic dissociation and no ultracentrifugation, it does differ in its ability to isolate from a single experimental animal and from non-cortical tissues. However, it relies heavily on the researcher dissecting skills and careful elution and filtration of re-suspended samples. Conclusions: CNS region-specific microvessels comparison can inform of molecular and/or cellular differences that would otherwise be obscured by excluding non-cortical tissue. Additionally, it allows for the unmasking of variations between individuals that remained hidden when pooling of multiple samples is the norm. Lastly, isolation of region-specific microvessels for non-human primate CNS allows for more translationally relevant studies of the BBB.",
keywords = "Astrocytic end-feet, Blood-brain barrier, Endothelial cell, Junctional proteins, Microvasculature, Neurovascular unit, Pericyte",
author = "Dayton, {Jacquelyn Rose} and Franke, {Marissa Cindy} and Yinyu Yuan and Lillian Cruz-Orengo",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "318",
pages = "17--33",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience Methods",
issn = "0165-0270",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Straightforward method for singularized and region-specific CNS microvessels isolation

AU - Dayton, Jacquelyn Rose

AU - Franke, Marissa Cindy

AU - Yuan, Yinyu

AU - Cruz-Orengo, Lillian

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - Background: Current methods for murine brain microvasculature isolation requires the pooling of brain cortices while disregarding the rest of the CNS, making the analysis of single individuals non feasible. New method: Efficient isolation of brain microvessels requires the elimination of meninges, vessels of high caliber vessels and choroid plexus, commonly done by rolling the over filter paper, but can't be done on other CNS regions. We overcome this hurdle by using a double-pronged pick, as well as elution and filtration through cell strainers after centrifugation. Results: We were able to develop a region-specific murine CNS microvessels isolation, that allows for the comparison of the neurovascular unit from these regions both within the same individual and between multiple individuals and/or treatment groups without pooling. Additionally, we were able to adapt this method to macaque CNS tissue. Comparison with existing method(s): Although similar to a previously published method that requires no enzymatic dissociation and no ultracentrifugation, it does differ in its ability to isolate from a single experimental animal and from non-cortical tissues. However, it relies heavily on the researcher dissecting skills and careful elution and filtration of re-suspended samples. Conclusions: CNS region-specific microvessels comparison can inform of molecular and/or cellular differences that would otherwise be obscured by excluding non-cortical tissue. Additionally, it allows for the unmasking of variations between individuals that remained hidden when pooling of multiple samples is the norm. Lastly, isolation of region-specific microvessels for non-human primate CNS allows for more translationally relevant studies of the BBB.

AB - Background: Current methods for murine brain microvasculature isolation requires the pooling of brain cortices while disregarding the rest of the CNS, making the analysis of single individuals non feasible. New method: Efficient isolation of brain microvessels requires the elimination of meninges, vessels of high caliber vessels and choroid plexus, commonly done by rolling the over filter paper, but can't be done on other CNS regions. We overcome this hurdle by using a double-pronged pick, as well as elution and filtration through cell strainers after centrifugation. Results: We were able to develop a region-specific murine CNS microvessels isolation, that allows for the comparison of the neurovascular unit from these regions both within the same individual and between multiple individuals and/or treatment groups without pooling. Additionally, we were able to adapt this method to macaque CNS tissue. Comparison with existing method(s): Although similar to a previously published method that requires no enzymatic dissociation and no ultracentrifugation, it does differ in its ability to isolate from a single experimental animal and from non-cortical tissues. However, it relies heavily on the researcher dissecting skills and careful elution and filtration of re-suspended samples. Conclusions: CNS region-specific microvessels comparison can inform of molecular and/or cellular differences that would otherwise be obscured by excluding non-cortical tissue. Additionally, it allows for the unmasking of variations between individuals that remained hidden when pooling of multiple samples is the norm. Lastly, isolation of region-specific microvessels for non-human primate CNS allows for more translationally relevant studies of the BBB.

KW - Astrocytic end-feet

KW - Blood-brain barrier

KW - Endothelial cell

KW - Junctional proteins

KW - Microvasculature

KW - Neurovascular unit

KW - Pericyte

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062220235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062220235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.02.007

M3 - Article

VL - 318

SP - 17

EP - 33

JO - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

JF - Journal of Neuroscience Methods

SN - 0165-0270

ER -