Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels

C. A. Johnson, John L Keltner, F. G. Balestrery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effects of target size, eccentricity and background luminance were determined for static and acuity profile perimetry in the central 30° radius of the visual field. Reductions in target size produced decreases in sensitivity for both functions, with acuity profiles (resolution sensitivity) being more affected than static profiles (detection sensitivity). At photopic background luminances, detection sensitivity was greatest at the fovea and progressively declined with increasing eccentricity; lower background luminances produced greater detection sensitivity for the near periphery than for the fovea. Resolution sensitivity for small targets (20/80 or less) exhibited a rapid decline with increasing eccentricity that was relatively independent of background luminance, whereas large targets (20/125 or greater) revealed findings similar to the detection sensitivity results. The relative contributions of rods and cones to threshold visual responses thus appear to depend on the type of visual task, target size, eccentricity, background luminance and thek interactions. These data provide a comparison basis for future evaluations of patients with photoreceptor dysfunction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-388
Number of pages18
JournalDocumenta Ophthalmologica
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1981

Fingerprint

Vertebrate Photoreceptor Cells
Visual Field Tests
Visual Fields

Keywords

  • Acuity profile perimetry
  • Mesopic
  • Photopic
  • Scotopic adaptation
  • Static perimetry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels. / Johnson, C. A.; Keltner, John L; Balestrery, F. G.

In: Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 50, No. 2, 03.1981, p. 371-388.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Johnson, C. A. ; Keltner, John L ; Balestrery, F. G. / Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels. In: Documenta Ophthalmologica. 1981 ; Vol. 50, No. 2. pp. 371-388.
@article{8d3911d017ee478ab3f80dd419cc077a,
title = "Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels",
abstract = "Effects of target size, eccentricity and background luminance were determined for static and acuity profile perimetry in the central 30° radius of the visual field. Reductions in target size produced decreases in sensitivity for both functions, with acuity profiles (resolution sensitivity) being more affected than static profiles (detection sensitivity). At photopic background luminances, detection sensitivity was greatest at the fovea and progressively declined with increasing eccentricity; lower background luminances produced greater detection sensitivity for the near periphery than for the fovea. Resolution sensitivity for small targets (20/80 or less) exhibited a rapid decline with increasing eccentricity that was relatively independent of background luminance, whereas large targets (20/125 or greater) revealed findings similar to the detection sensitivity results. The relative contributions of rods and cones to threshold visual responses thus appear to depend on the type of visual task, target size, eccentricity, background luminance and thek interactions. These data provide a comparison basis for future evaluations of patients with photoreceptor dysfunction.",
keywords = "Acuity profile perimetry, Mesopic, Photopic, Scotopic adaptation, Static perimetry",
author = "Johnson, {C. A.} and Keltner, {John L} and Balestrery, {F. G.}",
year = "1981",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF00158022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "371--388",
journal = "Documenta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0012-4486",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels

AU - Johnson, C. A.

AU - Keltner, John L

AU - Balestrery, F. G.

PY - 1981/3

Y1 - 1981/3

N2 - Effects of target size, eccentricity and background luminance were determined for static and acuity profile perimetry in the central 30° radius of the visual field. Reductions in target size produced decreases in sensitivity for both functions, with acuity profiles (resolution sensitivity) being more affected than static profiles (detection sensitivity). At photopic background luminances, detection sensitivity was greatest at the fovea and progressively declined with increasing eccentricity; lower background luminances produced greater detection sensitivity for the near periphery than for the fovea. Resolution sensitivity for small targets (20/80 or less) exhibited a rapid decline with increasing eccentricity that was relatively independent of background luminance, whereas large targets (20/125 or greater) revealed findings similar to the detection sensitivity results. The relative contributions of rods and cones to threshold visual responses thus appear to depend on the type of visual task, target size, eccentricity, background luminance and thek interactions. These data provide a comparison basis for future evaluations of patients with photoreceptor dysfunction.

AB - Effects of target size, eccentricity and background luminance were determined for static and acuity profile perimetry in the central 30° radius of the visual field. Reductions in target size produced decreases in sensitivity for both functions, with acuity profiles (resolution sensitivity) being more affected than static profiles (detection sensitivity). At photopic background luminances, detection sensitivity was greatest at the fovea and progressively declined with increasing eccentricity; lower background luminances produced greater detection sensitivity for the near periphery than for the fovea. Resolution sensitivity for small targets (20/80 or less) exhibited a rapid decline with increasing eccentricity that was relatively independent of background luminance, whereas large targets (20/125 or greater) revealed findings similar to the detection sensitivity results. The relative contributions of rods and cones to threshold visual responses thus appear to depend on the type of visual task, target size, eccentricity, background luminance and thek interactions. These data provide a comparison basis for future evaluations of patients with photoreceptor dysfunction.

KW - Acuity profile perimetry

KW - Mesopic

KW - Photopic

KW - Scotopic adaptation

KW - Static perimetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019414952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019414952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF00158022

DO - 10.1007/BF00158022

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 371

EP - 388

JO - Documenta Ophthalmologica

JF - Documenta Ophthalmologica

SN - 0012-4486

IS - 2

ER -